To date, there are more than 5 million cases of UFO sightings, thousands of pages of previously secret documents confirming the reality of this phenomenon have been declassified. But despite the fact that UFOs quite often visit our planet, most aspects related to them remain a mystery to people.

Ufologist Leonard Stringfield received a document from a source. The intermediary who passed on the document, whom Stringfield knows well, chose to remain anonymous for fear of government reprisals. The document dated July 16, 1947 is a preliminary report on the results of the inspection of the crashed "flying disk". The accompanying letter to the report was signed by the commander of the US Air Force in 1947, General Nathan Twining.
« Preliminary report on UFO incidents in 1947
As stated in the Presidential Directive of July 9, 1947, a preliminary examination of the recovered "flying disc" and the wreckage of a possible second disc was conducted at Army General Headquarters [Eighth Air Force Headquarters in Fort Worth, Texas. - approx. author]. The information for this report was provided by the staff technical staff of the 2nd technical department and the aviation laboratory of the 3rd technical department. Additional data is provided by the scientific staff of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Air Force Scientific Advisory Department, led by Dr. Theodor von Karman.
Further analysis was carried out by the Science and Development Division.

Regarding the object under study, there is a collective opinion that the aircraft, picked up by parts of the army and air force, does not belong to American production for the following reasons:
a. The round, disc-shaped "platform" design is unlike any of the designs currently being developed by any project.

The absence of any external propulsion system, power plant, ventilation and exhaust ducts, as well as propellers or a jet engine, confirms this opinion.
German scientists from Fort Bliss and White Sands Proving Grounds cannot identify these objects as secret German weapons. True, the possibility remains that such a device was developed by the Russians. The absence of any markings, identification numbers or instructions in Cyrillic caused serious doubts among the majority that these objects were Russian-made.
Examination of the interior of the apparatus revealed the presence of a compartment similar to an atomic engine. At least that's what Dr. Oppenheimer and dr background Pocket. There is a possibility that a part of the apparatus itself constitutes a propulsion system that assigns the function of a heat exchanger to the reactor and plays the role of an energy storage device. This process is not like the release of energy in our atomic bombs.

Description of ufo

1) A donut-shaped tube, approximately thirty-five feet, made of plastic-like material, surrounds the central core. The tube turned out to be filled with a purified substance, possibly heavy water. The massive rod at the center of the tube is immersed in a coil of copper-like material that runs through the body of the tube. This may be a reactor control mechanism or a storage battery. No moving parts were found in the studied areas.

2) Activation appears to be the primary energy for the reactor electrical potential, although, at present, this is only a guess. What remains unknown is how a heavy water reactor functions in such an environment.

3) A spherical turret, approximately 10 feet in diameter, was found under the power plant. This turret is equipped with a number of devices with unusual characteristics unknown to any of our engineers. Inside the turret are four circular cavities covered with an unknown smooth material. These cavities are symmetrical to each other, but appear to be mobile. True, it is not known how. This movement is associated with a domed room above the power plant. It is believed that the main propulsion system is a bladeless turbine, similar to the current developments under the Magnat project. Dr. August Steinhoff (head of research), Dr. Werner von Braun and Dr. Theodor von Karman put forward the following theory: flying through the atmosphere, the aircraft somehow absorbs hydrogen and, in the process of induction, generates an atomic fusion reaction. For the apparatus to move, the air around it must be ionized. Linked to the surrounding "air foil", the aircraft can supposedly have an unlimited range and flight speed. This may explain the reported absence of any noise.
The living compartment is located at the top. It is round with a domed top. The absence of a canopy, observation windows, portholes or any other optical projections confirms the opinion that the device is controlled remotely.
1) Semicircular screen (possibly television).
2) The living quarters were sealed with a special hardening compound.
3) There are no traces of welding, riveting or soldering.
4) The components of the apparatus are of impeccable shape and quality
In conclusion, it remains to be noted that in this paper it is of particular interest to detailed description the internal structure of the "flying saucer" and the principle of operation aircraft. If the document is authentic, then the information contained in it can be a significant contribution to ufology and to the formation of knowledge about the technical aspects of UFOs.

How does the UFO affect earth technology?

A wide variety of UFO impacts on various types of equipment have been recorded: from the harmless rotation of compass needles to the death of an aircraft in. The force fields created by these objects can temporarily disrupt the operation of electric and mechanical clocks, the operation of radio equipment, weapon control systems, and even the power supply of entire cities, cause the internal combustion engines to stop, and, finally, attract heavy objects to the objects.

UFOs on the compasses of ships and aircraft were expressed in the fact that their arrows sometimes followed objects, as if attracted by them, or continuously rotated.

A number of cases are known in the USA and in France, when the appearance of a UFO caused a violation of the course or a stop of electric and mechanical watches.

In 1958, in Kazakhstan, a large disk swept over a group of students sitting by the fire at a height of 3 m, after which everyone's watch stopped . A similar incident occurred in 1978 with the passengers of the ship "Shota Rustaveli" in the Atlantic.

Very often, the appearance of a UFO led to the cessation of radio equipment, which began to work again as soon as the UFO left. The following examples can serve as confirmation of this:

In November 1957, at an altitude of 2-3 km above the city of Baskatong (Canada), a UFO hovered, from which a beam of light emanated. All shortwave receivers in the city immediately stopped working, but some kind of signal was heard in some of them. resembling Morse code. When the object disappeared, all receivers started working again.

In our country in October 1977, 260 km from Ryazan, when an unknown an ellipsoid-shaped object approached three military aircraft, ultra-shortwave radio communication of aircraft with each other and with the earth completely stopped, and with the removal of the object it was restored again. Cases of interruption of radio communications with the appearance of UFOs were also observed in 1954 in Marion (Virginia), in 1957 in Arrangua (Brazil) and in 1977 at the Volga floating base located in the Barents Sea.

In the newspaper Moscow News (1978.33), with reference to a number of foreign agencies it was reported that in November 1978, during the landing of a disc-shaped UFO with a transparent dome 40 km from the capital of Kuwait, not only the entire radio was disabled, but also the telephone connection of the capital of Kuwait with the outside world.

In 1957 in the city of Ringwood (Illinois), in 1959 in Salsbury (State of Carolina), and in 1963 in the city of Victoria (Australia) with the advent of UFOs, malfunctions in the operation of televisions began.

