Peter the Great). North-Western State Medical University named after N.N. I. Mechnikova (Hospital named after Peter the Great) Hospital of Mechnikov Piskarevsky 47 paid

Clinical Hospital at the North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov consists of several divisions located in various districts of St. Petersburg. Their total bed capacity is 1,380 beds. They annually provide medical care to more than 40,000 inpatients and more than 400,000 outpatients. These units are on a par with the best federal healthcare institutions in terms of the use of high-tech methods of treatment, the complexity of the tasks being solved, the capacity of the beds, the qualifications of specialists and the level of equipment. Modern computer and digital magnetic resonance tomographs with a high degree resolutions, x-ray and angiography units, expert-class ultrasound units, heart rate mapping systems, digital automated laboratory analyzers provide high quality provided medical services. Having throughput up to 1000 samples per day, the department of clinical molecular morphology allows for high-precision studies in the field of intravital morphodiagnostics and immunohistochemistry. Based on the research data, the hospital specialists will consult or prescribe a course of treatment.

    • Quality of treatment 1
    • The attitude of the medical staff 1
    • Equipping with medical equipment 1
    • Price-quality ratio 1
    • Comfort and cleanliness 1

    In October 2018, my wife, 59 years old, came to the MAPO clinic on Kirochnaya Street for open heart surgery. She was a person full of strength and energy, she worked, drove a car, swam in the pool. There were no significant clinical manifestations of the heart. What happened next is simply impossible for any sane person to understand. I believe that doctors, if they can be called that, have committed ***** Let me explain.

    Mitral valve plasty was performed by cardiac surgeon Kuznetsov together with M. Dewar (USA). It was carried out according to the quota and was planned. During the operation or immediately after it, severe complications arose in the form of multiple organ failure and rhabdomyolysis - a disease in which all the muscles of the body “burn out”. Kuznetsov assured me and my relatives that the operation went well.

    What's the matter? The curator and chief “ideologist” of the treatment, Lebedinsky, and the head of the intensive care unit, Vanyushkin, begin to explain these complications by a genetic factor and an autoimmune response of the body. and without any evidence; saying, at the same time, that they themselves do not understand this (these are people who consider themselves professionals). By the way, after the death of the patient, a genetic analysis ordered by the already named persons came. It turned out to be absolutely normal, although I understand that only one of the possible options was proposed, if it is appropriate, in general, to talk about genetics here. It is most likely impossible to confirm or refute this factor at this level of knowledge. But it is clear that anything can be covered up with this "screen": equipment malfunction, blatant lack of professionalism of the staff, negligence, etc. paternal uncle died at 96, the other is now 91. This is a matter of genetics. And why should my family and I believe this? To remove responsibility from the staff?

    But, even if we assume that yes, genetics is "to blame", mutations of some genes have occurred, then all further treatment is nothing but a mockery of the patient, common sense and it is simply impossible to call logic. During the one and a half months that she lay in the ward, her body was swollen and yellowed, she was unable to move her arms, legs, or head, her temperature, except for 2-3 days, was 38-39 degrees and above, hospital-acquired pneumonia circulating in the ward was leaking all the time. Although the doctors claimed she was conscious, this was an outright lie. Our repeated visits did not confirm this, she did not react to us in any way. If there was any consciousness, it was very, very confused, which most likely means a violation of the oxygen regime either during the operation or immediately after it. The patient's condition, again with the exception of 2-3 days, was constantly deteriorating, no restoration of organs (in particular, kidneys and lungs), which the doctors promised, did not occur. To my repeated demands to remove the fever and to give, at the suggestion of the same Lebedinsky and Vanyushkin, penta-globulin, it was said that a consultation should be held. But it was already too late. My wife is gone. When asked why they did not give this drug, Vanyushkin replied: "It is expensive." And this despite the fact that all the standards and regulations for the treatment of pneumonia are prescribed by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, all this should have been known to this staff. This is their direct responsibility. In the end, if you yourself do not understand, contact other specialists, on which I insisted. After all we are talking about human life! What, in St. Petersburg there are no such specialists who understand this better than you and your clinical pharmacologists? But no. Pride, and simply banal “indifference” did not allow this.

    That's why I call everything that happened deliberate ****. I think there is no other way to call it. I believe that the death of the patient is solely on the conscience of all these persons: Kuznetsov, Lebedinsky and Vanyushkin.

