"Before us, the Russian Land was not a thousand years, but many thousands of years,

and there will be more, for we have protected our Earth from enemies!"

Prince Kiy

While studying the history of my native country, I had the opportunity to get acquainted with a sufficient number of materials that different aspects illuminate the distant past of Russia. In the printed literature there are a large number of interpretations of the origin and evolution of the Russian people and the emergence of the first statehood on Russian soil. This is a natural process when researchers try to get to the bottom of the truth. This means that many of them are not satisfied with the current state of affairs in Russian history, which means that there are enough facts that do not fit into the version of the history of the Russian state proposed by academic science. But what does our science suggest? The clearest example of an academic point of view on Russian history is the book “History. Full course"(multimedia tutor for preparing for the exam, edition 2013).

In introducing this book, I will simply quote a few passages from it, which will allow you, the reader, to understand the essence of the academic concept. Russian history offered by our science. I would add that he not only proposes, but also defends his point of view with all the administrative resources available to science. So I'm quoting...

"The ancient history of the Slavs contains a lot MYSTERIES(highlighted by the author and further), but from the standpoint of modern historians, it boils down to the following. First, in the III - the middle of the II millennium BC. e. SOME Proto-Indo-European community from UNCLEAR areas around the Black Sea (perhaps from the peninsula of Asia Minor) moved to Europe. And further. “There are several versions of historians about the place where exactly the Slavic community was formed (theories of the emergence of the Slavs): the Carpatho-Danubian theory was first put forward (the homeland of the Slavs is the area between the Carpathians and the Danube), in the 20th century. the Vistula-Oder theory was born and became the main one (the Slavs arose north of the Carpathians), then academician B. Rybakov put forward a compromise theory, according to which the Slavs arose SOMEWHERE in Eastern Europe - from the Elbe to the Dnieper. Finally, there is a version that the Eastern Black Sea region was the ancestral home of the Slavs, and their ancestors were one of the branches of the Scythians - the Scythians-plowmen. And so on. To this it is also necessary to add the explanation of the name of the Slavs produced in the book - “it comes from the words“ word ”and“ know ”, that is, it means people whose language is understandable, in contrast to“ Germans ”(as if dumb) - so the Slavs called foreigners. Agree, all this is very interesting and even entertaining.

I don’t know about you, dear reader, but all these arguments like - MYSTERIES, SOME, UNCLEAR, SOMEWHERE, not only do not satisfy me, but also suggest that this is some kind of deliberate distortion of the existing facts. I proceed from the fact that academic science must have the strength and means to sort it out and bring clarity and certainty to our history. Judging by the above, there is no clarity, and no certainty. Why does science not, and I have, although not complete, but extensive information about ancient history Russian people. And I set out my concept of Russian history in the manuscript "On the Ancient History of Russia." Is there really not a single patriot among our Russian historians, not a single decent person who would criticize the lies that have been imposed on us all for about 300 years, and who would professionally unravel the “riddles” posed by science. Otherwise, it is not science. What I have presented to you above cannot be called science. Where in the word SLAVES is there or is the meaning "word" ??? Where can we conclude that the word SLAVES has the meaning "to know" ??? SLAVIES means "glorious". This is the direct and most correct message that comes to mind, and this meaning is already about 5 thousand years old (if not more). And that's why "glorious", this must be dealt with. But we have an answer to this question.

In the same place in the book "History. Full course" explained VERSIONS the origin of the word "Rus": "... either from the name of the Ros River - the right tributary of the Dnieper (this version is proposed academician B. Rybakov, but today it is considered obsolete), either from the name of the Varangians (according to the chronicle of Nestor), or from the word “roots”, which means “ship rowers”, which then became “ruotsi” (modern version)”. Dear gentlemen, scientists - be afraid of God! Talk about such things in the 21st century. And the worst thing is that our children are stuffed with all this, deliberately forming in them an inferiority complex and dependence on the West.

The book below notes. “The most important source on the events of Russian history from ancient times to the beginning of the 12th century. - the first Russian chronicle (the oldest surviving) - "The Tale of Bygone Years", the first edition of which was created by the monk of the Kiev-Pechora monastery Nestor around 1113. And on this “document” (why in quotation marks it will be clear a little later) academic science builds its concept of the history of Russia. Yes, there are many other interesting documents that cover our ancient history. But for some reason, it is the chronicle of Nestor that is the main one for academicians. Let's see what historians rely on in their delusion. The main message of official science is this. The Russian princely dynasty originated in Novgorod. In 859, the northern Slavic tribes drove the Varangians-Normans (“northern people”) overseas, immigrants from Scandinavia, who shortly before imposed tribute on them. However, internecine wars begin in Novgorod. To stop the bloodshed, in 862, at the invitation of the Novgorodians, the Varangian prince Rurik came to "reign". The Norman squad with its leader was a stabilizing factor in the struggle for power between the boyar clans. To this point of view, we put forward here our counterarguments that refute the dogmas of academic science:

The Russian princely dynasty was born long before the appearance of Rurik in Novgorod. Before that, Gostomysl ruled there, who was the 19th (!!!) prince from the famous prince Vandal (Vandalarius - born in 365)

Rurik was the grandson of Gostomysl (the son of the middle daughter of Gostomysl), which means that Rurik was Russian by blood.

There were no internecine wars in Novgorod. After the death of Gostomysl, his eldest grandson Vadim sat down to reign there. And Rurik was invited only to reign in Ladoga.

Rurik's squad was a destabilizing factor in Russia, with the help of which Rurik and his relatives seized power in Novgorod by force.

It would not occur to a single sane person to invite an unfamiliar person who has nothing to do with the current dynasty of princes, and even more so from some Normans who had just been expelled from the country across the sea and who were paid tribute.

All presented arguments will be revealed a little later. But even this is enough to demonstrate that the “most important source” of academic science does not correspond in its content to real events. It can also be briefly added to this for the time being that Dir and Askold had nothing to do with Rurik, they were not Varangians, let alone brothers, as our historical science.

What is the "Tale of Bygone Years"? This is most likely literary work not chronicle. The focus of the chronicler Nestor is the baptism of Russia by Prince Vladimir of the Rurik dynasty. All events before the baptism prepare the reader for this culmination, all subsequent events remind of its importance. Russia, as it were, emerges from the darkness of past non-existence shortly before its baptism. The author of The Tale is little interested in the pre-Christian past of the Slavs, although at that time, 1000 years before us, he probably had historical information, various myths and legends, and possibly manuscripts inherited from the pagan era. It is on such materials and information that have been preserved since those times that we will further build real story ancient Russia. It turns out that Nestor deliberately distorted the history of the Russian people, in other words, he was fulfilling someone's order.

Move on. Since the chronicle speaks of the events of the 12th century, the author lived no earlier. But at the same time, the question arises: how could the author, living in a Kiev monastery in the 12th century, know what was in Veliky Novgorod in the 9th century, given the enormous difficulties of the then roads and the “illiteracy” of the whole country? There is only one answer - no way! And therefore, the entire Nestor Chronicle is a simple writing from the words of other people or according to rumors and later times. And this is convincingly proven in the book by S. Valyansky and D. Kalyuzhny “ Forgotten History Russia". It says that "the oldest of all the lists of the Tale of Bygone Years" - Radzivilovskiy - was made only in early XVII century. Its pages contain traces of the rough work of a forger who tore out one sheet, inserted a sheet about the calling of the Varangians and prepared a place for inserting the lost “chronological sheet”. And this material, fabricated by someone, is taken as a source of knowledge??? And it will be even more surprising for the reader to find out at the same time that he found this list, i.e. presented to the whole world, our Tsar Peter Alekseevich, about whom there have long been rumors in well-known circles that the Tsar is “not real”. I mean the moment of the “substitution” of the real Tsar Peter, who went to study in Holland, accompanied by 20 (!!!) noble children, and returned from there with only one Menshikov, while all the rest either died or disappeared into prime of life in Holland. Interesting, isn't it.

In their study, S. Valyansky and D. Kalyuzhny highlighted another interesting fact in the chronicle, which concerns the puberty of our ancestors. It turns out that compared with other princely dynasties, such as Germany and England, "our princes in the period from the 10th to the 12th centuries reached puberty only in the thirtieth year of their life." This is so late in comparison with other dynasties that "it is impossible to believe such a chronology, which means that the chronicles depicting the activities of representatives of these dynasties cannot be considered reliable."

There are other important points related to the content of the chronicle. For example, in the annals of Nestor, information about comets, eclipses of the moon and the sun was not noted or shifted in time. Also, there is no information about Crusades and, especially about "the liberation of the Holy Sepulcher from the hands of the infidels." “What monk would not rejoice over this and would not devote not one, but many pages to this day as a joyful event for the entire Christian world?” But if the chronicler did not see the celestial eclipses that took place before his eyes, and did not know about the events that thundered throughout the world during his lifetime, then how could he know anything about the prince who was called 250 years before him? In any case, the so-called "initial chronicle" passes entirely to the position of the late apocrypha", i.e. works, the authorship of which is not confirmed and is unlikely. Here are the things.

Let us also refer to the opinion of our first historian V. Tatishchev. He noted that "all Russian historians revered Nestor, the chronicler, as the first and main writer." But V. Tatishchev did not understand why Nestor himself did not mention any ancient authors, including Bishop Joachim. V. Tatishchev was sure, and according to the legends, it was clear that the ancient stories were written, but did not reach us. The historian believed unequivocally that long before Nestor there were writers, for example, Joachim of Novgorod. But for some reason his story remained unknown to Nestor. And it is quite undoubted, according to V. Tatishchev, that Polish authors had (i.e., existed) Joachim's story, since Nestor did not mention many cases, but northern (Polish) authors did. V. Tatishchev also noted that “all the manuscripts that he had, although they had a beginning from Nestor, but in the continuation, none of them exactly converged with the other, in one thing, in another the other was added or reduced.”

E. Klassen analyzed in detail the question of what is the basis of the conviction about the beginning of the independence of the Russian people or about its statehood only from the time of Rurik's calling. On the annals of Nestor or on the conclusion about his legend L. Schlozer. From the chronicle, the author himself believed, it is clearly and undoubtedly clear that the tribes that called the Varangians led a political, state life, since they already constituted an alliance, a community of 4 tribes - Russia, Chud, Slavs, Krivichi, occupying up to 1 million square miles in northeastern corner of Europe and had cities - Novgorod, Staraya Ladoga, Staraya Rusa, Smolensk, Rostov, Polotsk, Belozersk, Izborsk, Lyubech, Pskov, Vyshgorod, Pereyaslavl. The Bavarian geographer counted 148 (!) Cities among the Eastern Slavs. Among the savages, E. Klassen believed, and we agree with him, living on such a stretch, one cannot even assume mutual relations, much less unity of thoughts, which was expressed by Russia, Chud, Slavs and Krivichi regarding the summoning of princes to the throne . And most importantly, savages do not have cities!