In other cases, during UFO flights, intense interference was noted in the work of radio and television stations. At the same time, it is characteristic that in the case that took place in 1968 in the city of Tismana (Romania), strong interference arose only in the longwave range , while at medium waves they were much smaller, and at short waves they were not felt at all.

There were also recorded cases of temporary suspension of the operation of radar stations when a UFO appeared, as was the case in 1950 on two American aircraft in Korea, in 1973 in the city of Columbia (Missouri), and in 1977 - on our trawler "Vasily Kiselev in the Atlantic.

In 1957, during the flight of three disk-shaped UFOs over the Brazilian city of Mochi Mirim, a complete blackout in the city was observed only under the flight path of objects, and on both sides of it weakened as they moved away. Cases where the appearance of a UFO only led to voltage drop in the network , were also recorded in 1958 in Rome, in 1969 in one of the districts of Tallinn, Mänynke, and in 1961 in the city of Lekville (Massachusetts) and in 1973 in the city of La Spezia (Italy). Moreover, during a blackout in Rome, one engineer plugged in a measuring device and found that there was voltage in it, but not enough to light the bulbs. The example below shows that UFOs can affect multiple sources of electricity at the same time.

Ufo disguise

Many UFO eyewitnesses talk about such an amazing property of unidentified objects as invisibility. Then they appear from the void, then they disappear.

In June 1966, three fireballs appeared near a farm in Aveyron, France, flying across the field towards the farm. One of these balls hovered 15 m from the house and hung motionless for 3 minutes, after which it suddenly disappeared, and after a couple of seconds reappeared a few hundred meters from the house. Such instantaneous movements continued for some time.

The press cites a case that occurred near the city of Mulhouse (France), where three young people saw an orange-red ball with a diameter of 50 m descending to the ground in a zigzag trajectory and landing in a clearing 300 m from eyewitnesses. But when they went to the ball, it immediately disappeared.

In our country in July 1979, on the road from Zlatoust to Beloretsk, three eyewitnesses who were driving a car saw a fireball the size of a two-story house approaching from behind. They looked at it for 2 minutes, after which the ball suddenly disappeared, and after 2-3 minutes it reappeared, but already in front of the car, and hovered motionless for a while, after which it also suddenly disappeared.

At first, attempts were made to explain these properties of UFOs by the peculiarities of their kinematics. It was assumed that these objects suddenly disappear from view due to the fact that they break away from their place at great speed. And their sudden appearance was explained by the arrival with the same lightning speed and an instantaneous stop. The example below to some extent confirms the possibility of such an assumption.

In June 1968, in Dax (France), the spouses Zh., driving a car at a speed of 110 km / h, suddenly saw a dark hemispherical object with a flashing red light in front of them in the middle of the road. They braked sharply - a collision seemed inevitable - and, as it were, drove through this object without feeling anything. Apparently, at the very last moment, he really took off with lightning speed and disappeared. Traces of it, later discovered at the landing site, confirmed that it was not a mirage.

The ability of UFOs to become invisible to the human eye is also confirmed by the following cases, when after the development of photographs of a “clear” sky or a “clean” area, UFOs were found on them.

In August 1979, the Riga cameraman Pipars, while on a fishing boat in the Greenland Sea, took 12 color photographs of the night sky and the dark sea with the lights of ships in the night. What was his surprise when, after the manifestation, he saw in four of the twelve photographs a bright elongated glow that occupied almost half of the sky in the frames and gradually changed its shape.

In September 1983, not far from Ai-Petri, Ryzhkov, a Rostovite, took five photographs of the surrounding area, and when he developed the film, he was surprised to see a large dark object hovering over the top of the mountain and flying over the highway in three photographs.

In August 1979, the Polish fishing boat "Hel-127" was at sea near the Hel Peninsula. Suddenly, an unknown fiery red pulsing object the size of a soccer ball appeared above the surface of the sea. The skipper of the boat Schomborg felt a strange numbness, chest pain and began to lose his sight. At the same time, he began to experience such fear, which he did not know even in the strongest storm. The helmsman Elvart also became numb and even dropped the helm, and the other two members of the team, Figursky and Bona, went out onto the bridge and felt severe pain in their temples. A strange ball accompanied the boat for 20 minutes, then lagged behind, but Schomborg still had a feeling of some incomprehensible fear for a long time.

Perhaps this feeling of fear is caused by the radiation emanating from the UFO. Experiments carried out in different countries have shown that, getting into the electromagnetic field of a certain, very high frequency, a person begins to experience a feeling of fear and depression. There are also cases when a UFO or the rays emanating from it brought eyewitnesses into a state of strong excitement. Sometimes close encounters with UFOs ended for eyewitnesses with more serious consequences associated with a strong nervous shock, causing general violation mental state.

In February 1975, a resident of the French city of Reunion Severin, after a short stay in the vicinity of a hovering at low altitude strange object, similar to a hat, temporarily lost the power of speech, and then his eyesight. And only a week later, when his condition improved somewhat and his speech was restored, Severen was able to tell the gendarmes what had happened to him.

Sometimes UFOs seem to affect the subconscious of eyewitnesses, and this effect continues for some time after the encounter with the UFO. . This is expressed in the fact that in a number of cases people who were in close proximity to these objects remember everything that happened to them before and after the meeting with the UFO, but what happened during the meeting itself completely disappears from their memory. Sometimes this gap can be restored with the help of the so-called regressive hypnosis. Foreign sources give a number of examples when people subjected to regressive hypnosis recalled everything that happened to them during a meeting with a UFO. However, experts in hypnosis point out that there is no complete certainty that the picture being restored by the hypnotized corresponds to the truth, and is not induced by their subconscious. Along with this, there are also cases when, even with the help of hypnosis, it was not possible to make eyewitnesses remember what happened to them during the time when their consciousness was turned off. And in some cases, eyewitnesses themselves, without any hypnosis, gradually recalled all the circumstances of their meeting with a UFO.

Types of UFOs and their appearance

A comprehensive study of the properties of "behavior" and the size of UFOs, regardless of their shape, allows us to conditionally divide them into four main types.

First: Very small objects, which are balls or discs with a diameter of 20-100 cm, which fly at low altitudes, sometimes fly out of and return to larger objects. There is a well-known case that took place in October 1948 in the Fargo airbase area (North Dakota), when the pilot Gormon unsuccessfully pursued a round luminous object with a diameter of 30 cm, which very skillfully maneuvered, evading the chase, and sometimes he himself rapidly moved towards the plane, forcing Gormone to dodge the collision

Second: Small UFOs that are egg-shaped and disc-shaped and 2-3 m in diameter. They usually fly at low altitude and most often make landings. Small UFOs have also been repeatedly seen separating from and returning to the main objects.

The third: The main UFOs, most often disks with a diameter of 9-40 m, the height of which in the central part is 1/5-1/10 of their diameter. The main UFOs make independent flights in any layers of the atmosphere and sometimes land. Smaller objects can be separated from them.

Fourth: Large UFOs, usually in the form of cigars or cylinders, 100-800 meters or more long. They appear mainly in upper layers atmosphere, do not perform complex maneuvers, and sometimes hang on high altitude. There were no cases of their landing on the ground, but it was repeatedly observed how small objects separated from them. There is an assumption that large UFOs can fly in space. There are also isolated cases of observing giant disks with a diameter of 100-200 m. Such an object was observed during a test flight of the French Concorde aircraft at an altitude of 17,000 m above the Republic of Chad during the solar eclipse of June 30, 1973. The crew and a group of scientists who were on the plane filmed and took a series of color photographs of a luminous mushroom-cap-shaped object 200 m in diameter and 80 m high, which followed an intersecting course. At the same time, the contours of the object were fuzzy, since it was apparently surrounded by an ionized plasma cloud.

eyewitness stories

In February 1963, in the state of Victoria (Australia), at a height of 300 m above a tree, a disk 8 m in diameter with a rod resembling an antenna hung. Africa is a spherical object, in the lower part of which three antenna-like structures were visible. Cases have also been recorded when these rods moved or rotated.

Below are two such examples.

In August 1976, Muscovite A.M. Troitsky and six other witnesses saw a silvery metal object over the Pirogov reservoir, eight times the size of the lunar disk, slowly moving at a height of several tens of meters. Two rotating stripes were visible on its side surface. When the object was above the witnesses, a black hatch opened in its lower part, from which a thin cylinder protruded. The lower part of this cylinder began to describe circles, while top part remained attached to the object.

In July 1978, passengers on the Sevastopol-Leningrad train near Kharkov watched for several minutes how some kind of rod with three brightly luminous dots emerged from the upper part of a motionlessly hanging elliptical UFO. This rod was deflected to the right three times and returned to its previous position. Then a rod with one luminous dot extended from the bottom of the UFO.

Inside the lower part of the UFO, there are sometimes three or four landing legs, which extend during landing and retract inward during takeoff. Here are three examples of such observations.

In November 1957, Senior Lieutenant N., returning from Stead Air Force Base (Las Vegas), saw four disk-shaped UFOs with a diameter of 15 m on the field, each of which stood on three landing legs. As they took off, those props retracted inward before his eyes.

In July 1970, a young Frenchman, Erien J., near the village of Jabrel-le-Bord, clearly saw how four metal supports, ending in rectangles, gradually retracted into a round UFO with a diameter of 6 m that took off.

In the USSR in June 1979 in the city of Zolochev, Kharkov region, the witness Starchenko observed how a UFO landed 50 meters from him in the form of an overturned saucer with a number of portholes and a dome. When the object descended to a height of 5-6 m, three landing legs about 1 m long telescopically extended from its bottom, ending in a kind of blades. After standing on the ground for about 20 minutes, the object took off, and it was clear how the supports were drawn into its body.

What is the engine of the UFO? That's a very difficult question. Numerous “thought experiments” have been conducted by scientists and amateurs alike on how aliens can work. spaceships(on paper, since both amateurs and scientists do not have the appropriate hardware).

Many books on the subject were written by Paul R. Hill in 1995, James McCampbell (70s), Leonard J. Cramp (1966), Plantier (1953). They all approached the UFO phenomenon from the point of view of the "mad scientist" craft, and their theories to explain the maneuvering. alien ships based on the idea that the source of their movement is rigidly tied to the ship.

You will be interested:

Other engineers and physicists who take a public and ongoing interest in the subject of UFOs, or speculate about how they might work, are: Hermann Oberth; James E. McDonald; James Harder; Harley D. Rutledge; Jack Sarfatti; Harold Puthoff; Claude Poer, who in the late 1970s led GEPAN, a French government project to study unidentified objects, and many others. This article summarizes what we humans know about UFO engines.

Physical aspect

If we want to explain UFOs in terms of physics, which we understand, but in doing so we rely on observations, then, apparently, we can assume that they are capable of generating artificial gravitational fields(in terms general theory relativity - to manipulate the curvature of the fabric of space-time), just as we produce magnetism with electric currents.

Bright light

It is believed that the glow of different colors around the UFO is due to the ionization of the surrounding air. The atmosphere around them seems to “light up”, this is very similar to what is happening in neon lamps. This is a kind of "plasma shell". Changes in the brightness and color of the "plasma shell" are apparently related to the operation of the engine.

Ionization of air and radiation

Air ionization appears to be caused by electromagnetic radiation emitted by ships and is thought to be a secondary effect of the propulsion system. This includes ultraviolet radiation (as evidenced by many cases of eye and skin irritation of people who have personally observed alien ships) and soft x-rays (as evidenced by traces of a “burn ring” on the ground where flying saucers landed). Given the difficulty of generating plasma under normal atmospheric conditions, combined with other observations such as the luminosity of underwater UFOs, the sudden appearance of condensation/fog on launch under high humidity and no noise suggests a shell with a lower density than the atmosphere around flying saucers.

The material presented here sometimes contradicts itself. I deliberately do not remove these contradictions - let everyone try to find for himself what he likes and awakens technical thought.