    Blatant non-professionalism, snobbery based on nothing (our opinion and our treatment are the most correct), mutual responsibility (if today you will pass me, then tomorrow I will betray you), servility (“this one is a professor, and I am an assistant professor”) , lies, demagoguery and impunity - that's far from full list what I observed and reigns in this clinic and this ward. All this "treatment" was like the action of an elephant in a china shop.

    No independent experts were allowed into the Chamber. In particular, in response to my requests to bring for consultation the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences from the First Med. institute, I heard from Lebedinsky: "He is a dishonorable person. If he comes, he will say that everything was wrong from the very beginning (which, obviously, it was, judging by the result). And then I wash my hands and take off any responsibility." These are the words of a man who took the Hippocratic Oath. And what kind of responsibility did he bear? At least moral? No. How can this, and everything described above, be treated? These people, in addition to teaching students, can be called doctors? Can they continue in this profession, make a career? Nothing but contempt, these people, in my opinion, can not cause.

    Yes, formally, the patient did a lot of work, fussed, seemed to pay attention to her (again, according to the staff), telephone conversations were constantly held with the doctors - no one denies this. But all this fuss only led to her death.

    It should also be said that this is far from the only case of such "treatment" in this ward over the past year and a half. I already know about at least one criminal case initiated on the crime of its employees, quite similar to this one, I also know about a case very close to this one and exactly with this staff, when the indignation of the relatives of the deceased knew no bounds. That is, there is a system of treatment inherent in this clinic. If these people treated someone, then, apparently, already in those situations when it was simply impossible not to do this.

    I want to warn those who are going to be treated in it: you are in mortal danger. Pass it on to all your relatives and friends, tell it on social networks. Otherwise, all the outrages happening in this clinic will continue.

    • Quality of treatment 5
    • The attitude of the medical staff 5
    • Efficiency of receiving medical assistance 5
    • Equipping with medical equipment 5
    • Price-quality ratio 5
    • Comfort and cleanliness 5

    In March of this year, our mother was admitted to the Botkin Hospital on Piskarevsky
    pr. 49.
    They put me on an ambulance for compulsory medical insurance. Diagnosis of SARS with suspected pneumonia.
    After all the horror stories that you usually hear about the Botkin hospital, we were pleasantly surprised that everything is completely different.
    Great modern hospital.
    Double room with shower and toilet.
    We would like to express our deep gratitude to all the staff of the 8th department, and especially to our doctor Olga Vladimirovna. He is a caring and considerate person. All nurses and nurses are friendly and always ready to help an elderly person.

    • Quality of treatment 1
    • The attitude of the medical staff 1
    • Efficiency of receiving medical assistance 4
    • Equipping with medical equipment 3
    • Price-quality ratio 1
    • Comfort and cleanliness 3