S. Lesnoy also mentioned Nestor in his research. He noted that “Nestor wrote not so much the history of Russia or southern Russia as the Rurik dynasty. As a comparison with the Joakimov and 3rd Novgorod chronicles shows, Nestor deliberately narrowed his history. The history of the northern, i.e. Novgorod Rus he was almost silent. He was a chronicler of the Rurik dynasty, and his tasks did not at all include a description of other dynasties, so he omitted the history of southern Russia, which had nothing to do with the Rurik dynasty. And most importantly, information about pre-Olegovian Russia could have been preserved by pagan priests or persons who were clearly hostile to Christianity. But it was monks like Nestor who destroyed the slightest traces reminiscent of paganism.” And also: “Nestor kept silent about this reign (of Gostomysl), only mentioning the fact itself. And you can understand why: he wrote the annals of the southern, Kievan, Rus, and the history of the north did not interest him. This led him away from the tasks assigned to him by the church. This is evident from the fact that he considered Oleg the first prince in Russia. He does not consider Rurik a Russian prince, because Novgorod was not called Russian at that time, but was called Slovenian. Perhaps Nestor would not have mentioned Rurik at all if it were not for his son Igor: it was impossible not to say who his father was.

This is the actual state of affairs with our ancient history. The fundamental principle of our state history according to academic science is "The Tale of Bygone Years", which, in fact, is a falsified document - a fake. This state of affairs with our history was further consolidated by foreigners called by sovereigns to write Russian history. Not only did they not know Russian, but they openly despised everything Russian, the country in which they lived. The brightest example academician L. Schlozer (1735 - 1809) can serve. Let's imagine one of Shlozer's "inferences" regarding the most ancient Russian history ( we are talking about the 7th century!): “A terrible emptiness reigns everywhere in the middle and northern Russia. Nowhere is the slightest trace of the cities that adorn Russia today. Nowhere is there any memorable name that would present to the spirit of the historian excellent pictures of the past. Where now beautiful fields delight the eye of a surprised traveler, there before this there were only dark forests and swampy swamps. Where now enlightened people have united in peaceful societies, there lived before this wild animals and half-wild people.

Let us briefly summarize what has been said. Nestor was the ideologist of the Rurik princes, the embodiment of their interests. It was considered unacceptable to admit that the Novgorod princes were older than the Rurikovichs, that the Russian princely dynasty existed long before Rurik. This undermined the Rurikovich's right to primordial power, and therefore it was mercilessly eradicated. That is why in The Tale of Bygone Years there is not a word about Slovenia and Rus, which laid the foundation for Russian statehood on the banks of the Volkhov. In the same way, Nestor also ignores the last prince of the pre-Rurik dynasty - Gostomysl, a person who is absolutely historical and mentioned in other primary sources, not to mention information from oral folk traditions. That is why The Tale of Bygone Years can in no way be considered a source about our antiquity, and our historical science is obliged to recognize this fact and create a real true history of our state in the shortest possible time. Our society needs this so much, it will greatly help in the moral education of our youth, not to mention the fundamental position - without knowing the past, you cannot build the future!

On the facts of ancient Russian history and statehood among the Rus, we previously prepared two manuscripts: “On the Ancient History of Russia” and “The History of the Russ according to the Book of Veles”. There is compelling evidence for high culture ancient Slavs and the presence of statehood among our ancestors long before the arrival of Rurik in Novgorod. In this study, it is supposed to continue work in this direction in order to present a variant of the history of the Russian people from ancient times according to the actual data. In this work, we will rely mainly on chronicle materials that were not widely circulated and are not perceived by academic science as historical sources. Among them: "The Legend of Slovenia and Rus",

"The genealogy of the Slavic-Russian people, its kings, elders and princes from the progenitor Noah to the Grand Duke Rurik and the princes of Rostov", "Tales of Zaharikha" and other.

About the sources used

When considering the issue of the ancient history of Russia, in our opinion, we must proceed from the following two very important points that directly affect the construction of the history of ancient Rus, and as a result, our correct perception of this history.

First, The Tale of Bygone Years is not an authentic document and cannot be considered as the main source on the history of ancient Russia. This is a document deliberately fabricated by the "authors", which, moreover, was subsequently clearly edited.

Second, The immediate history of the Rus begins 4,500 years ago, when a new haplotype arose as a result of a mutation on the Russian Plain, an identifier of the male gender, which at the moment has up to 70% of the entire male population of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. With this in mind, we will try further with a certain degree of probability, of course (the truth is not achievable), to show the reader the real history of our ancestors, which will be based on a sufficient number historical facts. We will take the necessary information from the historical sources we have identified. As such sources, we note once again: “The Legend of Slovena and Rus and the city of Slovensk”, the Joachim Chronicle, “Veles book”, “The genealogy of the Slavic-Russian people, its kings, elders and princes from the progenitor Noah to the Grand Duke Rurik and the princes of Rostov ”, “Tales of Zaharikha”, “Budinsky Izbornik”.

7 035

All processes going on in this world develop in time. Each current state has historical prerequisites that condition modernity by cause-and-effect relationships. It is the past that determines everything that is in the present, just as the present determines everything that will happen to us in the future. Therefore, all nations want to know their past.

“The Slavic peoples of Europe are miserable dying nations doomed to annihilation. In its essence, this process is deeply progressive. The primitive Slavs, who have given nothing to world culture, will be absorbed by the advanced civilized Germanic race. Any attempts to revive the Slavs, emanating from Asiatic Russia, are "unscientific" and "anti-historical." Ultimately, the Germans and the Germanized Jews should own not only the Slavic regions of Europe, but also Constantinople ”(F. Engels. “Revolution and Counter-Revolution”, 1852).

According to Moses' "Genesis", Noah, who survived the flood, had three sons, from whom the whole Earth was settled: Shem, Ham and Japheth. Shem got the south, Ham got the east, and Japheth got the north. Sons of Japheth: Homer, Javan, Madai, Magog, Mosoch, Tabal and Firas. Mosoch is the biblical ancestor of the wolverines. (According to Ezekiel, in the land of Magog also lived Gog, the prince of Rosa, Mosokh and Tavala).

The Jews are descended from Shem. The hundred-year-old Shem “gave birth” to Arfaksad two years after the flood and then lived for 500 years. Descendants of Arfaxad: Sala, Eber, Peleg, Raghav, Serug, Nachor, Terah, Abram. From Abram and his barren wife Sarah came the people of Israel. The compilers of the Old Testament with amazing accuracy calculated how many years passed from the Flood to the birth of Terah, the father of Abram - 222 years. At what age Terah “gave birth” to Abram, the Bible, unfortunately, does not indicate, and the duration of his life is extremely contradictory: “Tarah lived seven hundred years”, “And the days of Terah’s life were two hundred and five years, and Terah died in Haran”. The difference of five hundred years in Terah's life expectancy, with such scrupulous accuracy in calculating the years before his birth (202 years), personally surprises me greatly.

But if we ignore this contradiction, then the following degree of kinship between Russians and Jews will become obvious: Abram is the great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-nephew of Mosoch. That is, there is undoubtedly a relationship, but "the thirtieth water on jelly."

The first Russian philosopher, however, to declare the Russian people "exceptional" was P.Ya. Chaadaev: “We belong to the number of those nations that, as it were, are not part of humanity, but exist only in order to give the world some important lesson.” Russia, according to Chaadaev, is generally outside the axial time, outside the main path of mankind, outside the cultural space. Chaadaev saw this main path of humanity in Catholicism and urged Russia to part with Orthodoxy. And Russia "crazy" because, Chaadaev believed, that she did not have a heroic history, "the memory of which is the joy and teaching of adulthood." “First wild barbarism, then gross ignorance, then fierce and humiliating foreign domination, the spirit of which our national power later inherited - such is the sad story of our youth.” Russia is in unconsciousness, because in the past it has nothing but a gloomy, slavish, dead existence, the "basman madman" argued.

The tsarist autocracy declared him insane. Perhaps this announcement was wrong in essence. Firstly, because it was not Chaadaev who had to be declared insane, but those who taught him precisely such “Russian history”, that is, Russian historians of German nationality. And secondly, because his teachers were by no means madmen, but very smart people. It was just that such a Russian history was extremely beneficial to them, in which there was absolutely nothing good, but only savagery and hopelessness. And they laid such a Russian history, despite the resistance of M.V. Lomonosov and V.N. Tatishchev.

The most disgusting thing is that over the past two and a half centuries, Russian historians have done nothing to debunk the "Chaadaev" version. As if we had nothing heroic in the past. And it seems to me that they do not see any heroism, not because it was not there, but because they do not want to see it at close range.

I think not the last role in this was played by Marxism-Engelsism, which "ruled the show" in our country for more than seventy years. But Engels wrote: “The Slavic peoples of Europe are miserable, dying nations, doomed to annihilation. In its essence, this process is deeply progressive. The primitive Slavs, who have given nothing to world culture, will be absorbed by the advanced civilized Germanic race. Any attempts to revive the Slavs, emanating from Asiatic Russia, are "unscientific" and "anti-historical." Ultimately, the Germans and the Germanized Jews should own not only the Slavic regions of Europe, but also Constantinople ”(F. Engels. “Revolution and Counter-Revolution”, 1852).

Our historians fully and completely agreed with Yankel-Engels in terms of "scientific-unscientific", just as they previously agreed with the priests who claimed that before the adoption of Christianity, the ancestors lived in the forest, like any beast and kidnapped the girls near the water. But in fact, we had not even a thousand-year, but a multi-thousand-year history. A completely different story. Some far-sighted foreigners knew, felt this peculiarity, and connected it with our special position in our ancestral homeland-Hyperborea. Here is the opinion of the famous physician and naturalist Philip von Hohenhem, better known as Paracelsus: “There is one people that Herodotus calls the Hyperboreans. The current name of this people is Muscovy. You cannot trust their terrible decline, which will last for many centuries. The Hyperboreans know both a strong decline and a huge flourishing ... In this country of the Hyperboreans, which no one has ever thought of as a country in which something great can happen, the Great Cross will shine over the humiliated and outcast. Also, by the way, a German, but without the admixture of Jewish blood.

There was a lot of heroism in our past. Here is just one example:

Macedonian in connection with Russian history

Once, twice passing by Jerusalem and for some reason not noticing the proud Jews, Alexander the Great came to our land. It was on the river Yaksart (Yaik with Syrty). The Greeks called this river Tanais, "flowed" it from the Riphean (Urals), "flowed" into the Caspian Sea and drew the border between Europe and Asia along it. Medieval Germans called this Tanais Tanakvislem, and regarding Riphea, the Caspian Sea and the border of Europe with Asia, they spoke in exactly the same way as the Greeks.

Ambassadors from the local people, the Greeks called him Scythians, urging Alexander to be at peace with them, told Alexander that they remember how their ancestors defeated Media and Syria and reached Egypt, that in the west their country borders on Thrace. Alexander, apparently, did not read Herodotus, who wrote more than a century before Alexander: “Among all the peoples known to us, only the Scythians possess one, but the most important art. It consists in the fact that they do not allow a single enemy who attacked their country to be saved.

Alexander, who lived on Jaxarte, could not conquer the people, despite the fact that he destroyed seven local cities. He only invaded the right bank of the Jaxarth in Europe for 20 km and returned. Medieval Iranians believed that Alexander fought the Russians here. The Central Asians called the population of Yaxarth Ustrushans, that is, Russian people living at the mouth of the Tana River, and the Germans called the inhabitants of the lower reaches of the Tanakvisl Slavs-vans. Since one of the seven cities mentioned was built Persian king Cyrus, Caucasians and learned Jews called Yaksart the Kira River and the Russian River.

I am fully aware of the fact that all of the above related to Jaxart and A.Macedonsky, to put it mildly, is indisputable. Historians consider Yaksart to be the Syr Darya, the Ustrushans are placed in Central Asia, and the Scythians are considered Iranians. But that is precisely the function of science, to sort out controversial issues. In short, if I were the President of Russia or the Chairman of the Government, I would create five research institutes to consider the problem with different parties: from Greek, Iranian, Central Asian, German and Russian. Perhaps we could prove to the “Chadaevites” that we did have a heroic history, and what a story!

Localization of the Ancestral Home of Humanity

It should be noted with all resoluteness that in historical science, as in philosophy, there is the main question, formulated as follows: modern peoples were born on the lands where they now live (autochthonous), or their ancestral home, the place of development was in completely different lands (allochthonism). )? Traditionally, Western historians resolve this issue in favor of autochthonism, despite the fact that there were epochs of the Great Migration of Peoples, despite the fact that the Indo-Aryans and Iranians came to the places of their current residence from somewhere in the Arctic: we. Europeans, of course, are autochthons, and all sorts of barbarian aliens there are allochthons. Thus, the concept of resettlement rests on the question: did all peoples migrate and how was this resettlement - chaotic or directed.

The harmony and meaningfulness of the concept of resettlement is given by the idea of ​​a single ancestral home of mankind. Some linguists insist on this idea, seeing a deep kinship of languages ​​not only of Indo-European language family, but also of the Ural, Altai, Kartvelian, Semitic-Hamitic and Dravidian families.

Ethnographers and culturologists give a lot of evidence of the existence of a single ancestral home. The ancient Indo-Aryans called it Meru, the Greeks Hyperborea, the Slavs Lukomorye and Land-Earth. At the same time, G.M. Bongard-Levin and E.A. Grantovsky discovered the extreme similarity of the Greek myths about Hyperborea with the Vedic narratives about the Arctic ancestral home. The well-known Sanskritologist Bal Gangadhar Tilak analyzed the Indo-Aryan Vedas in detail and came to the conclusion that the Arctic was the homeland of the Aryans. He called his book, which went through several editions at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, “The Arctic Homeland in the Vedas”. In the very early XXI century, it was translated into Russian and published in Russia.

Based on this hypothesis, the anthropological type of speakers of the Early Indo-European language should have been boreal, that is, most of all correspond to Scandinavian: blond hair, blue eyes, white skin, etc. It was this point of view that the German scientists shared and it was not their fault that the Nazis used this doctrine.

In addition to linguistic and racial features, the Aryans, as people from the Arctic ancestral home, were also characterized by other features, such as a cultural function, economic structure, the role of women in managing society, religion and position in the First civil war. If you snatch out one of the signs from the sum, it is not difficult to fall into a mistake.

Many opinions have also been expressed on the issue of localization: these are the Northern Black Sea region, Asia Minor and the Eurasian Arctic. This last localization surprisingly coincides with the ancient Greek Hyperborean myths and the Vedic hymns of the Rigveda, which was noticed by Grantovsky and Bongard-Levin.

According to my concept, the Indo-European ancestral home formed quite naturally on the Taimyr Peninsula. This process was determined by climatic conditions and developed as follows. Under the conditions of the Ice Age, which reigned on Earth for the last three million years, animals were successively squeezed out of Europe into Siberia. This happened due to the large snow cover in Europe and the lack of snow in Siberia. Warm currents, in particular the Gulf Stream, caused gigantic evaporation near European coasts, snowfalls covered Europe, while Atlantic cyclones arrived in Siberia already dry. A “hunting paradise” was created in Siberia (A.N. Okladnikov): a colossal number of mammoths, woolly rhinos, reindeer and wild horses easily fed on a plain with little snow, and it was easy for a person to get them. Therefore, Neanderthals first migrated from Europe to Siberia, and later (40-10 thousand years ago) Cro-Magnons. Europe has become depopulated, and the Siberian expanses have accommodated everyone.

At the end of the Ice Age in Europe, the three-kilometer-thick Scandinavian glacier melted for a long time, and in Siberia, where there was no powerful ice cover due to the absence of heavy snowfalls, the ice melted much faster and the climatic zones began to quickly shift to the north. Cold-loving mammoths also moved north, and people followed them. (Now Siberia has already become depopulated and Academician Okladnikov called this phenomenon the Mesolithic crisis of culture). Both of them began to accumulate on the shores of the Arctic seas. And since the coast of the Arctic Ocean is built in the form of a wedge (the White Sea and Cape Dezhnev are located at the latitude of the Arctic Circle, and Cape Chelyuskin on the Taimyr Peninsula is 12 degrees to the north), animals and people are concentrated in the north of Taimyr behind the Byrranga mountains.

Opponents believe that Siberia was settled by people much later. Because it's cold, because it's far away... But in fact, already 10 thousand years ago, the territory of Taimyr was densely populated. In 1993, in the course of archaeological field research under the program of the Russian-German project, on the northern shore of Lake Taimyr, an ancient man's tavern was discovered, where he was thrown into the trash great amount fragmented bones of a wide variety of animals, including the mammoth. The absolute age of the bones from this feast is 1020+-60 and 9680+-130 years.

Two words about the importance of the initial concentration of the Siberian population in the north of the Taimyr Peninsula. If earlier people lived in the vast Siberian expanses scattered, according to the laws of the pride in the form of primitive human herds, guarded their territory, and simply ate strangers, then having concentrated they were forced to establish good-neighborly human relations with each other. Simply put, a person became a person, and sociogenesis became the result of the initial concentration. . In addition, a huge number of concentrated animals led the then people, firstly, to a settled way of life, and, secondly, to productive forms of management - animal husbandry and agriculture. Than running after animals on the pampas, isn't it easier to throw a rope around the neck of the nearest deer or horse and spit it tomorrow? Hands and brains were freed for handicrafts, art and science, for serving the gods, administration, etc. Thus, the conditions for the formation of civilization were formed. And she formed. It was a civilization explosion. Statehood, urban planning, metallurgy - everything arose quickly and rapidly, and the rest of humanity, including in Egypt, Sumer, the Indus and the Huang, continued to stay in the Stone Age. It was the newcomers from the Taimyr ancestral home that created secondary centers of civilization in these places, which can be confirmed by the composition of the bronzes.

What made the ancestors leave the ancestral home? At first, it was simply overpopulation. After all, the territory of the Ancestral Motherland (the northern slopes of Byrrang, the Kara coast, the islands Severnaya Zemlya) is very small and fills up quickly. Soon people settled throughout Taimyr. The first long-distance migrations to the south were peaceful and the settlers did not build fortifications in their new places of residence. At the same time, they did not pray to the gods, but to the goddesses and worshipers they had women.

Later main reason the outcome was a sharp cold snap. Here is how it is said about him in the Avesta: “The homeland of the Aryans was once a bright, beautiful country, but an evil demon sent cold and snow on it, which began to hit it every year for ten months. The sun began to rise only once, and the year itself turned into one night and one day. On the advice of the gods, people left there forever. Further, in the Avesta, the details of the exodus of the Avestan, led by Yima, are very revealingly described: “And three hundred winters came to the kingdom of Yima and it became crowded with people and cattle. Then Yima stepped out into the light at noon on the path of the Sun and expanded his country, where people lived for six hundred years, and then again expanded the country towards the Sun and lived in the country for nine hundred years.

It should be noted that resettlements never happen “to the last person”. A smaller part of the people left, as a rule, they were active young people capable of reproducing and conquering new lands. Most of the people (parents!) remained. It is no coincidence that the Iranians who migrated called the Turans who remained in their ancestral homeland their elder brothers. It is no coincidence that the Germans call the new fatherland "Deutschland" - a daughter land.

So, settlers came out of the Ancestral Homeland, creating centers of civilization in Egypt, Sumer, in Harappa, on Huankh. Later, the Hittites, Iranians, Cimmerians, Scythians, Germanic Celts came out from here. These are the so-called branches of the ethnogenetic and linguistic tree of the Ancestral Homeland. And what was the trunk of this formation, this community? What modern nation is the bearer of the language, religion, traditions, rituals, meaning-giving values ​​of the Ancestral Motherland? We do not have enough data to judge this issue with confidence. But we can reason. Look, the Indo-Aryans, the Indians left, the Wends remained, the Iranians left - the Turans remained. True, both of them soon moved to Europe and to the south. Western Siberia. Wends (Wends) in Europe are quite rightly considered the ancestors of the Slavs. The Persians consider Turanians to be their elder brothers and confidently produce Russians from them. Thus, we have the right to believe that the Slavs, and more specifically, the Russians, are the successor of the stem ethnolinguistic formation of the Indo-European Homeland, since 80% of the Slavs are Russian people. And this means that we have the right and even the obligation to look for ancient traces of the Slavs in Taimyr.

Localization of the Slavic Homeland

A century and a half ago, in the Balkans, in the Macedonian province of Bulgaria, the remarkable ethnographer Stefan Ilyich Verkovich recorded a huge number of ancient Macedonian songs. Verković was a Bosnian Serb, Pan-Slavist, and knew the Pomak (Macedonian) language well. In 1860, he published in Belgrade the collection "Narodne Pesme Macedonian Bulgara". In total, he collected 1515 songs, legends and legends with a total volume of 300,000 lines. From 1862 to 1881 an insignificant part of this collection (about one tenth) was published by him.

French linguists, who studied the Indio-Aryan Vedas in detail at the end of the 19th century, showed interest in the materials collected by Verkovich. In 1871, the French Ministry of Public Education instructed Auguste Dozon, consul in Philippopolis, who spoke South Slavic dialects, to verify the authenticity and archaism of Macedonian songs. Dozon was forced to recognize the Macedonian songs as unconditionally authentic. Moreover, he himself recorded and published in France a curious Macedonian song about Alexander and his horse Bucephalus.