In a nutshell, here is the real design of the flying saucer engine. Perhaps not quite Schauberger. It's interesting though, sometimes some ideas pop up. Different people, in different places, different times, and similar thoughts come. Either people are the same, or the laws of nature. Would you believe that I have never read or even heard about the works of Schauberger before (I mean his engine that runs on the energy of the environment, and besides, it has levitating properties)? But when by chance (thanks to the Internet) I came across a description of his designs, I was simply amazed how much what I have been thinking about for a long time is similar to his ideas. Externally, the Schauberger engine looks like this:

Its internal structure is as follows (turned upside down in relation to the photographs):

So that you understand that I do not cling to someone else's glory, I will try to explain its device in the simplest language, because nowhere is it really described how it works, despite its seemingly rather extensive representation on the Internet. In some places, the opinion slips that this engine is generally a hoax and cannot work at all. But I think it's not. I'll try to explain. Undoubtedly, the main part of the engine is this strange at first glance wheel (in the figure above it is marked on the left with an incomprehensible inscription, obviously "turbine").

Despite the apparent complexity of the main part, it can be easily manufactured. A similarity scan of such a turbine is shown below and can presumably be cut out of a metal plate 250x500 mm 1-2 mm thick and bent accordingly. The alignment of the turbine will occur automatically during rotation (it is proposed to attach the turbine to the axis of the motor-generator using 3 radial springs at 120 degrees - the turbine will "self" find its center of rotation).

The turbine itself will look like a jester's crown. It is the "jester" and not the "king" - I apologize for such a non-normative term-comparison. But in my opinion, this is the most convenient way to explain that the turbine has helical blades, radially curved from the center to the periphery.

At first glance - some kind of devilry of 24 corkscrews rotating around the circumference for opening bottles. Why is this needed? Here I link to my own site for a chapter on the origin of tornadoes. Schauberger, in this design of his, created ideal conditions for the formation of a group of mini-tornadoes and the central tornado itself, which is the driving force of this design. Air at the first stage with the help of such a wheel is twisted around the axis of the electric motor. But the same air, when thrown to the periphery due to centrifugal force, passes through the corkscrews of the wheel and receives rotation along the axis of each of the 24 corkscrews. Air swirls around 2 axes of rotation at the same time. A rotation simultaneously around 2 axes this is such an amazing thing! Try to pick up a high-speed electric motor with a handwheel on the axis and rotate it around the axis of your own hand. Very interesting sensations. When turning the motor, forces are felt that act in completely different directions than you expect.

So this wheel forms 24 mini-tornadoes, which, bending around the inner surface of the upper part of the engine (looks like a copper basin in the photo below), along a very interesting trajectory (still rotate the motor!) Break out onto the inner cone of the engine and move further to the outlet.

It is better to observe the process further in transverse section to understand what a tornado looks like when viewed from above. The first cut just below the "copper basin" is this cross section of a tornado. The other 2 are closer to the outlet. It was inconvenient to draw 24 balls, so I leave only 9, the principle is still the same. Moreover, this drawing somehow strangely echoes the drawing on wheat fields in England. Further, everywhere to the place and out of place, I will try to draw these wild analogies. Moreover, I saw photographs of the drawings in the margins much later than I completed all of the above. Isn't it strange: this cartoon below and the drawing on the wheat field were created absolutely independently of each other? However, even the number of minivortices coincided.

So 24(9) balls, twisted from small whirlwinds, roll inside along the wall of the circle. The walls of each ball in relation to the neighbors rotate in opposite directions. I will consider these balls as a dual medium: it seems to be a ball, since it rolls like a part of a ball bearing and the laws of mechanics apply to it, but at the same time it is air, which is subject to the laws of hydrodynamics. These balls, in any collision of a neighbor with a neighbor, have the intention to "run into" each other and thus move to the center of the structure, all at the same time (try to see this in the cartoon on the left), and at the same time, the opposite movement of the walls of the neighboring balls is according to Bernoulli's law is a rarefied medium, it turns out the balls are "attracted" to each other. As a result, all this mass of rotating air is drawn to the center, accelerates significantly (because the diameter of the structure decreases), moves lower and finally flies out through the nozzle from the bottom of the structure. The wheel with corkscrews, as it rotates, constantly feeds these mini-vortex-bearings and draws air from outside into it. Schauberger claims that this process becomes self-sustaining. Indeed, a natural tornado can exist for a long time and its very existence is obviously supported only by the presence of a pressure difference between the external environment and the inner cone of the tornado. And inside the engine, just in the center, a vacuum zone is formed. This means that the surrounding air should strive there, falling on the turbine blades with "corkscrews" and being involved in a complex rotation trajectory, which could be called a "self-turning donut". That's how it seems to me the basic principles of this engine. In my opinion, such a process can really be called some kind of opposite to a conventional explosion ( explosion), since the substance does not scatter to the sides, but vice versa strive to converge to one point(to the base of the vortex). Schauberger called this process implosion.

I drew these 3 frames with spinning balls-rollers and again a strange thought came to mind. On television again there was a story about the next appearance of unusual circles in the wheat fields of England (and not only there). But if I didn’t have an animator to illustrate my ideas, I would try to describe the contraction of the vortex to a point in the first graphics editor I came across with something like this drawing. In my opinion, this drawing on a wheat field is an unambiguous illustration of the processes taking place in a tornado and calls for the following main conclusion: the rotating minivortexes that make up a tornado are attracted to each other and tend to the main center of rotation. And here minivortices are drawn. Pay attention - next to each main circle, several additional circles are carefully drawn, directly indicating that several mini-processes are depicted here, moving in a spiral towards the center. More precisely, there are 6 of them and they work exactly as shown in my cartoon a little higher. It is absolutely certain that a volumetric process is drawn here on a plane (a whirlwind - a tornado - a tornado). Who drew it and why is a separate big question. Even during the day, creating several such geometrically accurate circles is a big problem. And draw about 400 at night? It is unlikely that just a crazy person could do this. Maybe this can be understood as a kind of drawing-hint?

Let's go back to Schauberger. Witnesses to the operation of the Schauberger engine claimed that only air and water served as fuel. Maybe they were a little wrong. Most likely it was air and obviously alcohol (by the way, it looks like water). The engine in the process of operation should literally devour the surrounding air and then it's time to put fuel on it and set it on fire, further contributing to the process of vortex formation. At in large numbers The oxygen flame of alcohol is almost invisible. So the result was a "flameless and smokeless engine" as described in some publications.

Approximately the same type of construction I came to in my conclusions and propose something remotely reminiscent of Schauberger's "windmill", the work is generally based on the same principles. I was inspired by the funnel of water pouring out of the bathroom and what happens inside the structures below follows the same laws.

The difference from the Schauberger mechanism is the absence of an external cone, along which the vortex is pulled to the center and ejected through the nozzle, as well as a simpler design of the wheel for forming a vortex (in fact, this is a conventional centrifugal pump). My simplification of Schauberger's design (the cartoon on the left) is due to the simple idea that a natural tornado does not need all such tricks (although the "corkscrew" wheel that he invented causes nothing but admiration - the simplest and most effective way spins the air flow along 2 perpendicular axes of rotation!). My task is to spin the flow into a small tornado as simply as possible and preferably with the complete absence of mechanical parts. This can be achieved by using not a centrifugal pump impeller for spinning, but by using something similar to the MHD engine described on the Electric motor page. The design is completely devoid of moving parts (with the exception of the vortex itself). It turned out something like the one shown on the right cartoon. in yellow- an attempt to depict burning fuel (possibly kerosene?). Moreover, for an MHD engine, there must be conductive kerosene (possibly salted?). Then they suggested to me that there should be a sodium additive. Roughly speaking, this is an attempt to reproduce the formidable natural phenomenon in a can. And even more precisely the process, the essence of which is clear from the bottom cartoon.

"Tornado in a glass" "Just a tornado"

For the first time, Einstein saw the left drawing in an ordinary glass with tea and floating tea leaves (let's call it Einstein's glass). Take a closer look: the central ascending part is the "tornado's trunk" (only in the left figure it raises tea leaves, and on the right there are houses and cars). It is strange that Einstein himself did not draw such conclusions. And Schauberger seems to have done it. Almost all the designs that are offered on this site are based on the process that takes place in this glass.

So to speak - some points for the main engine of a flying saucer. True, only for the atmosphere. And the questions of horizontal flight have not yet been considered. Can you imagine how useful a device with such an engine would be for, say, the Ministry of Emergency Situations? Remember the fire at the Ostankino television tower and the complete helplessness of a helicopter flying around? And by the way, photographs of some UFOs, even by their very appearance, make one think about the presence of a central engine in them, operating according to the principles described above. tin can, and such a machine would be much more useful than a conventional helicopter. Simply irreplaceable. Torque is compensated by the presence of several engines on the same platform. Like in the bottom photo. In my opinion, there are 3 inverted Schauberger engines (such as Repulsine B) working for one central nozzle. And it’s probably more correct to place Repulsin like this:

In the photo UFO Adamsky relies on 3 (or 4?) engines similar to Repulsine B. These engines are attached to the bottom of the "hat" and generate 3 or 4 tornadoes on which the whole structure "dangles". One large and three smaller.

Let us return again to the Schauberger engine as an energy generator. The processes occurring in the Einstein glass are undoubtedly the basis of the engine. Let's try to achieve a stable passage of the process. To do this, spin the water in the tank using a disk on the axis of the electric motor motor. Water after spinning will move along a complex trajectory. (fluid movement is described on the site www.evert.de, a computer drawing from this site is given). Very interesting conclusions can be drawn from this figure. The linear speed of water movement along this ornate path is constant and is determined by the linear speed movement of the edges of the disc. The liquid dispersed by the disk spirals down and is further pushed towards the center. At this point, there is an increase angular velocity water rotation. (A vivid analogue of such an increase in the speed of rotation is the rotation of a thread with a load when winding this thread around a finger). The fluid rises with an increased angular velocity and rests against the central part of the disk. Here is the most interesting. The speed of rotation of water in the central region is higher than the speed of rotation of the disk! The water "pushes" the disk in the direction of rotation. The rotating stream supports itself! Almost like a perpetual motion machine. But as always, friction forces interfere. And the process is quite stable and low-damping. By the way, a little distracted: if you spin water in an ordinary bucket, even without the help of a disk, the water will still rotate according to the same laws and the water will rotate for quite a long time, because here there is self-support of water rotation - just no one ever pays attention to it (it is enough to tightly close the lid of the bucket filled exactly to the brim - the rotation will stop pretty quickly). What do I want to say? Only one thing - a vortex is very easy to obtain when spinning a liquid or gas under unequal conditions of rotation from above and below, and this is an almost ready-made self-supporting system. You need quite a bit of energy and the process will be undamped. Furthermore: the vortex absorbs energy in the form of heat from the environment! Now I will try to explain. Consider a simplified diagram of the Schauberger engine. If we ignore everything secondary, then the design fits into the following simple scheme, which in fact is nothing more than a continuation of the idea glass Einstein a.

Inside at the top - a rotating disk (red). Below is a small vertically standing plate. This achieves uneven conditions during rotation for the lower and upper layers of water (air?). On the left is a heat exchanger (more on that later). Above - a motor-generator, at first it works as a process starter, after entering the tornado mode - to extract energy. The valve on the heat exchanger is a process switch. The arrow on the left is the working body of the device heated by the environment.

What happens during the operation of this device? Everything is simple. Centrifugal forces create increased pressure at the walls of the vessel. And a vacuum in the central part. Due to the higher angular velocity of rotation of the upper layers of water (air) in comparison with the lower ones, a meridional flow is created, descending along the walls of the vessel. And rising in the central part (in nature, this is nothing more than a "tornado trunk"). Liquid (gas), moving along its sophisticated trajectory, then gets into the area of ​​compression, then into the area of ​​rarefaction. Let's remember the simplest law of physics - the Boyle-Mariotte law. If we take a certain mass of gas, then with forced compression, the gas heats up. And when rarefied, it cools. It is in the central part of the device that the water-air mixture enters the region of forced rarefaction by centrifugal forces. In this case, for a finite mass of gas, decrease in temperature and increase in volume. This increase in volume gives an increase in the kinetic movement of the flow from bottom to top along the central axis of the device. This charged jet with new energy enters the turbine disk, causing it to spin faster and produce an even more intense whirlwind. which creates an even higher vacuum, and so on and so forth. The cooled moist air is expelled by centrifugal force into the heat exchanger tube. Ideally, the temperature of the heat exchanger is near absolute zero. The environment surrounding the heat exchanger, which is normal from our point of view, is an "environment with excess energy". The heat exchanger is heated by it and the thermal energy enters the inside of the device, eventually converting into the rotation of a "self-turning donut" from moist air inside the device.

I want to make a small note about the Ranque effect (temperature separation of a gas jet in the so-called "Ranque tubes"). No one really explains this effect. And in my opinion, everything is simple. There is the Boyle-Mariotte law (the product of pressure and volume at a constant temperature is a constant value) and everything happens according to this law. The gas circulating in the meridional direction in our device alternately experiences either compression or rarefaction. It heats up, then cools down in relation to the "normal" temperature. That's the whole effect of temperature separation. By the way, no one tried to inject water there? Should be a very interesting effect. Something like passing the "dew point" with a sharp cooling.

By the way, we can draw an interesting conclusion: but in this device it is also oscillatory process ! And oscillations have a resonance - a sharp increase in amplitude with a minimum input of energy! Can you imagine how it is possible to stabilize the effect when finding here the dependencies between the amplitude of oscillations and all the influencing parameters? temperature resonance! It sounds good. And it can find excellent application in refrigeration machines.

It is my deep conviction that Schauberger was great person and undeservedly unknown. It seems to me that he still managed to build a generator that extracts energy, it seems, from " NOTHING". More precisely, directly from the environment. Even if this is done very inefficiently, the freeness of this energy should outweigh all the arguments against it. What is still surprising? On the Internet, you can find quite a lot of information about the works of Schauberger. But, apparently, so far there is no technological revolution in energy production.It seems that there are photographs and drawings of structures.However, all the descriptions of the operation of the engine that I have met so far are so unintelligibly monotonous (and from my point of view are absolutely incorrect) that it becomes immediately clear - nothing working is simply No. I do not pretend to be the ultimate truth. Everything that is described on my website is a chain of continuous contradictions and inaccuracies. Only I am convinced that the engine is a generator with amazing properties, which generates, or rather concentrates energy from the energy of the environment, is quite possible and can be made right now. The socio-economic consequences of such an invention, of course, will have no conceivable limits. This and complete solution energy problems and changing the concept of vehicles.

Based on the foregoing, it remains only to draw a specific design. Well then. As a hypothetical, "virtual" engine, I propose the following "pan":

Vortex motor-generator

This device can perform the following functions:

1. Energy generator. Rather, a concentrator of energy from the environment. Do not turn your tongue to say "perpetual motion machine of the 2nd kind."

2. Heat engine - the possibilities for cooling and conditioning are especially great. By the way, the working fluid here is not necessarily water-air. It is possible air and freon.

3. Gravitational mechanism. That's a pretty cheeky statement, but I'll try to explain. And in 2 ways.

3.1. The effect of weight loss of rapidly rotating masses is known. Why does it depend? Let's go back to Fig. Everta. It is clear that with such rotation of air, incredible speeds can be achieved (due to a small mass of air). The device is not in danger of destruction, unlike, for example, a metal flywheel. By and large, despite the complexity of the trajectory, each point of this trajectory moves tangentially to the surface of the earth. And it is quite possible to achieve a linear speed of 8 km/sec on this trajectory. artificial satellite with an orbit of 1 meter? Will there be levitation? Hm...

3.2. Once upon a time, I got into the hands of the TM magazine with an article on gravitational mechanisms (inertioids). It described about 10 types of mechanisms and immediately explained. why they can not fully work, that is, fly. True, at the end of the article it was stated that there was still no final verdict on the operation of such devices and the question was open. Therefore, I suggest number 11. At one time, I was very interested in the rotation of a simple flywheel on the axis of an electric motor. I had the motor in my hands. Its power was 70 watts., 7000 rpm at U = 24v, the flywheel was an aluminum disk with a diameter of 10 cm, weighing 200 grams. I explain in detail. so that those who wish can try it for themselves. Unless, of course, it is interesting. When the handwheel is rotated, there is a complete feeling that you are already holding a working inertioid in your hands! It is enough to rotate the design around the hand - and a complete illusion of incomprehensible thrust in a very specific direction. Such an interesting effect is given by rotation around 2 axes simultaneously (the axis of the motor and the axis of the hand). Then an idea appeared which now, in a strange way, intersected with the essence of the Schauberger engine. Previously, it seemed to me frank nonsense, though quite interesting. I'll probably draw a little later.

And now a small conclusion to what is stated on this page. Some general basic principles can be formulated for the operation of devices that produce mechanical energy by "absorbing" energy from the environment:

1. A process is generated that is on the verge of self-support (for example, in hydraulics, a closed vortex like an Einstein glass is an extremely unstable and rather inertial state: examples are very often - a spinning funnel of water, air, a natural tornado; in electrical engineering, an electric motor and a dynamo connected on the same axis ). For real self-support, it is necessary to add external energy to such a system. Sometimes very small, compensating for friction or resistance losses.

2. Hyperbolizing process. Up to the resonance that occurs in such a device (in a vortex - heating and cooling of a water-air mixture, in electrical engineering, the induction of electromagnetic fields is obvious) ..

3. "Inversion" of the structure in relation to the environment in such a way that some part of this structure will have energy with a sharply reduced energy potential and become an energy absorber of the environment (for example, in hydraulics - the central part of the Schauberger engine - ideally this space is approximate to absolute zero in temperature and pressure, therefore, the ordinary medium surrounding this part of the engine has an "excess" of energy. In electrical engineering - it's more difficult here - the overlap and resonance of fields is obvious, I'll leave the idea unfinished for now).

4. The release of energy "absorbed" from the outside from the closed space of the device in the form mechanical energy or electric.

Vivid examples such devices:

Schauberger engine and very similar Clem engine

In electrical engineering, the Tesla generator and the Searl generator.

Now we can assume what was inside Schauberger's Repulsine. Most likely it was a design similar to the illustration below. The vortex formed in the central part absorbs with the help of a heat exchanger (essentially a conventional centrifugal pump) that minimum heat from the air passing through the turbine blades, which is necessary to maintain rotation. The engine starts when the turbine spins up and a small amount of water is injected from below. Probably, after entering the tornado mode, water is no longer needed and only air is the working fluid. The pressure inside the engine during operation is lowered in the center, increased at the periphery. The Rank effect "works" to the full extent. Rather, it should work even more pronounced than in the "Ranque tubes" (this is because the air swirling in the Ranque tubes is thrown out instantly and rather wastefully, and here this effect "accumulates" during cyclic meridional rotation). Cooled from below, the heat exchanger-turbine is heated from above by the injected ambient air. The rejection of this cooled air creates the usual jet thrust.