    Hello! I am writing to warn everyone against getting into this HORRIBLE hospital, in which they made it so that in the end my dear grandmother died! Let me explain why this is so! On November 14, 2016, the granny was brought to this ill-fated hospital with a massive heart attack (within the first 1.5-2 hours after the attack). They put me in the intensive care unit of the 16th cardiological department. There, the doctor said that it is necessary to do caronarography, without explaining the contraindications! He said there was no risk. We thought, but agreed, and after a few days it turned out that this procedure has many specific contraindications that my grandmother has (DOCTORS KNEW ALL THIS). For two days, my grandmother was in intensive care ... the condition was called stably severe. On the 3rd day (Wednesday), she was transferred to the cardiology department and NOBODY called her relatives, although all the phones were. The person needed care, and they simply threw her on the bed in the ward and left. All we had to do was call in advance and we would come, then we would hire a 24-hour nurse if necessary. But the doctors thought differently ... the result: the strongest fall of the grandmother when trying to get out of bed without supervision, which the doctors and nurses kept silent about. We learned about this fact from patients. On that day, my mother called the intensive care unit, and they said that my grandmother had already been at the department for several hours. Mom arrived and saw that her condition had deteriorated sharply, in comparison with admission to the hospital. Grandmother's speech was severely impaired, she did not move well and there were obvious brain disorders stroke-like. However, no one diagnosed a stroke and did not even check the head, judging by the extract. Then the next day, the granny was again transferred to intensive care, ALLEGEDLY only for the weekend due to the fact that there were not enough people in the department and they would not be able to take care (the doctors knew about the possibility of having a nurse). But in the intensive care unit already in the therapeutic department, with an extensive heart attack complicated by diabetes mellitus. On Monday, no one transferred my grandmother to the department, and they kept her in intensive care, where they let her in only 1 time. The condition was always assessed as stably serious ... they didn’t say anything special. And now, in intensive care, instead of several days (the transfer was promised on Thursday and until Monday), she lay there for 7 days and then they told us that they say take it away ... we write it out. We were in shock, not understanding, because every day there is only one answer about the state of "stably serious". With difficulty, my mother persuaded the intensive care doctor to treat my grandmother for a couple more days. As a result, judging by the extract, no one treated for a couple of days ... they just held it. As it turned out, the head of cardiology has such a practice: to throw off patients in serious condition from their department, supposedly for the weekend, to a non-core therapeutic intensive care unit! And then don't take it back. This doctor from cardiology said so: no one will take her to the department, no one will take care and treat her ... there are no places (they say if you want, then we will leave her in the corridor on the bed). As a result, a person in serious condition is discharged from intensive care IMMEDIATELY HOME. The condition after their treatment was only worse, most likely the grandmother was not even fed there and it is not known how she was treated. They kept me in the hospital for only 12 days, and then the last couple of days only thanks to the head of resuscitation therapy. Discharged home in a terrible state, and in the extract they wrote (attention!), The state is "satisfactory" (you would have such a satisfactory doctor or your family) and is discharged to the clinic. By the way, the extract does not say that the person almost all the time was not in cardiology, but in therapy. In the discharge and analyzes, everything is good, and the ECG is also supposedly normal in dynamics. But in fact, a person who walked to the hospital on his own feet, had a good idea for 86 years, came home nothing (lying and sleeping, with impaired speech and almost without strength). The next day we call an ambulance, because we realized that everything in the statement is a lie. The ambulance doctors determine atrial fibrillation on the ECG, blood sugar is 26 (although everything was supposedly okay in the hospital), low hemoglobin = 70 (although everything is perfect according to the tests in the extract). They are already hospitalized in another hospital, where the doctor directly says that the condition is serious and even deplorable (despite the fact that in the cardiology of Peter the Great it is considered satisfactory)! They fought for 2 weeks in that hospital ... after my grandmother passed away. I believe that the fault is to a large extent on the hospital of Peter the Great, especially on the head of the 16th cardiology department. SHE acted inhumanly and cruelly, as a result, this led to the death of a person dear to us.

    • Quality of treatment 5
    • The attitude of the medical staff 5
    • Efficiency of receiving medical assistance 5
    • Equipping with medical equipment 5
    • Price-quality ratio 5
    • Comfort and cleanliness 5