Interested in Verkovich's work Russian emperor Alexander II. The second volume of the "Veda of the Slavs" was published with the financial and organizational support of Alexander. The assassination of the reformer tsar by terrorists marked the beginning of the suppression of the results of Verkovich's work and for a long time, if not forever, pushed back the recognition of the Slavic Homeland in the Arctic.

The main statement of the "Veda of the Slavs" is the assertion that the Slavic ancestral home was not located at all where the Slavs lived at the end of the 19th century. The Vedas convincingly speak of the exodus of the ancestors of the Slavs from the Far North from the Northern ancestral home, which the Macedonians called the Land of Land. The edge of the earth was really on the edge of the Eurasian continent near the Black, that is, covered with darkness, sea, into which two White (covered with ice and snow) Danubes flowed. In the Land of the Land, winter and summer lasted for half a year, which testifies not only to the polar conditions of this land, but also to its proximity to the North Pole.

So, the Slavic ancestral home of the Land of the Earth was located in the Eurasian Arctic. But it is large, from the Kola Peninsula to Cape Dezhnev. Try it, look it up!

However, in the "Slavic Vedas" there are other signs that make it possible to narrowly localize the search area. In the "Vedas" the people of the Yuriy people are mentioned. Arab travelers Ibn Fadlan and Al-Garnati, who visited the Volga Bulgaria, called Yugra Yura. If so, the Land-Earth was located next to Yugra, and this is the Subpolar Urals and the Trans-Urals.

In addition, there were Holy Mountains in Land's End. In our Arctic there are mountains on Kola Peninsula, there is the Subpolar Urals, there are the Byrranga mountains, there is the Putorana plateau, there are the Verkhoyansky and Chersky ridges. Of the listed mountain objects, the Putorana Mountains attract our attention first of all. Why? Because in the "Slavic Vedas" there are mentions of toponyms and "heroes" that are very similar phonetically with Putorana toponyms.

Firstly, the Vedas mention a certain dragon that lives in a mountain lake and does not allow people to pass through the mountain gorge and the lake. The dragon was called Harsh Lamia. Not far from Norilsk, in the mountain gorge of the Putorana Plateau, there is a lake called Lama. It may very well be that Lake Lama near Norilsk is named after Severe Lamia.

Secondly, in the Land-Earth, according to the Vedas, Cheta-Krai is mentioned (Cheta-Earth, also known as the Chitai Land). The Russian translator of the "Slavic Vedas" Alexander Igorevich Asov considers it possible to call this Chitai land Chinese land. In this case, we are not talking about China at all. On the medieval map of Witsen (XVII century), the river China was called the Yenisei, and the Chinese land was considered the interfluve of the Ob and the Yenisei. To the south of Lake Lama in the Putorana Mountains is Lake Heta. On the modern maps the signature near this lake is duplicated in brackets by the name Kita. The entire north of Siberia between the Ob and the Yenisei and to the east is characterized by an abundance of Hittite hydronyms. The transition of "x" to "k" (Khatanga - Katanga, Khetta - Keta) as a result of Turkization is very typical for Siberia and not only for Siberia.

Thirdly, the Kharapskoe field is part of the Land of Land. In the Kharapsky land, near the two White Danubes, there was the country of Pravda (Shernie-land). In the south of the Putorana Plateau there is the Gorbiachin River. Taking into account the regular letter transition ("g" - "x", "p" - "b"), in the presence of the formant "chin", Gorbiachin clarifies the localization of the Kharapsky field and the country of Pravda.

Fourthly, in the "Vedas" it is said that Divy people lived near the Kharapsky field. They did not plow the land, did not sow, did not engage in any productive labor, lived by robbery and were essentially savages, cave troglodytes. Divas, Divy people are known from Russian chronicles and Slavic folklore. These hairy giants were used in battles as indestructible heroes. Nizami wrote about this in the poem "Iskender-name". In Bulgar Arab travelers saw them on chains. The Tatars gave Edigei two wild hairy people caught in Siberia on Mount Arbus.

In the west of the Putorana Plateau between the Gorbiachin River and Lake Kheta (Kita), we found more than a dozen Gog-Magog hydronyms: the Tonelgagochar River (the Goga Tunnel River), the Irbegagochar River (the Goga Fish River), the Gogochonda River, the bay of the Khantai reservoir Mogokta (many Magogs) and two rivers with the same name, the Malaya Mogokta River, the Mokogon and Umokogon Rivers, the Makus River, the Mogen and Mogady Bays. Such an abundance of Gog-Magog hydronyms on an area of ​​30 by 30 km indicates that the Divy people lived here and it was here that A. Macedonsky built the Copper Gate against the Gogs and Magogs.

Toponymy

During migrations, historians say, every last person never leaves. Usually parties of young energetic people are sent to new lands, capable of active reproduction, but still a smaller part of the people. Most remain. There remains a stem ethnic formation. Above, we have already found out that the successors of the "trunk" are the Russians. And consequently, the toponymy of the Ancestral Motherland should abound in Russian names, or processed Russian toponyms. But this is precisely the picture we are seeing in Taimyr.

It is known that when they came to Siberia, the Cossacks were faced with the fact that the names of rivers, mountains, swamps, etc. sounded in the mouths of local residents somehow very much in Russian. In the Western Altai and in the north of Siberia, in places there were only Russian toponyms in general. So, on the rivers Khet, Kotue and Khatanga, in the drawing of Semyon Remezov “Pomorie Turukhanskoye” (end of the 17th century), only Russian names are shown: Boyarsko, Romanovo, Medtsovo, Medvedevo, Sladkovo, Daursko, Esseiko, Zhdanovo, Krestovo, etc. Of course, one can think that these names were given by Russian Cossack pioneers in the 17th century. But what a catch! Some unconditionally Russian names are present on Western European maps of the 16th century (maps of Mercator, Gondius, Herberstein, Sanson, etc.): Lukomorye, Grustina, Serponov, Terom, etc. These maps were bought in Moscow from officials greedy for bribes, and they were compiled by Russian people, either pioneers or natives. It is important that these names are pre-Yermakov, that Russians lived in Siberia until the beginning of the 17th century. And, consequently, part of the impeccably Russian toponyms in Siberia are pre-Ermak.

There are a lot of Russian toponyms in Taimyr. River Kazak-Yakha, r. Talovaya, r. Rybnaya, oz. Deep, Medvezhka, Chest, r. Wolverine. But it is very difficult to isolate which objects were named in the 17th century and later, and which have been preserved since ancient times. It is logical to assume that the more ancient toponyms were largely reworked by the Nenets, Evenks, Nganasans, Dolgans, Yukaghirs and other local peoples. There are such toponyms here. For example, the right tributary of the Taz River is called the Lutseyakha (in brackets - the Russian River). It’s good that the translation is given on the map, otherwise you can’t recognize the Russian river in this Lutseyakh. Two more impeccably Russian hydronyms - Nyucha-Khetta in the Nadym basin - Russian Khetta and Nyuchchadkholyak - the right tributary of the Popigay River. Nyucha, so the Yakuts still call Russians. In the passport of my wife, who received it in Yakutia, the nationality column says “nuucha”

This is also Cape Armed in the north of Lake Pyasino, the Dzhangy (Money) River in the Kharayelakh Mountains, Lake. Gudke, Mount Gudchikha. The undoubted reworking of these toponyms indicates that they are very ancient. These names were given to geographical objects immediately after the departure of the Indo-Aryans and Iranians, and maybe even when they were in these places. But this is at least the second millennium BC.

And now let's ask ourselves a question: how could our ancestors, living in Taimyr, fail to notice the richest local ore? Of course they couldn't. They found it and actively developed it. Based on archeological data and the chemical composition of the bronzes, Yuri Krakovetsky, the chief geologist of the Norilskgeology Production Association, and Viktor Vakhrushev, a leading specialist, argue that copper was mined in the Norilsk region as early as the 9th century BC. Joining the Norilsk geologists will not be a big deal, and we will join them. We only add that the Taimyr bronzes were melted with an additive not of tin, but of arsenic, which was mined in the area of ​​the Tarei River. One must think that it was the Taimyr arsenic bronze with a high content of silver and gold, as well as Norilsk copper with an admixture of nickel, platinum and palladium, that were traded in the Mediterranean by the unsurpassed navigators Phoenicians. The Phoenicians and Greeks called this land Tartessus, and greatest poet in antiquity, Homer directly connected Tartess with Tartarus and Tartaria.

Trading in copper and bronze, the then Taimyr (Tartess) grew fabulously rich, and the hydronym Dzhanga may be alluding to this particular side of the local land. The local riches could not but attract conquerors. So people came here with a sword: Semiramis, Cyrus, Alexander the Great. True, everyone was beaten, Semiramis took away only 20 people, Cyrus saved seven, and the invincible Macedonian froze three-quarters of his troops in the snows of Putorana.

The Russian idea in the light of the "trunk" and "branches"

Let's return to the Russian idea. Since we are the stem ethnic formation of the Siberian Ancestral Homeland, our Russian identity is expressed through the difference between the trunk and branches. Just as it is impossible to make a log, beam, chopping block, plank, carve an oblank, etc. out of branches, even thick ones, in ethnogenetic branches one cannot see carriers of the parent language, ancient traditions, original meaning-giving values, continuously developing culture. All this is the prerogative of stem education.

We, Russians, differ from the non-Slavic peoples of Eurasia precisely in that we are the bearers of the most ancient spirituality based on the service of Truth (company), the bearers of the most ancient Vedic worldview, we own the most ancient and beautiful language we are developing the oldest and most humane culture on earth.

Our relationship with the peoples who separated and moved to new lands was akin to the relationship between children and parents. Parents tend to love all children equally. Concern for the departing "children" led to the "universality" of the Russian people noted by Dostoevsky, to the purity of nationalism. The attitude of the departed peoples towards us was often likened to the attitude of children towards their "backward ancestors", and some of the "children", I mean primarily the Germans, were stuck in a transitional age.

It was our stem position and parental attitude towards other peoples that caused the “inexplicable” growth Russian Empire, voluntary accession to us of small and large ethnic groups. Remember how instantly and almost bloodlessly Siberia was taken. Compare this with how the “enlightened and civilized” Anglo-Saxons “mastered” North America, how many millions of Indians they destroyed in the process.

Our stem position also explains to us the ease with which the Russian language was perceived by the annexed peoples. The Russian language is able to convey any shades of thought because these thoughts exist. In other words, language is the expression of the deepest worldview, worldview, worldview. In this regard, all attempts by some brazen politicians to discard the Russian language are doomed to failure - the development of science and art will slow down.

From the stem position, we can explain all the features of the Russian national character: the mystery of the Russian soul, which is so surprising to Westerners, lies in its high spirituality. The soulless West cannot understand and accept our Ivan the Fool, who is a fool only because he is not acquisitive. Negligence is one of the most characteristic features Russian character. Being rich in the midst of the surrounding poverty was considered shameful in Russia.

Next to non-acquisitiveness stands contemplation. It has always been important for a Russian person to understand something most important about life, and for this it was necessary to carefully contemplate life and think about it, and not just work hard. By the way, Russian people know how to work hard no worse than ants. Harsh climatic conditions have accustomed us to this. When winter rolls in your eyes, you have to work at the limit of your strength.

Two words about Russian fearlessness, which made the Russian soldier the best in the world. This fearlessness was a consequence of the ancient Vedic worldview. According to the ideas of the ancestors, the human soul after the death of the body did not go to heaven or hell, but was embodied in a new body to live a new life on Earth. The Magi taught young warriors not to be afraid of death in battle, because they promised the young men an early new incarnation in their family, among their people. To do this, the Magi attracted young women and used ritual sex immediately after the battle, while the souls dead soldiers didn't get far. Christian preachers have broken many poisonous arrows over this ritual they misunderstood.

And what is the role of Christianity in the formation of the Russian national character? I think his role was, to put it mildly, exaggerated by his predecessors. But to the inconsistency of the Russian character, which N.A. tirelessly emphasized. Berdyaev and led out of dual faith, Christianity is undoubtedly involved. On the one hand, humility and humility, on the other, a tendency to revelry and anarchy. On the one hand, a steadfast adherence to Orthodoxy, on the other, an abundance of mystical sects. It is easy to see that some traits of the Russian character, such as fearlessness, unbridledness, love of freedom, and, first of all, the desire for inner freedom of the spirit, communitarianism, a penchant for witchcraft bear traces of the influence of paganism, or rather the ancient Vedic religion, while humility, patience, almost slavish obedience, due to the influence of Christianity.

Curiously, thanks to the research of Ksenia Kasyanova, we can quantify how much more pagan in our character than in the character of Americans or Western Europeans. It turns out that most of all we differ from Americans in unbridled feelings, men at 13% of the scale, and women as much as 20%.

But still, our main difference with the West, the "trunk from the branches" lies in the meaning-giving values. In the West there has been a monstrous shift of these values ​​from the realm of the spiritual to the realm of the material. All their values ​​are reduced to the "golden calf", everything is valued at face value. Here is an example. In December 1993, journalist Yuri Geiko described in Komsomolskaya Pravda a typical American "love story" about how an Italian persuaded his seventeen-year-old mistress Emmy Fisher to shoot his annoyed wife. Fischer missed and only injured her opponent. She survived, but Emmy was imprisoned. And then the absolutely unimaginable begins. Newspapers and television literally go crazy for this Fisher: every day for months, articles, interviews, photos. Three major TV companies release three films on the screens, and ... the Americans are watching! The results of a survey of three hundred students at Columbia University showed that in the top ten most popular people in America, Emmy Fisher shared third and fourth place with George W. Bush himself. The spouses who became millionaires reconciled and live, they say, soul to soul. Fisher, who has become a millionaire, is quietly waiting for her release.

How do we differ from the West in terms of meaningful values? The fact that we are still aware that their “tower has been demolished”, but they don’t understand this anymore, they don’t understand at all what is good and what is bad. Vaguely foreseeing the impending catastrophe, the World is looking at our country with hope. Will we justify these hopes? Will the “loose kids” listen to us? However, before we take up the belt, we need to prove to the whole world our “trunk position”. And for this, our historical science needs to take some absolutely extraordinary measures. Especially for fools, I’ll say that they have something to cling to: first of all, you need to shoot all doctors and candidates for a doctor of historical sciences and create a new historical science out of the blue, and then retrain school teachers.

to favorites to favorites from favorites 0

The war against Russia has been going on for a very long time and very, very successfully. Of course, not on the battlefields, where we have always beaten everyone and very painfully, but where the West has always won and continues to win - in information wars. The main goal is to prove to the inhabitants of our country that they are stupid, brainless cattle, not even second-rate, but somewhere around 6-7 ranks, without past and future. And he has already practically proved that even the authors of many patriotic articles agree with this approach entirely.

Examples? You are welcome!

The first capital, the city of Slovensk, was founded in 2409 BC... Example 1. We recently celebrated the 1000th anniversary of Russia. When did she actually show up? First capital (capital only major country!), the city of Slovensk, was founded in 2409 BC (3099 from the creation of the world); the source of information is the chronicle of the Kholopye Monastery on the Mologa River, the chronograph of Academician M. N. Tikhomirov, S. Herberstein’s “Notes on Muscovy”, “The Tale of Slovenia and Rus”, which is ubiquitous and recorded by many ethnographers.

Since it is believed that Novgorod was built on the site of Slovensk, I pestered the archaeologists leading the excavation, as far as it is plausible. They literally answered me like this:

“And hell knows. We have already dug up the Paleolithic sites there.”

Rurik is the grandson of the Novgorod prince Gostomysl, the son of his daughter Umila and one of the neighboring princes of a lower rank ... Example 2. It is generally accepted that somewhere in the 8th century, wild brainless and good-for-nothing Slavs, wandering in herds through the forests, called to themselves Viking Rurik and said: "Own control of us, O great European superman, otherwise we, idiots, cannot do anything ourselves." (A free presentation of a history textbook). Actually,

Rurik is the grandson of the Novgorod prince Gostomysl, the son of his daughter Umila and one of the neighboring princes of a lower rank. He was called along with his brothers, since all 4 sons of Gostomysl died or perished in wars. He was accepted by agreement with the elders, and worked hard to earn respect in Russia. Source: Joachim Chronicle, Russian history according to Tatishchev, Brockhaus and Efron, etc.

Example 3. The opinion is spread everywhere that almost the only civilization of the past was the Roman Empire, a model of legality and morality. In general, that the gladiator fights of Rome, that the modern indulgence of marauders in Iraq is one field of berries. The morality of the Western world has not changed much, and still causes disgust among "savages" like Russians, Chinese and Dagestanis.

Bare-assed and bare-footed, poorly armed Roman infantry... The official story: the great, beautiful and mighty Roman civilization fell under the blows of smelly shaggy savages. In fact, the geeks, fed up with everything (as the Americans are now), were subjected to sanitation by more decent neighbors. Naked and bare-footed, poorly armed Roman infantry (open a textbook on the history of the ancient world, and admire the legionnaires) was trampled by cataphracts clad in steel from the tops to the horse's hooves.

The main source of information is "Cataphracts and their role in the history of military art" by A.M. Khazanov. (I don’t remember the rest, but those who wish can rummage through the auto search themselves. There is a lot of material - they just don’t let him into schools. “Harmful”).

Cataphracts are the Slavs who defended themselves against the Europeans ... The most interesting thing is where did the Huns come from to “clean up” Rome? Ob, Ugra, the Volga region, the Urals, the Sea of ​​\u200b\u200bAzov ... Graves with partial armament of cataphracts were also found in Dagestan. Have you, comrade patriots, looked at the map for a long time? So where did the Huns go to Rome? Why was "wild Russia" in Europe called Gardarik - the Land of Cities? Now it doesn't matter, because we are celebrating 1000 years of Russia with joyful faces, we consider Rurik the owner who came from Norway, founded Russia, and even, it seems, we are proud of such a story.

4 millennia were sent down the drain, impudently fucked up, as uninteresting - and not a single dog even yelped.

1:0 in favor of the West.

The second goal against the Russian fools. In the 8th century, one of the Russian princes nailed a shield to the gates of Constantinople, and it is difficult to argue that Russia did not exist even then. Therefore, in the coming centuries, long-term slavery was planned for Russia. The invasion of the Mongol-Tatars and the 3rd century of humility and humility. What marked this era in reality? We will not deny our laziness Mongolian yoke, but ... As soon as the existence of the Golden Horde became known in Russia, young guys immediately went there to ... rob the Mongols who had come from rich China to Russia. The Russian raids of the 14th century are best described (if anyone has forgotten, the period from the 14th to the 15th century is considered the yoke).

In 1360, the Novgorod lads fought along the Volga to the Kama mouth, and then stormed the large Tatar city of Zhukotin (Dzhuketau near modern city Chistopol). Having seized untold riches, the ushkuyniki returned back and began to “drink zipuns on drink” in the city of Kostroma. From 1360 to 1375, the Russians made eight large campaigns on the middle Volga, not counting small raids. In 1374, the Novgorodians took the city of Bolgar (not far from Kazan) for the third time, then went down and took Saray itself, the capital of the Great Khan.

In 1375, the Smolensk guys in seventy boats under the command of the governor Prokop and Smolyanin moved down the Volga. Already by tradition, they paid a "visit" to the cities of Bolgar and Sarai. Moreover, the rulers of Bolgar, taught by bitter experience, paid off with a large tribute, but the Khan's capital Saray was taken by storm and plundered. In 1392, the Ushkuiniki again took Zhukotin and Kazan. In 1409, the governor Anfal led 250 ears to the Volga and Kama. And in general, to beat the Tatars in Russia was considered not a feat, but a trade.

A monograph by the Tatar historian Alfred Khasanovich Khalikov... During the Tatar "yoke" the Russians went to the Tatars every 2-3 years, Saray was fired dozens of times, Tatars were sold to Europe by the hundreds. What did the Tatars do in response? Wrote complaints! To Moscow, to Novgorod. The complaints persisted. There was nothing more the “enslavers” could do. The source of information on the mentioned campaigns - you will laugh, but this is a monograph by the Tatar historian Alfred Khasanovich Khalikov.

They still cannot forgive us these visits! And at school they still tell how Russian gray-pawed men cried and gave their girls into slavery - because they are submissive cattle. And you, their descendants, also penetrate this thought. Does anyone doubt the reality of the yoke?

2:0 in favor of the West.

Ivan the Terrible In the 16th century, Ivan the Terrible came to power. During his reign in Russia:

Jury trial introduced;

Free primary education (church schools);

Medical quarantine at the borders;

Local elected self-government, instead of governors;

For the first time there was a regular army (and the first in the world military uniform- at archers);

Stopped Tatar raids;

Equality was established between all segments of the population (do you know that serfdom did not exist at that time in Russia at all? The peasant was obliged to sit on the land until he paid for its rent, and nothing more. And his children were considered free from birth, in any case !).

Slave labor is prohibited (source - Ivan the Terrible's lawsuit);

The state monopoly on the fur trade introduced by Grozny was abolished only 10 (ten!) years ago.

The territory of the country is increased by 30 times!

The emigration of the population from Europe exceeded 30,000 families (those who settled along the Zasechnaya line were paid a raise of 5 rubles per family. Account books have been preserved).

The growth in the welfare of the population (and taxes paid) during the reign amounted to several thousand (!) Percent.

During the entire reign, there was not a single executed without trial and investigation, total number"repressed" ranged from three to four thousand. (And the times were dashing - remember St. Bartholomew's night).

Now remember what you were told about Grozny at school? That he is a bloody tyrant and lost the Livonian War, and Russia was shaking in horror?

3:0 in favor of the West.

By the way, about the stupid Americans as a result of propaganda. Already in the 16th century in Europe there were many brochures for every brainless layman. It was written there that the Russian tsar was a drunkard and a debauchee, and all his subjects were the same wild freaks. And in the instructions to the ambassadors, it was indicated that the tsar was a teetotaller, unpleasantly smart, categorically cannot stand drunk people, and even forbade drinking alcohol in Moscow, as a result of which you can “get drunk” only outside the city, in the so-called “liquor” (the place where they pour it) . Source - study "Ivan the Terrible" by Kazimir Valishevsky, France. Now guess three times - which of the two versions is presented in the textbooks?

In general, our textbooks proceed from the principle that everything that is said about vile Russia is true. Everything that is said good or intelligible is a lie.

One example. In 1569 Grozny arrived in Novgorod, which had approximately 40,000 inhabitants. An epidemic was raging there, and it also smelled of a riot. According to the results of the visit of the sovereign, the commemorative lists completely preserved in the synodics mark 2800 dead. But Jerome Horsey in "Notes on Russia" indicates that the guardsmen slaughtered 700,000 (seven hundred thousand (?)) people in Novgorod.

Guess which of the two numbers is considered historically accurate?

4:0 in favor of the West.

Wild Russians weep and wail. And they are constantly stolen and driven into slavery by dashing Crimean infidels. And the Russians are crying and paying tribute. Almost all historians point a finger at the stupidity, weakness and cowardice of the Russian rulers, who could not cope even with the shabby Crimea. And for some reason they “forget” that there was no Crimean Khanate - there was one of the provinces Ottoman Empire, in which the Turkish garrisons stood and the Ottoman governor sat. Does anyone have the desire to reproach Castro for not being able to capture a tiny American base on his island?

The Ottoman Empire, by this time, was actively expanding in all directions, conquering all the Mediterranean lands, stretching from Iran (Persia) and advancing on Europe, approaching Venice and laying siege to Vienna. In 1572, the Sultan decided to conquer, at the same time, the wild Muscovy, as the European brochures assured. 120,000 troops moved north from the Crimea, supported by 20,000 Janissaries and 200 cannons.

This is the place near the village of Molodi ... Prince Mikhailo Vorotynsky ... Near the village of Molodi, the Ottomans encountered a 50,000-strong detachment of the voivode Mikhail Vorotynsky. And the Turkish army was ... No, it was not stopped - it was completely cut out !!!

From that moment on, the offensive of the Ottomans on the neighbors stopped - and try to engage in conquests if your army was almost halved! God forbid to fight off the neighbors yourself. What do you know about this battle? Nothing? Here's something! Wait, in 20 years, about the participation of Russians in the Second World War, they will also begin to “forget” in textbooks. After all, all "progressive mankind" has long and firmly known that Hitler was defeated by the Americans. And it's time to correct Russian textbooks that are "wrong" in this area.

Information about the Battle of Molodi can generally be classified as closed. God forbid, the Russian cattle learns that it can also be proud of the deeds of its ancestors in the Middle Ages! He will develop an incorrect self-consciousness, love for the Motherland, for its deeds. And this is wrong. So, it is difficult to find data about the Battle of Moldody, but it is possible - in specialized reference books. For example, in the "Encyclopedia of weapons" of Kosmet three lines are written.

So, 5:0 in favor of the West.

Stupid Russian bums. Remembering the Mongol invasion, I always wonder - where did they manage to get so many sabers? After all, sabers were forged only starting from the 14th century, and only in Moscow and Dagestan, in Kubachi. Such a strange fork - forever we are unexpectedly the same with the Dagestanis. Although, in all textbooks, there are always a couple of hostile states between us. Nowhere else in the world have they learned how to forge sabers - this is a much more complex art than it might seem.

But there was progress, 17th century. The saber gave way to other weapons. Before the birth of Peter 1, there was very little left. What was Russia like? If you believe the textbooks, approximately the same as in Tolstoy's novel "Peter the Great" - patriarchal, ignorant, wild, drunk, inert ...

Do you know that it was Russia that armed the whole of Europe with advanced weapons? Every year, Russian monasteries and foundries sold hundreds of cannons, thousands of muskets, edged weapons there. Source - here is a quote from the Encyclopedia of Arms:

Chugan cannon. These were sold to wild Europeans ...

“It is interesting that in the 16th-17th centuries artillery guns were produced not only by the sovereign Pushkar courts, but also by monasteries. For example, a fairly large-scale production of cannons was carried out in the Solovetsky Monastery and in the Kirillovo-Belozersky Monastery. They owned cannons and used them very successfully by the Don and Zaporozhye Cossacks. The first mention of the use of cannons by Zaporozhye Cossacks dates back to 1516. In the 19th-20th centuries, in Russia and abroad, there was an opinion that pre-Petrine artillery was technically backward. But here are the facts: in 1646, the Tula-Kamensky factories delivered more than 600 guns to Holland, and in 1647, 360 guns of 4.6 and 8 pounds caliber. In 1675, the Tula-Kamensky factories shipped abroad 116 cast-iron cannons, 43892 cannonballs, 2934 grenades, 2356 musket barrels, 2700 swords and 9687 pounds of iron "

Here you have the wild backward Russia, about which they say at school.

6:0 in favor of the West.

By the way, from time to time, I meet Russophobes who claim that all of the above cannot be, since even the highly progressive and developed England and France learned to cast iron only in the 19th century. In such cases, I bet on a bottle of cognac and take a person to the Artillery Museum in St. Petersburg. One of the cast-iron cannons, cast in 1600, lies there cheekily on a stand for all to see. I have already accumulated 3 bottles of cognac in the bar, but they still don’t believe me. People do not believe that Russia throughout its history and in all respects overtook Europe by about two centuries. But…

Loser's conclusions. Starting from school years, we are told that our whole history is like a huge cesspool, in which there is not a single bright spot, not a single decent ruler. There were either no military victories at all, or they led to something bad (the victory over the Ottomans is hidden like nuclear launch codes, and the victory over Napoleon is duplicated by the slogan Alexander - the gendarme of Europe). Everything that was invented by the ancestors is either brought to us from Europe, or just a baseless myth. The Russian people did not make any discoveries, they did not free anyone, and if someone turned to us for help, it was enslavement.

And now everyone around has the historical right of Russians to kill, rob, rape. If you kill a Russian person, this is not banditry, but a desire for freedom. And the destiny of all Russians is to repent, repent and repent.

The information war against Russia has been going on for many centuries ... A little more than a hundred years information war- and in all of us the feeling of our own inferiority has already been sown. We are more, like our ancestors, not sure of our own rightness. Look what is happening with our politicians: they are constantly making excuses. No one is demanding that Lord Judd be brought to justice for promoting terrorism and collaborating with bandits - he is being persuaded that he is not quite right.

We threaten Georgia - and do not carry out threats. Denmark spits in our face - and even sanctions are not imposed against it. Baltic countries established an apartheid regime - politicians bashfully turn away. People demand to allow the sale of weapons for self-defense - they are openly called useless cretins who, out of stupidity, will immediately kill each other.

Why should Russia justify itself? After all, she is always right! No one else dares to say it.

You think - just the current politicians are so indecisive, but instead of them, just about, others will come. But that will NEVER happen. Because the feeling of inferiority is laid not on a post of the Minister of Foreign Affairs. It begins to be systematically brought up from childhood, when the child is told: our grandfathers were very stupid, stupid people, incapable of the most elementary decisions. But a kind and smart uncle Rurik came to them from Europe, began to master them and teach them. He created for them the state of Russia, in which we live.

And do you know that royal rule in Russia was not inherited before Christianization?

In Russia, they lived according to Kopnoy Pravo, where only those who, not by word, but by deed, had a voice, proved that he was normal smart man, a family man, not a drunk or some kind of lazybones. A handicraft craftsman, such as a woodworker. Here are 10 such men unanimously (!) chose the tenth, the tenths chose the sotsky, etc. to the Monarch, whose power was not inherited! Those. the best of the best was chosen, and when they saw him, the people said Tse Zarya (TSE (tse - this, this one) ZARYA (Dawn - Carrying Light)), which later was reduced to “King”. Children born from kings were called Tse Sarevich (Tse Zarevich). That is, it is the same as the son of the dawn. From the Etruscans (the Russian ethnic group is one of our clans), the Latins adopted this concept and called their rulers Caesar (Caesar). That's where there was freedom of speech, will and democracy of elections.

And who teaches us democracy today? Those who a thousand years ago imposed monarchy and totalitarianism.

About taxes in Russia

The tax was in the form of a tithe, i.e. everyone paid tithes. Those. 10th part of 144. Now instead of 144, 100 (%) is taken. In order to recalculate the tithe in a modern way, we will make up the proportion: 144/10 \u003d 100 / x. Hence x = 10 100/144 = 7 (%). The tithe went to the maintenance of the Cossacks (“the sighted horse”) and the construction of border towns to protect our lands from invaders. One of the camps of the Cossacks is now called KazakhStan, this happened after the October Revolution, although even before the revolution it was called Kazaksky Stan (KazakStan). The Cossacks were skilled warriors, and they were even hired by the Japanese emperors, the samurai probably did not reach the level of our Ancestors.

History of Russia

Our modern official history, taught in schools, took its final form in the 18th and 19th centuries AD. and was written in accordance with the biblical concept of history commissioned by the Romanovs. Thus, today we are taught from childhood that our history is only a little over 1000 years old. Allegedly, the brothers Cyril and Methodius did good to the dark and wild pagans, giving them writing.

Let's see what happened and who and how falsified our past.

Let's start with Tsar Peter the Great, who instead of “Summer” introduced the “Year” and in Summer 7208 from S.M.Z.Kh (Creation of the World in the Star Temple, where the creation of the world used to mean the signing of a peace treaty) On December 20, Peter I postponed the New Year by issuing a decree to congratulate each other on January 1 “with the new Got”, and to introduce a new foreign Julian calendar, where after December 31, 7208 from S.M. January 1, 1700 began from the birth of Christ. Thus, he easily and simply stole 5508 years of history from us.

Since our Ancestors wrote the numbers in drop caps, our writing has at least existed for more than 7.5 thousand years, which Catherine II wrote in her “Notes on Russian History”: “... the Slavs had a written language older than Nestor ...”.

But the worst thing was during Christianization, when in Russia the monuments of pre-Christian writing and culture of ancient Russia-Russia-Rasseniya were subjected to total destruction.

About the "Great" Prince Vladimir Krasno Solnyshko

The illegitimate son of the Khazar woman Malusha, Prince Vladimir, who illegally occupied the throne of Kyiv (by poisoning the legitimate heirs), introduced an alien religion with fire and sword. In the years from 988 to 1000, ¾ of the population was destroyed Kievan Rus, after which only 3 million people remained from the original 12 million. The survivors were mostly children and the elderly. Children deprived of parents were brought up in a Christian spirit, with the denial of the entire great Heritage of the Ancestors.

The Higher Clergy of Belovodye (the center of Belovodye was in Asgard, modern Omsk), the sacred land of Russenia-Rus-Russia in 1222 from the RH decided to create a special governing body to protect the Old Faith, which became known as: OR-DEN, which meant “Strength Light” or “Light Force”, where the Kh'ary rune “OR” meant “strength” in the Old Slavic language, the rune “DEN” meant “light”. This Light Power came from beyond the Urals in the form of retribution to the Russian lands, devastated and captured by the Greek-Jewish-Christian.

Tatar-Mongol yoke

This word “Order” was distorted by the Latins as “Orde”, and the writers of history changed it to the word “horde” and the Great Horde or the Mongol-Tatar yoke appeared. Foreigners called Russia Mongolia. The very name “Mongolia” (or Mogolia, as Karamzin and many other authors write, for example) comes from the Greek word “Megalion”, i.e. "Great". In Russian historical sources, the word "Mongolia" ("Mogolia") is not found. But meets " Great Russia". The word "Igo" means order, hence the name "Igor" - the guardian of order. “Tat” is an enemy, i.e. the Tatar is the enemy of the Aryan. And to whom could the Aryan be an enemy? Could he be an enemy of the Rasichs, i.e. to their brothers in the Clans of the Great RACE? No. The only one to whom he was an enemy was those who wanted to enslave these Rods. That is why they write in their history (from tori-ya) that to Russia (and they considered only Kiev and the surrounding lands to be Russia, and “Kievan Rus” was invented by M. Pogodin, who in his dissertation “On the Origin of Russia” ( 1825), as well as Messrs. G. Bayer, later G. Miller and A. Schlozer substantiated the Norman theory of the emergence of Russian statehood: “come and rule us”), the Great Horde went, or in other words - the Mongols-Tatars - the Great Enemies of the Aryans, not who accepted Christianity. And they went from the East of Rasseniya (Rasseniya are the territories over which the Clans of the Great Race settled), more precisely from Siberia, which in those days from the Urals to the Pacific Ocean and from the Cold Ocean to Central India was called Tarkhtaria, the land of which is patronized by the Gods - the son and daughter of Perun, brother and sister, Tarkh, nicknamed Dazhdbog (Giving God), and his younger sister Tara. Our Ancestors told foreigners: "... we are the children of Tarkh and Tara ...". Later, Tarkhtaria became Tartaria, and the biblical people, who hardly pronounce the letter “r”, called it Tataria.

Let's look at the map of 1754 "I-e Carte de l'Asie"

Through the entire vast territory of the Russian Empire, up to Pacific Ocean, including Mongolia, the Far East, etc., there is an inscription in large letters: Grande Tartaria, that is, Great Tartaria.

Now it is clear that the words “Tatar” and “Tatar” had nothing to do with modern Tatars until, after the revolution of 1917, historians of biblical nationality decided to falsify the “trace of the Mongol-Tatar yoke”, so that by another deception, substitution of concepts, to confirm his fictional story about the invasion of Russia by a never-existing enemy and avert suspicion from himself as a real enemy.

This plan to announce someone former enemy they carried out for about a decade and a half, and Lazar Moiseevich Koganovich completed it in 1935, declaring several peoples to be Tatars: the Volga Bulgarians or Bulgars, baptized people, Uighurs, and also Siberians. Thus, in recent history, another substitution of names and concepts was carried out.

Once, in the northeast of the Black Sea, there was Khazaria, which undertook predatory and predatory attacks on neighboring peoples. Once Khazaria seized the Volga lands with their peace-loving peoples and subjugated them. But part of the Volga Bulgars did not want to submit to the power of the Khazars, and they, together with their khan (i.e. military leader) Astarukh, moved to the Danube, built their cities there and still live there - these territories are called Bulgaria. But notice, the Danube Bulgarians modern historiography ranks among the Slavs, and their eastern brothers - the Volga, Kazan Bulgarians - to the Turks - to the Tatars.

What caused this division? Yes, due to the fact that from Tsar-grad Christianity was imposed on the Danube, and Islam was imposed to the Volga. And since in ancient times Islam was accepted mainly by Turkic tribes, therefore, the Volga Bulgarians began to be classified as Turks, although they were actually Slavic tribes that at first did not accept Christianity, but then Islam was forcibly imposed on many of their tribes.

However, among them there were tribes that did not recognize either Islam or Christianity, and many, especially along the Vyatka and higher, and closer to the Caspian Sea, remained on their ancient faith of the Ancestors and lived apart. Therefore, they still call themselves White Bulgarians.

Why don't modern Russian children get this knowledge at school?

Yes, again, because the modern official version of the history of the Russian people was finally formalized in the 18-19th century and was written in strict accordance with the biblical picture of the world: they say that there is the most ancient, God's chosen people - the Jews, and the Russians were Greeks (Semites) before they were Christianized ) by wild pagans, and even writing was given to the Russians by the Greek monks Cyril and Methodius.

In fact, the semi-literate monks Cyril and Methodius reduced Slavic initial letter(I Know God, I Know the Verb Good ... - one of the types of our writing that existed in Russia many thousands of years before Christ) from 49 letters to 44, and four of the remaining letters were given Greek names in which there are no such sound images. It was precisely those letters from the old Initial Letter that were destroyed that did not find a match in the Greek language.

Greek is built on the basis of simplified Phoenician, and Phoenician is based on Scythian, and Scythian is our Slavic, because. Scythians are one of the Slavic tribes. Yaroslav the Wise with his "wisdom" removed one more letter. The reformer Peter the Great removed five letters, Nicholas II - three, Lunacharsky - three, introduced "Yo" and removed images from the ABC (Az, Buki, Vedi ...) and introduced phonemics (a, b, c ...) and the ABC became the Alphabet (alpha + vita - in the Greek manner) and our mighty language became without figurative (ugly).

Materials taken from the site energodar.net/nasledie/tartariya.html

Our workshop produces wooden blanks for painting in Nizhny Novgorod region. RuTvor wooden blanks are ideal for creativity, for painting, burning, decoupage, in a word - for everything you may need them for. Wooden blanks RuTvor differ in quality and low price, because. blanks from the manufacturer. You can order and buy wooden blanks cheaply and in bulk.

„Before us, the land of Rus was not a thousand years old,
but there were many thousands, and there will be more,
for we have guarded our land from enemies!”

Prince Kiy

INTRODUCTION

Being engaged in the study of the history of my native country, I had the opportunity to get acquainted with a sufficient number of materials that illuminate the distant past of Russia in various aspects.

In the printed literature there are a large number of interpretations of the origin and evolution of the Russian people and the emergence of the first statehood on Russian soil.

This is a natural process when researchers try to get to the bottom of the truth. Means, many of them are not satisfied with the status quo in Russian history, which means that there are enough facts that do not fit into the version of the history of the Russian state proposed by academic science.

But what does our science suggest? The clearest example of an academic point of view on Russian history is the book “History. Full course "(multimedia tutor for preparing for the exam, edition 2013).

In introducing this book, I will simply quote a few passages from it that will enable you, the reader, to understand the essence of the academic concept of the history of Russia, offered by our the science . I would add that he not only proposes, but also defends his point of view with all the administrative resources available to science.

So I'm quoting...

« The ancient history of the Slavs contains a lot MYSTERIES (highlighted by the author and further), but from the standpoint of modern historians, it boils down to the following.

First, in the III - the middle of the II millennium BC. SOME Proto-Indo-European community from UNCLEAR areas around the Black Sea (possibly from the peninsula of Asia Minor) moved to Europe».

And further. " There are several versions of historians about the place where exactly the Slavic community was formed.(theories of the emergence of the Slavs): the first was put forward by the Carpatho-Danubian theory(homeland of the Slavs - the area between the Carpathians and the Danube), in the 20th century was born and became the main Vistula-Oder theory(Slavs arose north of the Carpathians), then academician B. Rybakov put forward a compromise theory, according to which the Slavs arose SOMEWHERE in Eastern Europe - from the Elbe to the Dnieper. Finally, there is a version that the Eastern Black Sea region was the ancestral home of the Slavs, and their ancestors are one of the branches of the Scythians - the Scythians-plowmen». Etc.

To this it is also necessary to add the explanation of the name of the Slavs produced in the book - “comes from the words“ word ”and“ know ”, that is, it means people whose language is understandable, in contrast to“ Germans ”(as if dumb) - this is how the Slavs called foreigners" . Agree, all this is very interesting and even entertaining.

I don’t know about you, dear reader, but all these arguments like - MYSTERIES, SOME, UNCLEAR, SOMEWHERE, not only do not satisfy, but also suggest that this is some kind of deliberate distortion of the existing facts.

I proceed from the fact that academic science must have the strength and means to sort it out and bring clarity and certainty to our history. Judging by the above, there is no clarity, and no certainty. Why does science not, and I have, although not complete, but extensive information about the ancient history of the Russian people. And I set out my concept of Russian history in the manuscript "On the Ancient History of Russia."

Is there really not a single patriot among our Russian historians, not a single decent person who would criticize the lies that have been imposed on us all for about 300 years, and who would professionally unravel the “riddles” posed by science. Otherwise, it is not science. What I have presented to you above cannot be called science.

Where in the word SLAVS Is there or is the meaning of "word"??? How can you conclude that there is SLAVS meanings of "know"??? SLAVS means "glorious". This is the direct and most correct message that comes to mind, and this meaning is already about 5 thousand years old (if not more). And that's why "glorious", this must be dealt with. But we have an answer to this question.

In the same place in the book "History. Full course" explained VERSIONS origin of the word "Rus": ":... or from the name of the river Ros - the right tributary of the Dnieper(this version was proposed by academician B. Rybakov, but today it is considered obsolete), or from the name of the Varangians(according to the chronicle of Nestor), or from the word roots, which means"ship rowers" which was then converted to"ruotsi" (modern version)."

Dear gentlemen, scientists - be afraid of God! Talk about such things in the 21st century. And the worst thing is that our children are stuffed with all this, deliberately forming in them an inferiority complex and dependence on the West.

The book below notes. " The most important source on the events of Russian history from ancient times to the beginning of the XII century. - the first Russian chronicle(the oldest surviving) - "The Tale of Bygone Years", the first edition of which was created by the monk of the Kiev-Pechora monastery Nestor around 1113.". And on this "document"(why in quotes will be clear a bit later) academic science is building its own concept of the history of Russia.

Yes, there are many other interesting documents that cover our ancient history. But for some reason, it is the chronicle of Nestor that is the main one for academicians.

Let's see what historians rely on in their delusion. The main message of official science is this. The Russian princely dynasty originated in Novgorod.

In 859, the northern Slavic tribes drove the Varangians-Normans (“northern people”) overseas, immigrants from Scandinavia, who shortly before imposed tribute on them. However, internecine wars begin in Novgorod. To stop the bloodshed, in 862, at the invitation of the Novgorodians, the Varangian prince Rurik came to "reign". The Norman squad with its leader was a stabilizing factor in the struggle for power between the boyar clans.

To this point of view, we put forward our counterarguments here, refuting the dogmas of academic science:

The Russian princely dynasty was born long before the appearance of Rurik in Novgorod. Before that, Gostomysl ruled there, who was the 19th (!!!) prince from the famous prince Vandal (Vandalary - born in 365)

Rurik was the grandson of Gostomysl (the son of the middle daughter of Gostomysl), which means that Rurik was Russian by blood.

There were no internecine wars in Novgorod. After the death of Gostomysl, his eldest grandson Vadim sat down to reign there. And Rurik was invited only to reign in Ladoga.

Rurik's squad was a destabilizing factor in Russia, with the help of which Rurik and his relatives seized power in Novgorod by force.

It would not occur to a single sane person to invite an unfamiliar person who has nothing to do with the current dynasty of princes, and even more so from some Normans who had just been expelled from the country across the sea and who were paid tribute.

All presented arguments will be revealed a little later. But even this is enough to demonstrate that the “most important source” of academic science does not correspond in its content to real events. It can also be briefly added to this for the time being that Dir and Askold had nothing to do with Rurik, they were not Varangians, let alone brothers, as our historical science presents us.

What is the "Tale of Bygone Years"? This is most likely a literary work, not a chronicle.

The focus of the chronicler Nestor is the baptism of Russia by Prince Vladimir of the Rurik dynasty. All events before the baptism prepare the reader for this climax, all subsequent events remind of its importance. Russia, as it were, emerges from the darkness of past non-existence shortly before its baptism.

The author of The Tale is little interested in the pre-Christian past of the Slavs, although at that time, 1000 years before us, he probably had historical information, various myths and legends, and possibly manuscripts inherited from the pagan era. It is on such materials and information that have been preserved since those times that we will further build the real history of ancient Russia. It turns out that Nestor deliberately distorted the history of the Russian people, in other words, he was fulfilling someone's order.

Move on. Since the chronicle speaks of the events of the 12th century, the author lived no earlier. But at the same time, the question arises: how could the author, living in a Kiev monastery in the 12th century, know what happened in Veliky Novgorod in the 9th century, given the enormous difficulties of the then roads and the “illiteracy” of the whole country?

There is only one answer - no way! !! And therefore, the entire Nestor Chronicle is a simple writing from the words of other people or according to rumors and later times. And this is convincingly proved in the book by S. Valyansky and D. Kalyuzhny “The Forgotten History of Russia”.

It says that “the oldest of all the lists of The Tale of Bygone Years” - Radzivilovskiy - was made only at the beginning of the 17th century. Its pages contain traces of the rough work of a forger who tore out one sheet, inserted a sheet about the calling of the Varangians and prepared a place for inserting the lost “chronological sheet”. And this material, fabricated by someone, is taken as a source of knowledge???

And it will be even more surprising for the reader to find out at the same time that he found this list, i.e. presented to the whole world, our Tsar Peter Alekseevich, about whom there have long been rumors in well-known circles that the Tsar is “not real”. I mean the moment of the “substitution” of the real Tsar Peter, who went to study in Holland, accompanied by 20 (!!!) noble children, and returned from there with only one Menshikov, while all the rest either died or disappeared into prime of life in Holland. Interesting, isn't it.

In their study, S. Valyansky and D. Kalyuzhny highlighted another interesting fact in the annals, which concerns the puberty of our ancestors.

It turns out that compared with other princely dynasties, such as Germany and England, "our princes in the period from the 10th to the 12th centuries reached puberty only in the thirtieth year of their life." This is so late in comparison with other dynasties that "it is impossible to believe such a chronology, which means that the chronicles depicting the activities of representatives of these dynasties cannot be considered reliable."

There are other important points related to the content of the chronicle. For example, in the annals of Nestor, information about comets, eclipses of the moon and the sun was not noted or shifted in time. Also in the annals there is no information about the Crusades and, especially, about the "liberation of the Holy Sepulcher from the hands of the infidels." " What monk would not rejoice over this and would not devote not one, but many pages to this day as a joyful event for the entire Christian world?»

But if the chronicler did not see the celestial eclipses that took place before his eyes, and did not know about the events that thundered throughout the world during his lifetime, then how could he know anything about the prince who was called 250 years before him? In any case, the so-called "initial chronicle" passes entirely to the position of the late apocrypha", i.e. works, the authorship of which is not confirmed and is unlikely. Here are the things.

Let us also refer to the opinion of our first historian V. Tatishchev. He noted that "all Russian historians revered Nestor, the chronicler, as the first and main writer." But V. Tatishchev did not understand why Nestor himself did not mention any ancient authors, including Bishop Joachim.

V. Tatishchev was sure, and according to the legends, it was clear that the ancient stories were written, but did not reach us. The historian believed unequivocally that long before Nestor there were writers, for example, Joachim of Novgorod. But for some reason his story remained unknown to Nestor.

And quite certainly according to V. Tatishchev that Polish authors had (i.e., existed) Joachim’s story, since many cases were not mentioned by Nestor, but northern (Polish) authors did. V. Tatishchev also noted that “ all the manuscripts that he had, although they had a beginning from Nestor, but in the continuation, none of them exactly converged with the other, one thing, another added or reduced ».

E. Klassen analyzed in detail the question of what is the basis of the conviction about the beginning of the independence of the Russian people or about its statehood only from the time of Rurik's calling. On the annals of Nestor or on the conclusion about his legend L. Schlozer.

From the chronicle, the author himself believed, it is clearly and undoubtedly evident that the tribes that called the Varangians, lead a political life, state, since they already made up a union, a community of 4 tribes - Russia, Chud, Slavs, Krivichi, occupying up to 1 million square miles in the northeastern corner of Europe and having cities - Novgorod, Staraya Ladoga, Staraya Rusa, Smolensk, Rostov, Polotsk, Belozersk, Izborsk, Lyubech, Pskov, Vyshgorod, Pereyaslavl.

The Bavarian geographer counted 148 (!) Cities of the Eastern Slavs. Among the savages, E. Klassen believed, and we agree with him, living on such a stretch, one cannot even assume mutual relations, much less unity of thoughts, which was expressed by Russia, Chud, Slavs and Krivichi regarding the summoning of princes to the throne . And the most important thing, savages don't have cities!

S. Lesnoy also mentioned Nestor in his research. He noted that " Nestor wrote not so much the history of Russia or southern Russia as the Rurik dynasty. As a comparison with the Joakimov and 3rd Novgorod chronicles shows, Nestor deliberately narrowed his history. The history of the northern, i.e. Novgorod Russia, he almost passed over in silence.

He was a chronicler of the Rurik dynasty, and his tasks did not at all include a description of other dynasties, so he omitted the history of southern Russia, which has nothing to do with the Rurik dynasty. And most importantly, information about pre-Olegovian Russia could have been preserved by pagan priests or persons who were clearly hostile to Christianity. But it was monks like Nestor who destroyed the slightest traces reminiscent of paganism ».

As well as: " Nestor kept silent about this reign(Gostomysl), just mentioning the fact. And you can understand why: he wrote the annals of the southern, Kievan, Rus, and the history of the north did not interest him. It took him away from the tasks assigned to him by the church.

This is evident from the fact that he considered Oleg the first prince in Russia. He does not consider Rurik a Russian prince, because Novgorod was not called Russian at that time, but was called Slovenian. Perhaps Nestor would not have mentioned Rurik at all if it were not for his son Igor: it was impossible not to say who his father was.

This is the actual state of affairs with our ancient history. The fundamental basis of our state history in academic science is the Tale of Bygone Years, which, in fact, is falsified document - forgery.

We consolidated this state of affairs with our history. Foreigners called by sovereigns to write Russian history. Not only did they not know Russian, but they openly despised everything Russian, the country in which they lived.

Academician L. Schlozer (1735 - 1809) can serve as the clearest example. Let's imagine one of Shlozer's "inferences" regarding the most ancient Russian history (we are talking about the 7th century!!!):

« A terrible void reigns everywhere in central and northern Russia. Nowhere is the slightest trace of cities that now adorn Russia. Nowhere is there any memorable name that would present to the spirit of the historian excellent pictures of the past. Where now beautiful fields delight the eye of a surprised traveler, there before this there were only dark forests and swampy swamps. Where now enlightened people united in peaceful societies, there lived before this wild animals and half-wild people ».

Let us briefly summarize what has been said. Nestor was the ideologist of the Rurik princes, the embodiment of their interests. Recognize that the Novgorod princes are older than the Rurikovichs, that the Russian princely dynasty existed long before Rurik, was considered unacceptable.

This undermined the Rurikovich's right to primordial power, and therefore it was mercilessly eradicated. That is why in The Tale of Bygone Years there is not a word about Slovenia and Rus, which laid the foundation for Russian statehood on the banks of the Volkhov.

In the same way, Nestor ignores the last prince of the pre-Rurik dynasty - Gostomysl, a person who is absolutely historical and mentioned in other primary sources, not to mention information from oral folk traditions.

That's why "The Tale of Bygone Years" can in no way be considered a source about our antiquity, and our historical science is obliged to recognize this fact and in the shortest possible time to create a real true story our state. Our society needs this so much, it will greatly help in the moral education of our youth, not to mention the fundamental position - without knowing the past, you cannot build the future!

On the facts of ancient Russian history and statehood among the Rus, we previously prepared two manuscripts: “On the Ancient History of Russia” and “The History of the Russ according to the Book of Veles”.

It presents convincing evidence of the high culture of the ancient Slavs and the existence of statehood among our ancestors long before the arrival of Rurik in Novgorod. In this study, it is supposed to continue work in this direction in order to present a variant of the history of the Russian people from ancient times according to the actual data.

In this work, we will rely mainly on chronicle materials that were not widely circulated and are not perceived by academic science as historical sources. Among them: "The Legend of Slovenia and Rus", "Veles Book", "Budinsky Izbornik", "Genealogy of the Slavic-Russian people, its kings, elders and princes from the progenitor Noah to the Grand Duke Rurik and the princes of Rostov", "Tales of Zahariha" other.

***

You can download the book.