In short, if it really works (I suppose if the Schauberger engine really existed, then it was something like this design) - we can consider it an absolutely universal engine-propulsion-generator. Super-ecological and fuel-free. With a stream of cold air as an exhaust.

Vortex motor-generator-propulsion

The design in terms of manufacturability is at the level of the beginning of the last century, maybe even earlier. Looks like a regular vacuum cleaner. Its simplicity makes you wonder - does it work? But I don't see much of a contradiction. I think this picture can get significant distribution on the Internet. At least as a discussion.

An industrial power generation plant might look something like this:

Vortex Power Plant Block (energy cell?)

The design is extremely simple. Who said that the "trunk of a tornado" should be directed downwards? Let's turn everything upside down (by the way, in Schauberger's pencil sketch at the top of the page is also questionable - where is "top and bottom"). In this way, the generation of an artificial vortex is greatly simplified. What is needed to form a vortex? The answer is - some ambient heat, moisture, and initial swirling of a mass of moist air. Ordinary water is poured into a bowl-shaped container. At the initial stage, the motor-generator, with the help of a turbine with spiral blades, begins to twist the water-air cone, and after the structure has entered the tornado mode, absorption of heat from the surrounding air , acceleration of the movement of rarefied air along the center of the vortex and the pressure of this flow on the turbine blades. The motor-generator can be switched to the energy harvesting mode. I leave the description of the operation of the installation as minimal - the picture is extremely clear. Although the processes occurring in this device are much more complex and diverse (I deliberately omitted the formation of a minitornado when the main vortex occurs, as well as possible electrostatic effects). In this picture, I was just trying to highlight the main thing - vortex self-support process is possible and in my opinion is quite simple. I don’t know what height the resulting vortex will have (it’s quite possible - this installation can become the “rotor” of a full-scale natural tornado in an open area). And if in nature the process of vortex formation occurs all the time, and sometimes it seems to be for no reason at all, then I propose to treat this device as a set of glands and other details that contribute to the "civilized" emergence of a very common natural phenomenon.

A separate question about the dimensions of this design. Criticism on the Internet does not like a different image when someone starts talking about the significant size of the proposed structures. Therefore, I will not talk about gigantic dimensions (such a negative example is the Messiah machine with a diameter of 50 meters). Much more I like the description of the Schauberger Home Machine Power - the dimensions of this device are about 1 meter in diameter. By the way, what I propose is a kind of symbiosis between these two devices. Only structurally simpler and perhaps better. And the minimum dimensions are nevertheless determined by the laws of nature - I have never seen an air vortex in wildlife less than a meter (a simple example is the usual turbulences on a dusty road). But if you imagine the maximum dimensions of such a station! The imagination can easily draw a huge installation in an open area, which will provoke the emergence of a real tornado in all its crushing power. Only this tornado is "tamed", therefore it always stands in one place - exactly above the power plant. And if you build a complex of large-scale vortex power plants that cool the surrounding space? Here we can already talk about the impact on the climate! It would be a wonderful contribution to the fight against global warming. Here is a little fantasy on the subject:

These structures, it seems to me, can be made within very wide limits in terms of size and power, but the most obvious is as a small-sized autonomous source of energy (for example, for a detached house). Remember how personal computers "filled up" at one time "large computers"? We need to be closer to the consumer!

Everything certainly looks pretty fantastic, but still I want to enhance the impression. And finally figure out what is implosion, which Schauberger constantly talked about and try to understand - what did he want to offer?

Let's start with the fact that the entire technogenic civilization currently depends on Explosions. From Latin it is an explosion, an exhaust. The work of any modern heat engine (left side of the figure) is the combustion of fuel in some volume, a sharp increase in temperature and expansion of the working fluid as a result of this combustion. The working fluid increased in volume presses on the piston, the turbine, it is simply discarded to obtain a reactive impulse. Almost any engine runs on the expansion process as a result of fuel combustion, constantly wasting non-renewable resources in the form of gas-oil-coal-uranium. I don’t even want to talk about the waste of such technology - you can imagine. But after all, the expansion of the working body can be obtained as a result of a completely different process! An example is a natural tornado. I'll try to explain a little. Let's imagine. that in some container they began to rotate the working fluid. In the simplest case, this is ordinary air, as in this figure on the right (a miniature model of a natural tornado). In the central part, an accelerating upward trend will immediately appear. forward movement. There are at least 3 reasons for this:

1. At the expense underpressure by centrifugal force the central part of the vortex some an increase in volume for a finite mass of gas and a decrease in its temperature. From the sides, this mass is "supported" by the walls of the vessel, from below its bottom. There is only one way to expand - up.

2. On rarefied part of the gas in the central part Archimedes' law applies- a lighter body "floats" - something like hot air balloon, only without the shell.

3. The third reason is the most exotic. When air rotates, it acquires a significant electric potential. Positive in the center, negative in the periphery. Despite its simplicity, this tornado model (and the tornado itself in the original) is an excellent electrostatic generator (the theory of the emergence of such an electric potential is best reflected in the materials on the Searl generator). In a real tornado, a magnitude of millions of volts is reached and manifests itself in the constant occurrence of lightning in the "eye of the tornado" and its "trunk". Thus, in the body of a tornado, in the presence of such a high voltage, the air becomes electrified. BUT charges of the same name as is known repel! (positively charged air molecules - devoid of electrons, repel each other). This way it happens increase in gas pressure due to electrostatic forces!. And this extension again gives an additional impetus to the upward movement of air. I wonder if such an effect is formulated in physics - an increase in the volume of gas when it is electrified? If not, why are you not discovering? Rummaging around the Internet, I didn’t find anything like that, but the effect should clearly be. I want to explain everything that has been said with this cartoon and try to prove that tornado is an electrostatic machine, and structurally the simplest. On the Internet, you can find enough designs where the rotor is a simple dielectric cylinder, on the sides of which a high voltage of several tens of kilovolts is simply applied. An avalanche of charged particles flowing between the electrodes simply turns the rotor cylinder.

With this cartoon (a section of a tornado), I would like to summarize what the authors of such structures offer and offer their answer to the question - why does the tornado actually rotate?

electrostatic

tornado model

Consider a cross section of a tornado. We will see something like a ball bearing. Research

If you want to receive news on Facebook, click "like" ×

//= \app\modules\Comment\Service::render(\app\modules\Comment\Model::TYPE_ARTICLE, $item["id"]); ?>

To date, there are more than 5 million UFO sightings, and thousands of pages of previously secret documents have been declassified confirming the reality of this phenomenon. But despite the fact that UFOs quite often visit our planet, most of the aspects associated with them remain a mystery to people. The situation is complicated by the fact that official science continues to ignore this problem and does not want to notice seemingly obvious things.

But it is not at all necessary to accuse official science of being biased. If you analyze the situation from all sides, it becomes obvious that the roots of the problem go very deep and high. UFOs are very closely connected with the military and scientific and technological policies of leading states - this is eloquently evidenced by documents declassified in the United States under the Law "On Freedom of Information" of such government services as the CIA, FBI, National Security Agency (NSA), the Intelligence Agency of the Ministry of Defense, NASA , NORAD (North American Joint Air Defense System). The facts indicate that the secret services know very well and in detail what a UFO is. And they not only know, but also try to create the same technology. And the silence of official science seems to have been created artificially so as not to attract public attention to this topic: it’s easier to spend secret research.

In addition to officially declassified documents, most of them continue to gather dust in top-secret government archives. Not all documents related to UFOs are subject to the Freedom of Information Act. The Act has a special exception for documents whose disclosure could harm national security, and US agencies actively use this clause to lawsuits with ufologists. This once again confirms the direct connection of UFOs with the policies of individual states and global politics. And the fact that people associate ufology with "little green men" and madhouses - most likely, this is also artificially created in order to divert people's attention from the problem, which is taken more than seriously by military and government officials, more precisely, by those who are aware in this area.

Obviously, the documents that remain classified contain the most valuable information about UFOs and their inhabitants. One of the documents applying for this role is proposed in this article. The document was obtained by renowned American ufologist Leonard Stringfield from a source he never met. The intermediary who passed on the document, whom Stringfield knows well, chose to remain anonymous for fear of government reprisals. The document dated July 16, 1947 is a preliminary report on the results of the inspection of the crashed "flying disk". The accompanying letter to the report was signed by the commander of the US Air Force in 1947, General Nathan Twining.

"Preliminary" report on UFO incidents in 1947

As stated in the Presidential Directive of July 9, 1947, a preliminary examination of the recovered "flying disc" and the wreckage of a possible second disc was conducted at Army Headquarters [Eighth Air Force Headquarters at Fort Worth, Texas. - approx. author]. The information for this report was provided by the staff technical staff of the 2nd technical department and the aviation laboratory of the 3rd technical department. Additional data is provided by the scientific staff of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Air Force Scientific Advisory Department, led by Dr. Theodor von Karman.

Further analysis was carried out by the Science and Development Division.

Regarding the object under study, there is a collective opinion that the aircraft, picked up by parts of the army and air force, does not belong to American production for the following reasons:

The device and design of the UFO

1. The round, disc-shaped "platform" design is unlike any of the designs currently being developed by any project.

2. The absence of any external propulsion system, power plant, ventilation and exhaust ducts, as well as propellers or a jet engine, confirms this opinion.

3. German scientists from Fort Bliss and White Sands Proving Grounds [ secret objects US army. - approx. author] cannot identify secret German weapons in these objects. True, the possibility remains that such a device was developed by the Russians. The absence of any markings, identification numbers or instructions in Cyrillic caused serious doubts among the majority that these objects were Russian-made.

Examination of the interior of the apparatus revealed the presence of a compartment similar to an atomic engine. At least, this is the opinion expressed by Dr. Oppenheimer and Dr. von Karman. There is a possibility that a part of the apparatus itself constitutes a propulsion system that assigns the function of a heat exchanger to the reactor and plays the role of an energy storage device. This process is not like the release of energy in our atomic bombs.

UFO power room device

1. A donut-shaped tube, approximately thirty-five feet, made of plastic-like material, surrounds the central core. The tube turned out to be filled with a purified substance, possibly heavy water. The massive rod at the center of the tube is immersed in a coil of copper-like material that runs through the body of the tube. This may be a reactor control mechanism or a storage battery. No moving parts were found in the studied areas.

2. The activation of the electric potential appears to be the primary energy for the reactor, although, at present, this is only an assumption. What remains unknown is how a heavy water reactor functions in such an environment.

3. Under the power plant, a spherical turret, approximately 10 feet in diameter, was found. This turret is equipped with a number of devices with unusual characteristics unknown to any of our engineers. Inside the turret are four circular cavities covered with an unknown smooth material. These cavities are symmetrical to each other, but appear to be mobile. True, it is not known how. This movement is associated with a domed room above the power plant. It is believed that the main propulsion system is a bladeless turbine, similar to the current developments under the project "Magnat". Dr. August Steinhoff (Head of Research), Dr. Werner von Braun and Dr. Theodor von Karman put forward the following theory: flying through the atmosphere, the aircraft somehow absorbs hydrogen and in the process of induction generates an atomic fusion reaction. For the apparatus to move, the air around it must be ionized. Linked to the surrounding "air foil", the aircraft can supposedly have an unlimited range and flight speed. This may explain the reported absence of any noise.

Living compartment device

The living compartment of the UFO is located in the upper part. It is round with a domed top. The absence of a canopy, observation windows, portholes or any other optical projections confirms the opinion that the device is controlled remotely.

1) Semicircular screen (possibly television).

2) The living quarters were sealed with a special hardening compound.

3) There are no traces of welding, riveting or soldering.

4) The components of the apparatus are of impeccable shape and quality

In conclusion, it remains to be noted that a rather detailed description of the internal structure of the "flying saucer" and the principle of operation of the aircraft is of particular interest in this document. If the document is authentic, then the information contained in it can be a significant contribution to ufology and to the formation of knowledge about the technical aspects of UFOs.