    I thank all the staff of the gynecological department of the St. Petersburg Mechnikov Hospital (Peter the Great Clinic) for their friendly attitude and effective treatment. The order established in the department is maximally adapted for the comfort of patients, down to such details as a pack of washing powder in the toilet, on the table near the buffet there are teapots with boiled water, boiling water and tea leaves.
    The department is very clean. I saw, they wrote on the Internet that you can’t go to the toilet, there’s nowhere to step, dirt. Unfortunately, not everyone is accustomed to clean up after themselves, some leave terrible dirt, although there are mops with a floor cloth in the toilets and in the shower, there is a washing tank, and it is not difficult to clean up after yourself.
    about the quality of treatment. The doctors are very attentive, aware of how each of their patients is doing, and when they meet in the hallway, they can ask a specific question about the signs of recovery or answer any specific question without holding a medical history in their hands. They really keep in mind the treatment of each ward. At the same time, recovery occurs quickly, enhanced if necessary by additional procedures. Helps recovery and physiotherapy. I had two attending physicians - Konstantin Sergeevich Churkin, who introduced himself to me immediately after the examination as a professor-surgeon, and Yulia Evgenievna Gavrish, to whom he passed on my treatment and introduced us to each other. And after the "transfer" for some time he was interested in how I was doing. Both are very competent and attentive, as I can judge by the answers to my questions and advice on how best to proceed. The operation was performed by Professor Dina Fyodorovna Kostyuchek, a most pleasant, optimistic and encouraging woman with her communication.
    Most communication occurs with nurses. They solve many issues that may arise unexpectedly, skillfully perform their work. For example, they do excellent injections, they take blood from a vein much more deftly than usual in clinics. Exceptionally friendly, they always willingly respond to requests, even if they had to turn late at night.
    Nurse Lyudmila Vasilievna accompanies the operation. The day before, she comes and tells what you need to take with you, how to prepare. The fact that a familiar person takes her to the operation, and is not driven on a stretcher, wrapped in a sheet, has a calming effect. She accompanies to the very operating table and lays on it. Then comes the anesthesiologist. The anesthesia was good, from which it was easy to get out - there was only drowsiness. I did not have time to find out the name of the anesthesiologist - she switched off .
    The food in the hospital is hearty and tasty - roast, cottage cheese casserole, chicken casserole and other main courses, delicious soups, delicious cereals. I would like to repeat the same dishes at home. Two friendly women are handing out food, so kind and generous that I was worried that I might gain weight. They are happy to deliver food to the wards, they make sure that no one misses and does not go hungry, and they are happy when the dishes offered are liked. (The hospital food department's guest book is full of thanks.)
    Do not think that I am writing this review to order. I just checked out and am happy with the results. I saw such terrible reviews on the Internet that at first I was even afraid to go to this hospital. But one woman on the selection committee said that she had already been there and the second time only again there. This convinced me, and now I also say the same thing a lot - if something happens, then to the Mechnikov hospital. Therefore, I am writing a review and my opinion for the sake of objectivity.
    I also saw on the Internet complaints about admission to the ambulance. One night there were a lot of doctors, interns, graduates of the medical academy in the hospital - at least a day, if not more. Many new patients appeared, all of them did not take revenge in the wards, they lay in the corridor. The medical staff walked around them all night, until the morning, put droppers, questioned them, treated them. It is hard to imagine that with such activity, someone was not helped.
    I am grateful to all the staff of the gynecological department, headed by the head Victoria Anatolyevna Pechenikova, who more than once examined every patient in her department, and was no less aware of the treatment than the attending physicians. She created a friendly atmosphere. In the mornings, the sick and the medical staff who came to work greeted each other. Thank you for your kind and caring attitude!
    Didn't like it: from household - one shower and toilet per compartment. From the rest - a clear feeling that I got on the conveyor, the examination is organized as follows: they gather the entire crowd near the examination room, then they call them to the examination room according to the list, where there are 2 chairs and you are respectively treated in the direct presence of another patient. But this is not the most interesting - in order to get into the observation room, you have to undress, and right in the corridor, where everyone walks and is not too lazy, including visitors. Just in case, they put a small screen at the door, but you still feel like in a shop window. The only desire that arose after such an examination was to escape from there. There should be at least an elementary respect for patients, but the attitude is like meat.
    In terms of the quality of treatment: no appointments were made at discharge - they said to go to the LC and let them be treated there, although in the absence of proper postoperative treatment there will be a relapse (which happened to me after Dynamo). After another follow-up ultrasound, the doctor found that one of the ovaries was too close to the uterus, suggested that this was an adhesion that arose during hysteroscopy treatment. It is possible that this arose after GB No. 31, but the sonographers did not tell me about this before ...
    If I had to choose between City Hospital No. 31 and Mechnikov, I would definitely choose Mechnikov, because their main shortcomings in domestic conditions. But if I have another choice, I would prefer another clinic.
    She was treated according to VMI, they took her for surgery as soon as the cycle allowed. I don’t know how much it costs, the insurance paid, so in the assessment I put 5 from the bulldozer.
    The doctor - I don’t remember exactly the last name, young, the last name is similar to Churin or something like that.
    I will write a complaint through the website of the Ministry of Health - let them do something with the organization of patient care, because this is not just disrespect, but also a violation of the law on medical confidentiality.

(7)

If you are an official representative of the clinic and want to be able to comment on reviews of your clinic, leave a request, we will contact you and tell you how to do it

03.05.19 11:56:36

-2.0 Terrible

Good afternoon! I am writing this review to warn everyone against going to this hospital. And in order to tell doctors the wishes they deserve. On December 12, 2018, my mother became ill at home. They called an ambulance. The ambulance doctor examined her and said that there was water in her lungs. “There is nothing terrible yet, but you need to go to the hospital.” By ambulance I brought my mother to this “hospital” (named after Peter the Great, SBEI HPE “North-Western State medical University named after I.I. Mechnikova, Piskarevsky Ave., 47) with heart disease. At the admission department, she immediately provided extracts from two hospitals (cardiology departments) in which my mother had previously been treated. She moved on her own. In the emergency department, having made an x-ray, they said that there was water in the lungs. They put her in a non-core resuscitation and intensive care unit of a therapeutic profile No. 2 (building 24, 3rd floor). The resuscitator was informed about all chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin-dependent. The resuscitator asked to give all the medicines (pills) of the patient that she took, insulin, plates with a device for determining blood glucose and the next day to bring more insulin with plates, as blood glucose control would be required. Naturally, the next day she brought 2 boxes of records and insulin pens. And then the nightmare began. Within 5 days, the same answer: "The condition is stably grave." Doctors-resuscitators do not come out and do not talk at all. Not only we were standing under the doors of the intensive care unit, and not for one hour. Although there is an announcement: "The time of the conversation with the resuscitator is from 14:00 to 15:00." In the corridor it was possible to talk with the attending physician (of a strange appearance and complete lethargy). According to the attending physician, the condition is serious, water in the lungs (pneumonia, but they cannot understand whether it is cardiac or infectious), they are being treated with antibiotics, connected to an artificial lung ventilation (ALV). They are not allowed into the emergency room. On the 4th day (Saturday) I ended up in intensive care. No droppers, no ventilator was connected. Oxygen mask, barely breathing, swelling on the legs. Promise on Monday to hold a consultation of doctors and transfer to cardiology. I would like to ask the doctors: "What did you do for 3 days?" On Sunday they said - come on Monday at 14:00. On Monday I arrived at the hospital at 10:00. The nurse reports that mom was transferred at night to another hospital with a stroke! Then the resuscitator deigned to leave and said that from 12/16/2018 to 12/17/2018 (at night) my mother was transferred (transported) with a stroke, with all things to another hospital, to a neurological intensive care unit in serious condition and with poor symptoms. The ventilator (lung ventilator) was turned off for her, because (I quote): “The patient was against it and snorted.” To my question: “Why didn’t they tell me, didn’t call me? And on what basis were they transported in a serious condition without the permission (consent) of relatives? The resuscitator brazenly and boorishly replied that he had no time. Until 10:00 am on December 17, 2018 - there is no time. But to collect all her things found time. They immediately returned to me all the medicines (pills), insulin, which I gave when my mother was admitted to their intensive care unit. After checking all 3 insulin pens, I found that not a single injection was given! Arriving at another hospital, the doctor said that the patient was admitted in a severe (unconscious) condition, namely: bilateral pneumonia (pneumonia), thrombosis, ischemic stroke “not in the first hours”, “time is lost”. The right side is paralyzed. When I saw my mother in intensive care, I was shocked. Coming with his feet 5 days ago to the hospital. Mechnikov, we could not even think that we would see this. Returning on the same day, 12/17/2018, to the hospital. Peter the Great SBEE HPE "North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov, pr. Piskarevsky, 47; I turned to the head of the department Ruslyakova Irina Anatolyevna for clarification. To the question: “What did you do for 5 days? Why bilateral pneumonia, stroke? The head of the department Ruslyakova Irina Anatolyevna answered with a smile: “So she did with pneumonia. They were treated with antibiotics." To my question: “Why were they transferred (transported) without notification, without the permission (consent) of relatives? Which of the resuscitators was on the shift? the answer of the head of the department Ruslyakova Irina Anatolyevna: "There was no time." As for the doctor on shift, the answer was silence. From the second time, they reluctantly answered me that Gulay Vitaly Leonidovich. For two days, doctors from another hospital fought for my mother's life, but her heart could not stand it anymore. On December 19, 2018, my mother died, she was only 67 years old. I believe that the so-called doctors of the hospital. Mechnikov did not take any action to alleviate the condition of my mother, diagnose and treat, and even transferred in a serious condition to another hospital. They just threw it away, threw it away ... *** I ask everyone who read this review - take care of your loved ones, do not end up in this hospital, especially in this department (reanimation). ***

Read also: