5. Frankish kingdom in the early Middle Ages (VI–VIII centuries)

In 486, as a result of the Frankish conquest, the Frankish state arose in Northern Gaul, headed by the leader of the Salic Franks, Clovis from the Merovian clan (hence the Merovingian dynasty). Thus began the first period of the Frankish state - from the end of the 5th to the end of the 7th centuries, usually called the Merovingian period. Under Holdwig, Aquitaine was conquered, under his successors, Burgundy, and the Ostrogoths ceded Provence to the Franks. By the middle of the 6th century. The Frankish state included almost its territory of the former Roman province of Gaul. The Franks also subjugated a number of Germanic tribes living beyond the Rhine: the supreme power of the Franks was recognized by the Thuringians, Almantians and Bavarians; the Sakas were forced to pay them an annual tribute.

The process of feudalization of the Frankish state took place in the form of a synthesis of decaying late Roman and German tribal relations. At the first stage of the existence of the Frankish state (late 5th - late 7th centuries) in the north of Gaul, late Roman and barbarian structures existed in the form of various structures: decaying slaveholding and barbarian, tribal, as well as the emerging feudal (colonate, various forms of land dependence, friendly relations among francs), to whom the future belonged.

The most important source for studying the social structure of the Franks in the Merovingian period is the Salic Truth. It is a record of the judicial customs of the Salic Franks, believed to have been produced at the beginning of the 6th century, under Clovis. The Roman influence was felt here much less than in other barbarian truths, and is found mainly in external features: the Latin language, fines in Roman monetary units. “Salic truth” reflects the archaic orders of the primitive communal system that existed among the Franks even before the conquest, and weakly reflects the life and legal status of the Gallo-Roman population. According to this document, during this period the Franks had fully developed private, freely alienable ownership of movable property. The main land fund of each village belongs to the collective of its inhabitants - free small landowners who made up the community. The right to freely dispose of inherited plots belonged only to the entire community collective. Individual family ownership of land among the Franks at the end of the 5th and 6th centuries. was just emerging. This is evidenced by the chapter “On Allods”, according to which land inheritance, unlike movable property, was inherited only through the male line. At the end of the 6th century. Under the influence of property stratification and the weakening of clan ties, this chapter was changed in the edict of King Chilperic: it was established that in the absence of a son, the land could be inherited by the daughter, brother or sister of the deceased, and not by the “neighbors,” i.e., by the community. The land became an object of purchase and sale and became the property of the community member. This change was fundamental in nature and led to a further deepening of property and social differentiation in the community, to its decomposition. The emergence of the allod stimulated the growth of large landownership among the Franks. Even during the conquest, Clovis appropriated the lands of the former imperial fiscus. His successors gradually seized all the free lands, which at first were considered the property of their people. From this fund, the Frankish kings distributed land grants in full ownership to their associates and the church. Oppression by large secular landowners, church institutions and royal officials forced the free Franks to submit to the protection of secular and spiritual landowners, who became their lords. The act of entering under personal protection was called “commendation.” Simultaneously with the feudalization of Frankish society, the process of the emergence of the early feudal state took place. The king concentrated in his hands all the functions of government, the center of which became the royal court. He managed the state as a personal farm, which came to him in the form of taxes, fines and trade duties. Royal power relied on the support of the emerging class of large landowners. At one time, Clovis and his retinue, and after him all the Franks, adopted Christianity, which not only increased the king’s authority among the Christian population of Gaul, but also ensured an alliance with the church for him and his successors. The adoption of Christianity was accompanied by the introduction of Latin writing. In almost every village a temple was erected, where a priest led the service. Church ministers represented a special layer of society - the clergy. After the death of Clovis, who divided his kingdom between his 4 sons and who lost part of their income due to the generous distribution of land, the Frankish kings were powerless in the fight against the separatist aspirations of large landowners. The fragmentation of the Frankish state began. All regions were weakly interconnected economically, which prevented their unification in one state. The kings of the Merovingian house fought among themselves for supremacy, and at the end of the 7th century. actual power in all areas of the kingdom was in the hands of the major houses - the managers of the royal household. Subsequently, the kings from the House of Merovingians, who lost real power, received the nickname “lazy kings” from their contemporaries. After a long struggle among the Frankish nobility in 687, Pepin of Geristal became the mayor of the entire Frankish state.

Pepin's successor Charles Martell ("The Hammer") began his reign by pacifying the unrest in the kingdom. Then he carried out the so-called beneficiary reform. Its essence was that instead of the allods that prevailed under the Merovingians, the system of granting land as conditional feudal property in the form of benefice (literally “good deeds”) received widespread and complete form. The beneficiary complained of lifelong use on the terms of performing certain services, most often equestrian military. Over time, benefices began to transform from lifelong into hereditary ownership and during the 9th–10th centuries. acquired the features of a feud, that is, a hereditary conditional holding associated with the obligation to perform military service.

In 732, in the decisive battle of Poitiers, Charles Martel inflicted a crushing defeat on the Arabs, who had by that time conquered the Iberian Peninsula, thereby stopping their further advance into the continent. Martell's son and successor, Pepin the Short, regulated relations with the church, somewhat aggravated by the reform carried out by his father, and in 751, at a meeting of the Frankish nobility and his vassals in Soissons, Pepin was proclaimed king of the Franks. The last Merovingian king, Childeric III, was imprisoned in a monastery. The Carolingian era began. At the call of Pope Stephen II, Pepin, by force of arms, forced the Lombard king to give the pope the cities of the Roman region and the lands of the Ravenna Exarchate (former Byzantine possession) that he had previously captured. On these lands in Central Italy, the Papal State arose in 756, which lasted for more than a thousand years. The son of Pepin the Short, Charlemagne, became the most famous Frankish king.

The Frankish state occupied vast territories in Central and Western Europe until the 5th century. were part of the Western Roman Empire. The chronological framework of the existence of Frankia is 481-843. Over the 4 centuries of its existence, the country has gone from a barbarian kingdom to a centralized empire.

Three cities were the capitals of the state at different times:

• Tour;
• Paris;
• Aachen.

The country was ruled by representatives of two dynasties:

• From 481 to 751 — Merovingians;
• From 751 to 843 – Carolingians (the dynasty itself appeared earlier - in 714).

The most prominent rulers, under whom the Frankish state reached the peak of its power, were Charles Martel, Pepin the Short and.

The formation of Frankia under Clovis

In the mid-3rd century, Frankish tribes first invaded the Roman Empire. They twice attempted to occupy Roman Gaul, but both times they were expelled. In the 4th-5th centuries. The Roman Empire began to be increasingly attacked by barbarians, which included the Franks.

By the end of the 5th century. part of the Franks settled on the coast of the Rhine - within the modern city of Cologne (at that time it was the settlement of Colonia). They began to be called Rhenish or Ripuarian Franks. Another part of the Frasnian tribes lived north of the Rhine, so they were called northern or Salic. They were ruled by the Merovingian clan, whose representatives founded the first Frankish state.

In 481, the Merovingians were led by Clovis, the son of the deceased King Childeric. Clovis was greedy for power, self-interested and sought at all costs to expand the borders of the kingdom through conquest. From 486, Clovis began to subjugate the outlying Roman cities, the population of which voluntarily came under the authority of the Frankish ruler. As a result, he was able to grant property and land to his associates. Thus began the formation of the Frankish nobility, which recognized themselves as vassals of the king.

In the early 490s. Clovis married Chrodechild, who was the daughter of the King of Burgundy. His wife had a huge influence on the actions of the king of Frankia. Chrodehilda considered her main task to be the spread of Christianity in the kingdom. On this basis, disputes constantly occurred between her and the king. The children of Chrodechild and Clovis were baptized, but the king himself remained a convinced pagan. However, he understood that the baptism of the Franks would strengthen the prestige of the kingdom in the international arena. The approach of war with the Alamanni forced Clovis to radically change his views. After the Battle of Tolbiac in 496, in which the Franks defeated the Alamanni, Clovis decided to convert to Christianity. At that time, in Western Europe, in addition to the classical Western Roman version of Christianity, the Arian heresy also dominated. Clovis wisely chose the first creed.

The baptismal ceremony was performed by the bishop of Reims, Remigius, who converted the king and his soldiers to the new faith. To enhance the significance of the event for the country, the whole of Reims was decorated with ribbons and flowers, a font was installed in the church, and a huge number of candles were burning. The baptism of Frankia elevated Clovis above other German rulers who disputed their right to supremacy in Gaul.

Clovis's main opponent in this region were the Goths, led by Alaric II. The decisive battle between the Franks and the Goths took place in 507 at Vouillet (or Poitiers). The Franks won a major victory, but they failed to completely subjugate the Gothic kingdom. At the last moment, the ruler of the Ostrogoths, Theodoric, came to the aid of Alaric.

At the beginning of the 6th century. The Byzantine emperor honored the Frankish king with the titles of proconsul and patrician, which elevated Clovis as a Christian ruler.

Throughout his reign, Clovis defended his rights to Gaul. An important step in this direction was the transfer of the royal court from Tournai to Lutetia (modern Paris). Lutetia was not only a well-fortified and developed city, but also the center of all of Gaul.

Clovis had many more ambitious plans, but they were not destined to be realized. The last great act of the Frankish king was the unification of the Salic and Ripuarian Franks.

Frankish state in the 6th-7th centuries.

Clovis had four sons - Theodoric, Childerbert, Clodomer and Clothar, who, unlike their wise father, did not see the point in creating a single centralized state. Immediately after his death, the kingdom was divided into four parts with capitals at:

• Reims (Theodoric);
• Orleans (Chlodomer);
• Paris (Hilderbert);
• Soissons (Chlothar).

This division weakened the kingdom, but did not prevent the Franks from conducting successful military campaigns. The most significant victories for the Frankish kingdom include the successful campaigns against the Thuringian and Burgundian kingdoms. They were conquered and incorporated into Frankia.

After the death of Khdodvig, the kingdom plunged into internecine wars for two hundred years. Twice the country found itself under the rule of one ruler. The first time this happened was in 558, when Clovis's youngest son Clothar the First was able to unite all parts of the kingdom. But his reign lasted only three years, and civil strife again overwhelmed the country. The Frankish kingdom was united for the second time only in 613 by Chlothar the Second, who ruled the country until 628.

The results of long-term civil strife were:

• Constant change in internal boundaries;
• Confrontations between relatives;
• Murders;
• Dragging vigilantes and ordinary peasants into political confrontation;
• Political rivalry;
• Lack of central authority;
• Cruelty and licentiousness;
• Violation of Christian values;
• Decline in the authority of the church;
• Enrichment of the military class due to constant campaigns and robberies.

Socio-economic development under the Merovingians

Despite the political fragmentation of the 6th-7th centuries, it was at this time that Frankish society experienced rapid development of social ties. The basis of the social structure was feudalism, which arose under Clovis. The king of the Franks was the supreme overlord who granted land to his vassal warriors in exchange for faithful service. This is how two main forms of land ownership arose:

• Hereditary;
• Alienable.

The warriors, receiving land for their service, gradually grew rich and became large feudal landowners.

There was a separation from the general mass and strengthening of noble families. Their power undermined the power of the king, which resulted in the gradual strengthening of the positions of the mayordomos - managers at the royal court.

The changes also affected the peasant community-mark. Peasants received land as private property, which accelerated the processes of property and social stratification. Some people became fabulously rich, while others lost everything. Landless peasants quickly became dependent on the feudal lords. In the early medieval kingdom of the Franks there were two forms of enslavement of peasants:

1. Through comments. The impoverished peasant asked the feudal lord to establish protection over him and transferred his lands to him for this, recognizing his personal dependence on the patron. In addition to the transfer of land, the poor man was obliged to follow any instructions of the lord;
2. Through bakery - a special agreement between the feudal lord and the peasant, according to which the latter received a plot of land for use in exchange for fulfilling duties;

In most cases, the impoverishment of the peasant inevitably led to the loss of personal freedom. In a matter of decades, most of the population of Frankia became enslaved.

Rule of mayors

By the end of the 7th century. royal power was no longer an authority in the Frankish kingdom. All levers of power were concentrated at the mayors, whose position in the late 7th - early 8th centuries. became hereditary. This caused the rulers of the Merovingian dynasty to lose control of the country.

At the beginning of the 8th century. Legislative and executive power passed to the noble Frankish family of Martells. Then the position of royal majordomo was taken by Charles Martell, who carried out a number of important reforms:

• On his initiative, a new form of ownership arose - benefices. All lands and peasants included in the benefices became conditionally their own vassal. Only persons who performed military service had the right to hold benefices. Leaving service also meant loss of benefit. The right to distribute benefits belonged to large landowners and the mayordomo. The result of this reform was the formation of a strong vassal-feudal system;
• An army reform was carried out, within the framework of which a mobile cavalry army was created;
• The vertical of power was strengthened;
• The entire territory of the state was divided into districts, headed by counts appointed directly by the king. Judicial, military and administrative power was concentrated in the hands of each count.

The results of Charles Martell's reforms were:

• Rapid growth and strengthening of the feudal system;
• Strengthening the judicial and financial systems;
• The growth of the power and authority of the feudal lords;
• Increasing the rights of landowners, especially large ones. At that time, in the Frankish kingdom there was a practice of distributing letters of immunity that could only be issued by the head of state. Having received such a document, the feudal lord became the rightful owner in the territories under his control;
• Destruction of the property donation system;
• Confiscation of property from churches and monasteries.

Martell was succeeded by his son Pepin (751), who, unlike his father, was crowned king. And already his son, Charles, nicknamed the Great, in 809 became the first emperor of the Franks.

During the era of the rule of mayors, the state became significantly stronger. The new state system was characterized by two phenomena:

• Complete elimination of local authorities that existed before the mid-8th century;
• Strengthening the power of the king.

The kings received broad powers. Firstly, they had the right to convene a national assembly. Secondly, they formed a militia, a squad and an army. Thirdly, they issued orders that applied to all residents of the country. Fourthly, they had the right to occupy the post of supreme commander. Fifthly, kings administered justice. And finally, sixthly, taxes were collected. All orders of the sovereign were mandatory. If this did not happen, the violator faced a huge fine, corporal punishment or the death penalty.

The judicial system in the country looked like this:

• The king has the highest judicial power;
• Locally, cases were heard first by community courts, and then by feudal lords.

Thus, Charles Martel not only changed the country, but created all the conditions for the further centralization of the state, its political unity and the strengthening of royal power.

Carolingian rule

In 751, King Pepin the Short from a new dynasty, which was called the Carolingians (after Charlemagne, the son of Pepin), ascended the throne. The new ruler was short, for which he went down in history under the nickname “Short”. He succeeded Hillderic the Third, the last representative of the Merovingian family, on the throne. Pepin received a blessing from the Pope, who sanctified his ascension to the royal throne. For this, the new ruler of the Frankish kingdom provided the Vatican with military assistance as soon as the Pope requested it. In addition, Pepin was a zealous Catholic, supported the church, strengthened its position, and donated extensive possessions. As a result, the Pope recognized the Carolingian family as the legitimate heirs to the Frankish throne. The head of the Vatican declared that any attempts to overthrow the king would be punishable by excommunication.

After the death of Pepin, control of the state passed to his two sons Karl and Carloman, who soon died. All power was concentrated in the hands of the eldest son of Pepin the Short. The new ruler received a remarkable education for his time, knew the Bible very well, was involved in several sports, was well versed in politics, and spoke classical and folk Latin, as well as his native Germanic language. Carl studied all his life because he was naturally inquisitive. This passion led to the sovereign establishing a system of educational institutions throughout the country. So the population began to gradually learn to read, count, write and study science.

But Charles's most significant successes were the reforms aimed at unifying France. First, the king improved the administrative division of the country: he determined the boundaries of the regions and installed his own governor in each.

Then the ruler began to expand the borders of his state:

• In the early 770s. conducted a series of successful campaigns against the Saxons and Italian states. Then he received a blessing from the Pope and went on a campaign against Lombardy. Having broken the resistance of local residents, he annexed the country to France. At the same time, the Vatican repeatedly used the services of Charles’s troops to pacify its rebellious subjects, who from time to time raised uprisings;
• In the second half of the 770s. continued the fight against the Saxons;
• He fought with the Arabs in Spain, where he tried to protect the Christian population. In the late 770s - early 780s. founded a number of kingdoms in the Pyrenees - Aquitaine, Toulouse, Septimania, which were supposed to become springboards for the fight against the Arabs;
• In 781 he created the Kingdom of Italy;
• In the 780s and 790s he defeated the Avars, thanks to which the borders of the state were expanded eastward. In the same period, he broke the resistance of Bavaria, incorporating the duchy into the empire;
• Charles had problems with the Slavs who lived on the borders of the state. At different periods of the reign, the tribes of the Sorbs and Lutich offered fierce resistance to Frankish domination. The future emperor managed not only to break them, but also to force them to recognize themselves as his vassals.

When the borders of the state were expanded as much as possible, the king began to pacify the rebellious peoples. Uprisings constantly broke out in different regions of the empire. The Saxons and Avars caused the most problems. Wars with them were accompanied by large casualties, destruction, hostage-taking and migrations.

In the last years of his reign, Charles faced new problems - attacks by the Danes and Vikings.

The following points are worth noting in Charles’s domestic policy:

• Establishing a clear procedure for collecting the people's militia;
• Strengthening the borders of the state through the creation of border areas - stamps;
• Destruction of the power of the dukes who claimed the power of the sovereign;
• Convening of Sejms twice a year. In the spring, all people endowed with personal freedom were invited to such a meeting, and in the fall, representatives of the highest clergy, administration and nobility came to the court;
• Agricultural development;
• Construction of monasteries and new cities;
• Support for Christianity. A tax was introduced in the country specifically for the needs of the church - tithe.

In 800, Charles was proclaimed emperor. This great warrior and ruler died of fever in 814. The remains of Charlemagne were buried in Aachen. From now on, the late emperor began to be considered the patron saint of the city.

After the death of his father, the imperial throne passed to his eldest son, Louis the First Pious. This was the beginning of a new tradition, which meant the onset of a new period in the history of France. The power of the father, like the territory of the country, was no longer to be divided between his sons, but to be passed on by seniority - from father to son. But this became the cause of a new wave of internecine wars for the right to hold the imperial title among the descendants of Charlemagne. This weakened the state so much that the Vikings, who reappeared in France in 843, easily captured Paris. They were driven out only after paying a huge ransom. The Vikings left France for some time. But in the mid-880s. they appeared again near Paris. The siege of the city lasted more than a year, but the French capital survived.

Representatives of the Carolingian dynasty were removed from power in 987. The last ruler of the family of Charlemagne was Louis the Fifth. Then the highest aristocracy chose a new ruler - Hugo Capet, who founded the Capetian dynasty.

The Frankish state was the greatest country of the medieval world. Under the rule of his kings there were vast territories, many peoples and even other sovereigns who became vassals of the Merovingians and Carolingians. The legacy of the Franks can still be found in the history, culture and traditions of the modern French, Italian and German nations. The formation of the country and the flourishing of its power are associated with the names of outstanding political figures who forever left their traces in the history of Europe.

Form of government Monarchy Dynasty Merovingians, Carolingians Kings - V century - List of kings of France Emperor of the West - - Charlemagne - - Louis I the Pious - - Lothair I

Frankish state (kingdom; fr. royaumes francs, lat. regnum (imperium) Francorum), less often Francia(lat. Francia) - the conventional name of a state in Western and Central Europe from the 9th century, which was formed on the territory of the Western Roman Empire simultaneously with other barbarian kingdoms. This territory has been inhabited by the Franks since the 3rd century. Due to the continuous military campaigns of the Frankish majordomo Charles Martel, his son Pepin the Short, as well as his grandson Charlemagne, the territory of the Frankish empire by the beginning of the 9th century had reached the largest size during its existence.

Due to the tradition of dividing inheritance among sons, the territory of the Franks was only nominally governed as a single state; in fact, it was divided into several subordinate kingdoms ( regna). The number and location of kingdoms varied over time, and initially Francia only one kingdom was named, namely Austrasia, located in the northern part of Europe on the rivers Rhine and Meuse; however, sometimes the kingdom of Neustria, located north of the Loire River and west of the Seine River, was also included in this concept. Over time, the use of the name Francia shifted towards Paris, eventually settling over the area of ​​the Seine River basin that surrounded Paris (today known as Ile-de-France), and which gave its name to the entire kingdom of France.

History of appearance and development

origin of name

First written mention of the name Frankia contained in eulogies, dating from the beginning of the 3rd century. At that time, the concept referred to the geographical area north and east of the Rhine River, approximately in the triangle between Utrecht, Bielefeld and Bonn. This name covered the land holdings of the Germanic tribes of the Sicambri, Salic Franks, Bructeri, Ampsivarii, Hamavians and Hattuarii. The lands of some tribes, for example, the Sicambris and the Salic Franks, were included in the Roman Empire and these tribes supplied warriors to the Roman border troops. And in 357, the leader of the Salic Franks incorporated his lands into the Roman Empire and strengthened his position thanks to an alliance concluded with Julian II, who pushed the Hamavi tribes back into Hamaland.

Meaning of the concept Francia expanded as the Frankish lands grew. Some of the Frankish leaders, such as Bauto and Arbogast, swore allegiance to the Romans, while others, such as Mallobaudes, acted in Roman lands for other reasons. After the fall of Arbogast, his son Arigius succeeded in establishing a hereditary earldom in Trier, and after the fall of the usurper Constantine III, some Franks sided with the usurper Jovinus (411). After the death of Jovinus in 413, the Romans were no longer able to contain the Franks within their borders.

Merovingian period

Historical contributions of successors Chlodiona not known for certain. It can definitely be said that Childeric I, probably the grandson Chlodiona, ruled the Salic kingdom centered in Tournai, being federal Romans Historical role Childerica consists of bequeathing the lands of the Franks to his son Clovis, who began to extend his power over other Frankish tribes and expand the areas of his possession into the western and southern parts of Gaul. The Kingdom of the Franks was founded by King Clovis I and over the course of three centuries became the most powerful state in Western Europe.

Clovis converted to Christianity and took advantage of the power of the Roman Catholic Church. During his 30-year reign (481 - 511), he defeated the Roman commander Syagrius, conquering the Roman enclave of Soissons, defeated the Alemanni (Battle of Tolbiac, 504), putting them under the control of the Franks, defeated the Visigoths at the Battle of Vouilles in 507, conquering their entire kingdom (except Septimania) with its capital at Toulouse, and also subdued Bretons(according to the statements of the Frankish historian Gregory of Tours), making them vassals of Frankia. He subjugated all (or most) of the neighboring Frankish tribes along the Rhine and incorporated their lands into his kingdom. He also subjugated various Roman militarized settlements ( bark) scattered throughout Gaul. By the end of his 46-year life, Clovis ruled all of Gaul, with the exception of the province Septimania And Kingdom of Burgundy in the southeast.

Governing body Merovingian was a hereditary monarchy. The Frankish kings followed the practice of divisible inheritance: dividing their possessions among their sons. Even when several kings reigned Merovingian, the kingdom - almost like in the late Roman Empire - was perceived as a single state, led collectively by several kings, and only a series of different kinds of events led to the unification of the entire state under the rule of one king. The Merovingian kings ruled by right of the anointed of God and their royal majesty was symbolized by long hair and acclamation, which was carried out by their mounting on a shield according to the traditions of the Germanic tribes at the choice of the leader. After death Clovis in 511, the territories of his kingdom were divided among his four adult sons so that each would receive approximately an equal portion of the fiscus.

The sons of Clovis chose as their capitals the cities around the northeastern region of Gaul - the heart of the Frankish state. Eldest son Theodoric I ruled in Reims, second son Chlodomir– in Orleans, third son of Clovis Childebert I- in Paris and, finally, the youngest son Chlothar I- in Soissons. During their reign, tribes were included in the Frankish state Thuringian(532), Burgundov(534), and also Saksov And Frisov(approximately 560). The remote tribes living beyond the Rhine were not securely subject to Frankish rule and, although they were forced to participate in Frankish military campaigns, in times of weakness of the kings these tribes were uncontrollable and often tried to secede from the Frankish state. However, the Franks preserved the territoriality of the Romanized Burgundian kingdom unchanged, turning it into one of their main regions, including the central part of the kingdom of Chlodomir with its capital in Orleans.

It should be noted that relations between the brother kings could not be called friendly; for the most part they competed with each other. After death Chlodomira(524) his brother Chlothar killed the sons of Chlodomir in order to take possession of part of his kingdom, which, according to tradition, was divided between the remaining brothers. The eldest of the brothers Theodoric I, died of illness in 534 and his eldest son, Theodebert I managed to defend his inheritance - the largest Frankish kingdom and the heart of the future kingdom Austrasia. Theodebert became the first Frankish king to officially break ties with the Byzantine Empire by minting gold coins with his image and calling himself Great King (magnus rex), implying its protectorate extending all the way to the Roman province of Pannonia. Theodebert joined the Gothic Wars on the side of the Germanic tribes of the Gepids and Lombards against the Ostrogoths, annexing the provinces of Raetia, Noricum and part of the Veneto region to his possessions. His son and heir, Theodebald, could not hold on to the kingdom and after his death at the age of 20, the entire huge kingdom went to Chlothar. In 558, after death Childebert, the rule of the entire Frankish state was concentrated in the hands of one king, Chlothar.

This second division of the inheritance into four was soon thwarted by fratricidal wars, which began, according to the concubine (and subsequent wife) Chilperic I Fredegonda, due to the murder of his wife Galesvinta. Spouse Sigebert Brünnhilde, who was also the sister of the slain Galesvintha, incited her husband to war. The conflict between the two queens continued until the next century. Guntramn tried to achieve peace, and at the same time twice (585 and 589) tried to conquer Septimania the Goths, but were defeated both times. After sudden death Hariberta in 567, all the remaining brothers received their inheritance, but Chilperic was able to further increase his power during the wars, again conquering Bretons. After his death, Guntram needed to conquer again Bretons. Prisoner in 587 Andelo Treaty-in the text of which the Frankish state is clearly called Francia-between Brunnhilde And Guntram secured the latter's protectorate over Brünnhilde's young son, Childebert II, who was successor Sigebert, killed in 575. Taken together, the possessions of Guntram and Childebert were more than 3 times the size of the heir's kingdom Chilperic, Chlothar II. In this era Frankish state consisted of three parts and this division will continue to exist in the future in the form Neustria, Austrasia And Burgundy.

After death Guntramna in 592 Burgundy went entirely to Childebert, who also died soon (595). The kingdom was divided by his two sons, the eldest Theodebert II got Austrasia and part Aquitaine, which was owned by Childebert, and the younger - Theodoric II, went Burgundy and part Aquitaine, which was owned by Guntram. Having united, the brothers were able to conquer most of the territory of the kingdom of Chlothar II, who ultimately had only a few cities left in his possession, but the brothers could not capture him. In 599, the brothers sent their troops to Dormel and occupied the region Dentelin, however, later they stopped trusting each other and they spent the remaining time of their reign in enmity, which was often incited by their grandmother Brunnhilde. She was unhappy that Theodebert had excommunicated her from his court, and subsequently convinced Theoderic to overthrow his elder brother and kill him. This happened in 612 and the entire state of his father Childebert was again in the same hands. However, this did not last long, as Theodoric died in 613 while preparing a military campaign against Chlothar, leaving an illegitimate son, Sigibert II, who was approximately 10 years old at the time. Among the results of the reign of the brothers Theodebert and Theodoric was a successful military campaign in Gascony, where they founded Duchy of Vasconia, and the conquest of the Basques (602). This first conquest of Gascony also brought them lands south of the Pyrenees, namely Vizcaya and Guipuzkoa; however, in 612 the Visigoths received them. On the opposite side of your state Alemanni During the uprising, Theodoric was defeated and the Franks lost their power over the tribes living beyond the Rhine. Theodebert in 610, through extortion, received the Duchy of Alsace from Theodoric, marking the beginning of a long conflict over the ownership of the region Alsace between Austrasia and Burgundy. This conflict will end only at the end of the 17th century.

As a result of civil strife between representatives of the house of the ruling dynasty - the Merovingians, power gradually passed into the hands of the mayordomos, who held the positions of managers of the royal court. During the short young life of Sigibert II, the position majordomo, which had previously been rarely noticed in the kingdoms of the Franks, began to occupy a leading role in the political structure, and groups of the Frankish nobility began to unite around the mayors of Barnachar II, Rado and Pepin of Landen, in order to deprive them of real power Brünnhilde, the great-grandmother of the young king, and transfer power Chlothar. Varnahar himself by this time already held the post Majordomo of Austrasia, while Rado and Pepin received these positions as rewards for a successful coup d'état Chlothar, execution of a seventy-year-old Brünnhilde and the murder of the ten-year-old king.

Immediately after his victory, the great-grandson of Clovis Chlothar II in 614 proclaimed the Edict of Chlothar II (also known as Edict of Paris), which is generally considered to be a set of concessions and relaxations for the Frankish nobility (this view has recently been called into question). Provisions edict were primarily aimed at ensuring justice and ending corruption in the state, however edict also recorded the zonal features of the three kingdoms of the Franks and probably gave representatives of the nobility greater rights to appoint judicial bodies. By 623 representatives Austrasia began to insistently demand the appointment of their own king, since Clothar was very often absent from the kingdom, and also because he was considered a stranger there, due to his upbringing and previous rule in the Seine River basin. Having satisfied this demand, Clothar granted his son Dagobert I the reign of Austrasia and he was duly approved by the soldiers of Austrasia. However, despite the fact that Dagobert had complete power in his kingdom, Chlothar retained absolute control over the entire Frankish state.

During the years of joint rule Chlothar And Dagoberta, often referred to as the "last ruling Merovingians", not completely conquered since the late 550s Saxons, rebelled under the leadership of Duke Berthoald, but were defeated by the joint troops of father and son and again included in Frankish state. After the death of Clothar in 628, Dagobert, according to his father's behest, granted part of the kingdom to his younger brother Charibert II. This part of the kingdom was re-formed and named Aquitaine. Geographically, it corresponded to the southern half of the former Romanesque province of Aquitaine and its capital was located in Toulouse. Also included in this kingdom were the cities of Cahors, Agen, Périgueux, Bordeaux and Saintes; Duchy of Vasconia was also included among his lands. Charibert fought successfully with Basque, but after his death they rebelled again (632). At the same time Bretons protested Frankish rule. The Breton king Judicael, under threats from Dagobert to send troops, relented and entered into an agreement with the Franks under which he paid tribute (635). That same year, Dagobert sent troops to pacify Basque, which was successfully completed.

Meanwhile, on the orders of Dagobert, Chilperic of Aquitaine, Charibert’s heir, was killed, and that’s all Frankish state again found itself in the same hands (632), despite the fact that in 633 the influential nobility Austrasia forced Dagobert to appoint his son Sigibert III as king. This was facilitated in every possible way by the “elite” of Austrasia, who wanted to have their own separate rule, since aristocrats predominated at the royal court Neustria. Clothar ruled in Paris for decades before becoming king in Metz; also Merovingian dynasty at all times after it was primarily a monarchy Neustria. In fact, the first mention of "Neustria" in chronicles occurs in the 640s. This delay in mention compared to "Austrasia" probably occurs because the Neustrians (who made up the majority of authors of that time) called their lands simply "Francia". Burgundy in those days also contrasts itself relatively Neustria. However, during the time of Gregory of Tours there were Austrasians, considered a people separate within the kingdom, who took rather drastic actions to gain independence. Dagobert, in his relations with Saxons, Alemanni, Thuringians, as well as with Slavs, who lived outside the Frankish state, and whom he intended to force to pay tribute, but was defeated by them at the Battle of Waugastisburg, invited all representatives of the eastern nationalities to the court Neustria, but not Austrasia. This is what caused Austrasia to ask for its own king in the first place.

Young Sigibert rules under the influence Majordomo Grimoald the Elder. It was he who convinced the childless king to adopt his own son Childebert. After Dagobert's death in 639, Duke Radulf of Thuringia organized a rebellion and attempted to declare himself king. He defeated Sigibert, after which a major turning point occurred in the development of the ruling dynasty (640). During the military campaign, the king lost the support of many nobles, and the weakness of the monarchical institutions of the time was demonstrated by the king's inability to conduct effective military operations without the support of the nobility; for example, the king was not even able to provide his own security without the loyal support of Grimoald and Adalgisel. Often it is Sigibert III who is considered the first of lazy kings(fr. Roi fainéant), and not because he did nothing, but because he brought little to the end.

The Frankish nobility was able to bring under its control all the activities of the kings thanks to the right to influence the appointment of majordomos. The separatism of the nobility led to the fact that Austrasia, Neustria, Burgundy and Aquitaine became increasingly isolated from each other. Those who ruled them in the 7th century. so-called “Lazy kings” had neither authority nor material resources.

The period of dominance of the mayors

Carolingian period

Frankish state at the death of Pepin 768 and the conquest of Charlemagne

Pepin strengthened his position in 754 by entering into a coalition with Pope Stephen II, who, at a luxurious ceremony in Paris at Saint-Denis, presented the King of the Franks with a copy of the forged charter known as Gift of Constantine, anointing Pepin and his family as king and proclaiming him defender of the Catholic Church(lat. patricius Romanorum). A year later, Pepin fulfilled his promise to the pope and returned the Exarchate of Ravenna to the papacy, winning it from the Lombards. Pepin will give it as a gift to dad as Pipin's gift conquered lands around Rome, laying the foundations of the Papal State. The papal throne had every reason to believe that the restoration of the monarchy among the Franks would create a revered basis of power (lat. potestas) in the form of a new world order, at the center of which will be the Pope.

Around the same time (773-774), Charles conquered the Lombards, after which Northern Italy came under his influence. He resumed paying donations to the Vatican and promised the papacy protection from Frankish state.

Thus, Charles created a state extending from the Pyrenees in the southwest (in fact, after 795, including the territories northern Spain(Spanish mark)) through almost the entire territory of modern France (with the exception of Brittany, which was never conquered by the Franks) to the east, including most of modern Germany, as well as the northern regions of Italy and modern Austria. In the church hierarchy, bishops and abbots sought to obtain the guardianship of the royal court, where, in fact, the primary sources of patronage and protection were located. Charles fully demonstrated himself as the leader of the western part Christendom and his patronage of monastic intellectual centers marked the beginning of the so-called period Carolingian revival. Along with this, under Charles, a large palace was built in Aachen, many roads and a water canal.

Final division of the Frankish state

As a result, the Frankish state was divided as follows:

• The West Frankish kingdom was ruled by Charles the Bald. This kingdom is the harbinger of modern France. It consisted of the following major fiefs: Aquitaine, Brittany, Burgundy, Catalonia, Flanders, Gascony, Septimania, Ile-de-France and Toulouse. After 987 the kingdom became known as France, since representatives of the new ruling Capetian dynasty were initially Dukes of Ile-de-France.

• The Middle Kingdom, whose lands were squeezed between East and West Frankia, was ruled by Lothair I. The kingdom formed as a result of the Treaty of Verdun, which included the Kingdom of Italy, Burgundy, Provence and the western part of Austrasia, was an "artificial" entity with no ethnic or historical community. This kingdom was divided in 869 after the death of Lothair II into Lorraine, Provence (with Burgundy in turn divided between Provence and Lorraine), and northern Italy.

• The East Frankish Kingdom was ruled by Louis II of Germany. It contained four duchies: Swabia (Alemannia), Franconia, Saxony and Bavaria; to which later, after the death of Lothair II, the eastern parts of Lorraine were added. This division existed until 1268, when the Hohenstaufen dynasty was interrupted. Otto I was crowned on February 2, 962, which marked the beginning of the history of the Holy Roman Empire (the idea Translatio imperii). Since the 10th century East Francia also became known as Teutonic Kingdom(lat. regnum Teutonicum) or Kingdom of Germany, and this name became dominant during the reign of the Salic dynasty. From this time, after the coronation of Conrad II, the title began to be used Holy Roman Emperor.

Society in the Frankish State

Legislation

Various tribes francs, for example, Salic Franks, Ripuarian Franks and Hamavs, had different legal norms, which were systematized and consolidated much later, mainly during Charlemagne. Under the Carolingians, the so-called barbarian codes -

6-12-2016, 22:09 |

Frankish state

The Frankish state was the first state formation in Europe in the Middle Ages. It is here that we learn about Charles Martel, Pepin the Short and Charlemagne. These are the main characters in the formation of the Frankish state. Initially, there was no state, but only a tribal union consisting of the Sigambri, Bructeri and other tribes of the lower Rhine.

The term "Franks" was first mentioned in 291. Later, the Franks became subjects of the fading Roman Empire. They receive from her land in Gaul for further settlement. Their relationship was ambivalent, although they were good allies. For example, when the Franks came out in their defense. When the Frankish state was at the peak of its development, it occupied the area up to the Somme.

Rise of the Frankish state

But while 486 was going on, the ruler of the Romans in Northern Gaul, Syagria, attacked the Franks and was defeated. They named the new captured territory Neustria. In 496, the first Frankish king converted to Christianity. This elevated him to the forefront of Christian believers. There was also an outstanding victory at the Battle of Poitiers. The king defeated the Visigoth army. Gradually, many began to recognize the new state that arose on such a large territory.

The Franks did not leave their home territory. They only increased its area. Most of the Gauls and Franks lived on the territory of the state. The Franks preferred to settle in a separate territory. For a long time they preserved old Germanic rites and customs.

To understand the socio-economic situation in the Frankish state, one should consider the Salic Truth. This legal document records legal customs. Of course, it has survived to this day in later lists. But, nevertheless, this is a very important source. One of the assumptions prevailing in historical science is that this document was written in the last decade of the reign. The truth records the most ancient customs of the Frankish state. Local peasants lived in a community. It was she who regulated land relations in society. Gradually, large families in the Frankish kingdom are becoming a thing of the past, only small ones remain. Family families lived next door to each other. This is how large rural settlements gradually appear.

There are many interesting customs in the Salic Truth. For example, refusal of kinship. To break family ties, it was necessary to loudly inform everyone at the meeting about the renunciation of inheritance rights and obligations. That is, to refuse inheritance, blood feud and paying taxes. If a person had no children, then the state received his property.

Social structure in the Frankish state.

For that period of the Middle Ages in any state, the largest layer were free people. The clan nobility was replaced by service, but it was still just taking shape. The king had warriors in his service. Any person could become a warrior in the kingdom, or maybe even a count. Free people were part of the national assembly and were landowners.

Slaves were also characteristic of the society of the Frankish kingdom. Without them, the Frankish state could not exist. If a slave died or was killed, his owner received compensation. Although, unlike other states, in the Frankish state the main labor force was still free people.

The Franks usually sent slaves to work on the land, and as payment they had to pay a quitrent. The owner could set the slave free, although this did not happen often. And if a slave became free, he still paid various duties to his former owner. Over time, a new stratum of society appeared in the state - litas. Judging by how they were assessed by the Salic Truth, they were probably the descendants of previously freed slaves.

Government structure of the Frankish state

With the development of the state, new governing bodies appeared in the Frankish kingdom. The Franks captured new territories, and at the same time gained invaluable experience in government. Gradually it became clear that in order to maintain large territories, it was necessary to change the government. The role of the People's Assembly as the main governing body is gradually declining. When he was already on the throne, “March fields” took place every year in the Frankish kingdom. These are inspections where free men came with weapons.

All conquered peoples paid taxes, and the Franks themselves did not contribute a penny to the state treasury. They only pledged to serve the king. Local government has also undergone many changes. The division was not tribal, but had already become territorial. These territories are now ruled by counts. In small areas, people's assemblies were still convened.

As for settlements, they are also changing. Villages and villas are built with fortifications. Defensive structures are also being built in cities. When the Merovingians began to rule, they began to build citadels in cities with a foundation in the form of a solid structure left over from old buildings. By the end of the reign of the Merovingian dynasty, one can already observe the features of the general development of the Frankish state.

Do you know that...

Interestingly, the territories of the Franks and Gallo-Romans developed differently. The Gallo-Romans mainly retained the old, everyday Roman features in their state development. But the territory of the state where the Franks lived increasingly accepted the achievements of state development from the conquered countries. But at the end of the reign of the Merovingian dynasty, it is already clear that the two cultures united into one common culture characteristic of a single Frankish state.

In the Early Middle Ages in Europe, a new state arose on the territory of Gaul. It does not have a common ethnic composition, nor common economic ties. But it gradually becomes clear that this new state entity is becoming the leading kingdom in Europe. A very powerful entity, with strong power of the king, with a well-organized government structure.

Frankish state video

Plan

Introduction

Chapter 1. The Age of the Merovingians

1.1 Franks

1.2 The emergence of a state among the Franks

1.3 Clovis I

1.4 Clovis I's adoption of Christianity

1.5 Social order

1.6 Government system

1.7 End of the Merovingian era

Chapter 2. The Carolingian era

2.1 Reform of Charles Martel

2.2 Charlemagne

2.3 Government system

2.4 Social order

2.5 Collapse of the state

Chapter 3. Right

3.1 Salic truth

3.2 Ownership

3.3 Law of obligations

3.4 Family law

3.5 Inheritance law

3.6 System of crimes and punishments

3.7 Judicial system

3.8 Process

Conclusion

Introduction

The Frankish state that emerged from the ruins of the Western Roman Empire was one of the largest in early medieval Europe. At its apogee, it covered the entire territory of modern France, Belgium and Luxembourg, as well as a number of regions of the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Spain.

The Frankish state went through two main periods in its development (from the end of the 5th to the 7th century and from the 8th to the mid-9th century). The boundary separating these periods is characterized not only by a change of ruling dynasties (the Merovingians were replaced by the Carolingians). It marked the beginning of a new stage in the deep socio-economic and political restructuring of Frankish society, during which the feudal state itself gradually took shape in the form of a seigneurial monarchy.

In the second period, the creation of large feudal land ownership, two main classes of feudal society was basically completed: a closed, hierarchically subordinate class of feudal lords, bound by vassal-feudal bonds, on the one hand, and the dependent peasantry exploited by it, on the other. The relative centralization of the early feudal state is replaced by feudal fragmentation.

This course work will examine the main periods of the existence of the Frankish state - the emergence, flourishing, collapse; Attention will be drawn to the important importance of individual personalities of the ruling dynasties; a description will be given of the main legal source of the Salic francs - “Salic truth” and individual branches of law.

CHAPTER 1 THE MEROVINGIAN AGE

1.1 Franks

The union of Germanic tribes with a common name - the Franks - formed in the 3rd century AD. on the northeastern borders of Gaul, a province of the Roman Empire. The name Frank (“brave”, “free”, “free”) appears only in the middle of the 3rd century. Relations between the Franks and the Romans were quite friendly. At the Battle of the Catalaunian Fields (451), the Franks fought on the side of the Romans as foederati. The Franks were divided into two large groups: the Ripuarian Franks, whose capital was the Roman city of Colonia, and the Salic Franks, the latter ruled by the Sicambrian family of the Merovingians. The most powerful were the Salic Franks. They first subjugated the coastal Franks, and this was their first step in conquering new lands.

The Franks, who settled in northern Gaul, in the Loire basin, spoke the Frankish dialect. But since the large indigenous population, consisting of Romanized Gauls, Visigoths and Burgundians, spoke Latin, the Franks gradually adopted this language. The combination of the Latin language and the Frankish dialect served as the basis for the formation of the Old French language.

The Franks had a primitive writing system. They knew the runic letter, which was used by almost all barbarians.

1.2 The emergence of a state among the Franks

For Gaul, the fifth century was a time of profound socio-economic transformations. In this richest province of Rome (territory almost coinciding with present-day France), the deep crisis that engulfed the empire found its manifestation. The protests of slaves, colonists, peasants, and the urban poor became more frequent. Rome could no longer defend its borders from invasions of foreign tribes and, above all, the Germans - the eastern neighbors of Gaul. As a result, most of the country was captured by the Visigoths, Burgundians, Franks (Salic and Ripuarian) and some other tribes. Of these Germanic tribes, the Salic Franks eventually turned out to be the most powerful (perhaps from Sala this was the name in ancient times for one of the rivers of what is now Holland). It took them a little more than 20 years to at the end of the 5th - beginning of the 6th century. take over most of the country.

The emergence of a class society among the Franks, which had begun to emerge even before moving to their new homeland, sharply accelerated during the conquest of Gaul.

Each new campaign increased the wealth of the Frankish military-tribal nobility. When dividing up the spoils of war, she received the best lands, a significant number of colones, cattle, etc. The nobility rose above the ordinary Franks, although the latter continued to remain personally free and did not even initially experience increased economic oppression. They settled in their new homeland in rural communities (marks). The mark was considered the owner of all the land of the community, which included forests, wastelands, meadows, and arable lands. The latter were divided into plots, and quite quickly passed into the hereditary use of individual families.

The Gallo-Romans found themselves in the position of a dependent population, several times larger in number than the Franks. At the same time, the Gallo-Roman aristocracy partially retained its wealth. The unity of class interests marked the beginning of a gradual rapprochement between the Frankish and Gallo-Roman nobility, with the former becoming dominant. And this especially made itself felt during the formation of a new government, with the help of which it would be possible to maintain the captured country in one’s hands, to keep colonists and slaves in obedience. The previous tribal organization could not provide the necessary forces and means for this. The institutions of the tribal system begin to give way to a new organization with a military leader - the king and a squad personally devoted to him at the head. The king and his entourage actually decide the most important issues in the life of the country, although popular assemblies and some other institutions of the former Frankish system still remain. A new “public power” is being formed, which no longer coincides directly with the population. It consists not only of armed people who are independent of ordinary free people, but also of compulsory institutions of all kinds, which did not exist under the tribal system. The approval of the new public authority was associated with the introduction of territorial division of the population. The lands inhabited by the Franks began to be divided into "pagi" (districts), consisting of smaller units - "hundreds". The administration of the population living in pagas and hundreds is entrusted to special trustees of the king. In the southern regions of Gaul, where the former population many times prevailed at first, the Roman administrative-territorial division is preserved. But here, too, the appointment of officials depends on the king.

The emergence of a state among the Franks is associated with the name of one of their military leaders - Clovis (486-511) from the Merovingian clan. Under his leadership the main part of Gaul was conquered. Clovis's far-sighted political step was the adoption of Christianity by him and his squad according to the Catholic model. By this, he secured the support of the Gallo-Roman nobility and the dominant Catholic Church in Gaul.

1.3 Clovis I

The years of life of Clovis I are 466-511. The young king of the Salic Franks from the family of the semi-legendary Merovei quickly realized the doom of the state of Syagria (the last Roman governor) - the last fragment of the Western Roman Empire, which did not even formally exist after 476 - and went to war against it together with other Frankish kings, his relatives. At the Battle of Soissons (486), the Gallo-Romans were defeated; Syagrius fled to Toulouse to the Visigoth king Alaric II, but was handed over to Clovis and executed.

At this time he was about 19 years old. This victory was the beginning of a whole series of military triumphs for the Salic Franks. They defeat the Burgundians, defeat the army of the largest state of that time - the Visigothic kingdom, subjugate the Ripuarian Franks (middle reaches of the Rhine), and prevail over the Alemanni. In the future, Clovis will take possession of most of Gaul.

This is how the rich region of Roman Gaul with Paris fell into the hands of the Franks. Occupying it, Clovis acted like a businessman: personally, still remaining a pagan, he tried from the very first steps to establish good relations with the rulers of the cities, the Catholic bishops. A textbook example of this is the episode with the Soissons Cup. After the victory at Soissons, among the captured booty was a cup from Reims Cathedral, which Archbishop St. Remigius and asked to return it to him, Clovis immediately agreed, but the problem was that what was captured was subject to division among all the soldiers. The king tried to exclude the cup from this section by asking the army to give it to him over and above his share. But among the warriors there was one staunch defender of the norms of military democracy, who cut the cup with the sword with the words: “You will not receive anything more than what you get by lot.” Clovis could only hand over the fragments of the sacred vessel to the prelate's envoy. He knew how to control himself and understood the formal correctness of the daredevil, but he could not forget such a challenge. When, after a goal, he had the opportunity to conduct another review of his army, the king found fault with the supposedly poor state of this warrior’s weapons and personally cut off his head, saying publicly: “That’s what you did with the cup in Soissons!” This had an effect, they began to fear the king. The clergy quickly appreciated the good will of the young monarch, and St. Remigius acknowledged his authority in writing as administrator of the Roman province.

Clovis's physical elimination of all his relatives, as possible rivals in the struggle for power, became widely known. Bloody feuds in royal families have been common among the Germans for a long time. Clovis gave them an unprecedented scale, including treachery, treachery, and murder in the arsenal of means of his internal political struggle. Clovis's services to the church were great; as the baptist of his country, His wife, Queen Clotilde, received the halo of holiness. But Clovis was not canonized, and the reason for this was the character of the king, pragmatic to the point of cynicism. Baptism was not associated with a moral revolution for him. Clovis saw the adoption of Christianity, first of all, as a practical benefit, and having already become a Christian, without any remorse, he carried out his plans for reprisals against all the kings and relatives. He set his son against the king of the Ripuarian Franks, Sigebert, who ruled in Cologne, and when he, at his instigations, got rid of his parent, Clovis' envoys killed him; Clovis annexed Sigebert's lands to his possessions, declaring his innocence in everything that happened. On other occasions he resorted to military force. So, he captured one of the kings of the Salic Franks, Hararic, with his son and forcibly cut off their hair, declaring the father a priest and the son a deacon, but then still considered this insufficient and executed both. King Ragnahar, who ruled in Cambrai, after a short war, was betrayed to Clovis by bribed traitors and killed by him personally. Combining strength with treachery, Clovis destroyed other kings related to him. The news reported by Gregory of Tours is colorful. “Having once gathered his own, he... They say that he remembered with regret the relatives whom he himself had destroyed: “Woe is me, I am left as a wanderer in a foreign land and have no relatives who could help me in case of misfortune!” But this did not mean that he was saddened by their death, but said so out of cunning, hoping to find out if anyone was still alive in order to kill every last one.”

1.4 Clovis's adoption of Christianity

The most important event of Clovis's reign was his baptism. This was preceded by the king's marriage to the Burgundian princess Clotilde, a devout Catholic, although the official religion of the Burgundian dynasty was Arianism. Clotilde immediately began to convince her husband to be baptized. Clovis waited for the new god to show what his strength was worth. The hesitation ended when the king, turning to Christ for help, won an important victory for him over the Alemanni. It was then, on December 25, 496, that the baptism of the king of the Franks with a 3,000-strong retinue took place in Reims at the hands of St. Remigration.

What was important was that Clovis accepted Christianity in its orthodox form. Previously, the baptized Germanic peoples (Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Burgundians, etc.) preferred Arianism. The orthodox, Nicene religion was perceived by them as the official religion of imperial Rome, and since their states arose in heavily Romanized territories, the kings instinctively feared that their people would “dissolve” in an alien and powerful civilization. Clovis felt that these fears were unfounded, and the configuration of his possessions was such that it provided the possibility of a constant influx of new forces from the Germanic world. The decision he made created the precondition for Romano-Germanic cultural unity and synthesis, and this is the merit of the Frankish monarch to European culture.

But the direct political benefits of baptism soon became obvious. Clovis became the natural protector of all faithful Christians of Southern Gaul, who were under the rule of the Arian monarchs of the Visigothic kingdom. He used this as an excellent reason to start a war of conquest, which took on the character of a “crusade” (507). Accompanied by miraculous signs, the Frankish army crossed the Loire and defeated the Visigoths, and Clovis himself defeated Alaric II in single combat. The Visigoths were expelled beyond the Pyrenees, Aquitaine became Frankish. The international prestige of the young state immediately increased. He was noticed in distant Constantinople, Emperor Anastasius sent ambassadors to Clovis (508), announcing the elevation of the new coreligionist of the Byzantine monarch to the dignity of consul, Clovis began to travel everywhere in the consular attire brought to him; he added a diadem to it, clearly showing that he interpreted this act as recognition of his complete supremacy over Gaul; it was not for nothing that he began to be called not only consul, but also Augustus. For the Christian population of the country, this meant additional confirmation of the legitimacy of Frankish power.

1.5 Social order

The bulk of the population of the Frankish state during the era of its formation were free Franks and Gallo-Romans. Below them on the social ladder stood litas, freedmen and slaves. The Salic Franks did not have a clan nobility during the Merovingian dynasty, but very quickly a service nobility emerged from among the royal warriors and trusted servants endowed with large land holdings.

In the VI century. Important changes took place in the socio-economic structure of the Frankish state: the scale of slavery was further reduced, and the role of rent exploitation of small landowners sharply increased. In the social elite, the place of the slave-owning layers was increasingly occupied by landowning and serving nobility of different ethnic origins; among the exploited population, the proportion of small free owners and semi-dependent land holders increased.

The founding of a number of new German settlements had a significant impact on the change in the social system. True, the proportion of newly settled Germans among the local (Gallo-Roman or Romanized Germanic) population was very small - in general they amounted to no more than 5%. But certain areas - the lower reaches of the Rhine and Meuse, the left bank of the Middle Rhine - were populated by them quite compactly.

Possessing the rights and responsibilities of members of barbarian society, the Franks participated in the military militia, were present at meetings of the “hundred” - the lowest territorial-tribal administrative unit, ensured the implementation of court decisions, elected judges, enjoyed the right to a share of war booty, etc. The Frankish nobility opposed the rank and file freemen. In the VI century. its dominance was not yet based on the industrial exploitation of ordinary free people, but on the occupation of important government positions, military spoils, from the middle of the 6th century. - after the appearance of large estates among the Frankish nobility - and on the exploitation of foreign slaves and dependents. Social differentiation in Frankish society of the 6th century. did not, therefore, reach a class split; it was limited to early class forms.

Social relations of the same type existed in the 6th century. and in the settlements created by the Ripuarian Franks and Alemanni. Although the area of ​​dominance of these relations as a whole was very small, they introduced their own specificity into the social structure of the Frankish state, increased its internal heterogeneity, and contributed to the disintegration of late antique orders. As a result, the social system of the Frankish state during most of the 6th century. was distinguished by a bizarre combination of deformed features of the late antique system, elements of a decaying tribal society, as well as some “proto-feudal” phenomena in its essence.

Salic truth consolidated the following social structure of Frankish society: secular feudal lords represented by the new service aristocracy; clergy; free Franks - peasants (the bulk of the country's population), litas - semi-free, Gallo-Romans, slaves.

The Free Franks were engaged in agriculture and lived in a neighboring community - a mark. They formed the basis of social organization. The general meeting of full members of the community decided the most important issues. Only it could, with the consent of all members of the community, accept a new resident of the village; also, by order of the king, anyone could settle on communal lands.

The arable land was the collective property of the mark. The entire peasant community as a whole retained the supreme rights to this land, but it was no longer redistributed, but was in the hereditary use of each individual peasant. The Frank could not alienate his allotment; in the event of his death, the land passed to his sons. Arable land was considered possession, not property. Forests, meadows, and pastures for livestock were in common use. The community was responsible for murder on its territory. Relatives were obliged to pay a fine for the offenses of their relatives. The Franks were annually called up for training camps called “March fields.” The king reviewed the militia.

The personal property of a Frank peasant in those days usually consisted of a house, livestock, and a plot of land. The rest of the land was allocated with farmsteads. Such household use included arable land and vineyards; sometimes meadows and forests. A wealthy family had slaves and semi-free litas as servants and artisans. Among them, the Salic truth mentions a blacksmith, a groom, a swineherd, and a winegrower.

It should be borne in mind that the Salic truth in articles about the community already records new social connections: the clan community, based on blood kinship, is replaced by a neighboring community (mark). The community-mark was the basis of the economic and social organization of Frankish society.

Staying in a mark community was not an obligation: its member could leave the community through the so-called renunciation of kinship. To do this, it was necessary at a court hearing to break three branches measuring an cubit over your head, scatter them in four directions and say that you renounce partnership, inheritance and the help of relatives title X. Leaving the community by renouncing kinship was beneficial to the richest and most powerful people. The stratification of free francs into poor and rich is also indicated by the title “About a Handful of Land,” titles about debt and methods of repaying it, about loans and their collection from the debtor, and others.

The decrees (capitularies) of the kings of the 6th century, which supplemented the Salic Truth and characterized the process of class stratification of Frankish society, already spoke of the land-poor Franks, large landowners owning estates in different places and of ruined people who were no longer able to pay fines and were wandering around the country. The reasons for the ruin were obvious: the severity of military service, separation from the economy, onerous taxes, widespread in the 6th century. and on free francs and causing a number of unrest, unaffordable fines for various types of offenses.

Salic truth contains a provision on allods - plots of land belonging to their owners as private property. Every year there were more and more allods. A layer of new service nobility appeared in the kingdom, whose representatives received lands from the king on the right of allod. Clovis also appropriated vast lands of the former Roman imperial fiscus. His successors gradually seized all the free lands, which at first were considered the property of the entire people. From this fund, the Frankish kings distributed land grants to their confidants and the church on the right of private ownership. . This nobility gradually turned into large landowners - feudal lords. The king's associates, his officials (counts), and his warriors (antrustions) became major owners. Salic truth sets them apart from the rest of the Franks, especially protecting their lives with a triple wargeld (a fine of 600 solids. At that time, the cost of a cow was 3 solids for murder) and creating from them, along with the clergy, a privileged class of the serving aristocracy.

The formation of private land ownership (allod) was supposed to subsequently lead to the widespread development of large-scale land ownership. The expansion of privately owned lands threatened the very existence of the community.

As already indicated, communal ownership of arable land, meadows and forests was combined among the Franks with individual (family) ownership of a house, plot of land, livestock, household utensils, and agricultural implements. These Frankish communities coexisted with the private land ownership of the Gallo-Romans, preserved from the times of the Western Roman Empire, and the allods that appeared among the serving feudal aristocracy and the church. However, coexistence did not last long. Communal ownership of the Franks in a large part of the country gave way to allod. At the same time, there was a process of gradual establishment of dependence on the secular and spiritual feudal lords of the free peasant population. This process took place in the 7th - 8th centuries. in various forms: in the form of giving a free person under the protection of large feudal lords (commendation) The fact is that at the end of the 6th century. A royal decree appeared, according to which communal peasants received, with the permission of the community, ownership of their hereditary land plots, which had previously been outside of civil circulation. ; debt bondage; by settling ruined free people on the land of the feudal lord under the condition of fulfilling the corresponding duties in favor of the large landowner. At the same time, the practice of so-called precaries is becoming widespread, both when a landless person receives a plot of land from a feudal lord for lifelong (and sometimes hereditary) use, and during commendation, when a peasant transfers his allod into ownership of the feudal lord and receives this land back with the obligation to pay quitrent (qualification) and perform corvée work.

Simultaneously with the growth of large landownership and the enslavement of the peasantry, there was a process of strengthening the personal power of large magnates by granting them so-called immunities (royal immunity letters), as a result of which the feudal nobility received the right within their possessions to carry out administrative, judicial, police, and military duties within certain limits and fiscal functions.

It is necessary to note the growth of church land ownership, as a result of which church magnates - bishops and abbots of large monasteries - were not inferior to secular magnates in their influence, privileges and power.

The landowning nobility began to occupy a dominant position in both the central and local government of the kingdom. The role and importance of the congress of secular and spiritual nobility increases, without whose consent the king could not make any important decisions. In the Frankish state there is a process of decentralization, which is accompanied by internecine wars.

1.6 Government system

In the processes of formation and development of the state apparatus of the Franks, three main directions can be identified. The first direction, especially characteristic of the initial stage (V-VII centuries), manifested itself in the degeneration of the organs of tribal democracy of the Franks into bodies of new, public power, into state bodies proper. The second was determined by the development of the bodies of patrimonial administration, the third was associated with the gradual transformation of the state power of the Frankish monarchs into the “private” power of the lord-sovereigns with the formation of the seigneurial monarchy, which was fully revealed at the final stage of the development of Frankish society (VIII-IX centuries). .

The conquest of Gaul served as a powerful impetus for the creation of a new state apparatus among the Franks, for it required the organization of administration of the conquered regions and their protection. Clovis was the first Frankish king to assert his exclusive position as sole ruler. From a simple military leader, he turns into a monarch, achieving this position by all means: treachery, cunning, destruction of relatives, other tribal leaders. One of the most important political actions of Clovis, which strengthened the position of the Frankish state through the support of the Gallo-Roman clergy, was the adoption of Christianity.

With the adoption of Christianity by Clovis, the church became a powerful factor in strengthening royal power. It was the church that gave into the hands of the Frankish kings such a justification for wars of conquest as a reference to the “true faith”, the unification in faith of many peoples under the auspices of a single king as the supreme, not only secular, but also spiritual head of their peoples.

The gradual transition of the Gallic elite to the Christian faith also becomes an important historical factor in the unification of Gaul and the development of a special regional feudal-Christian, Western European (Romano-Germanic) civilization.

After Clovis exterminated the clan aristocracy that competed with him, his closest support was not only the Frankish serving nobility. The latter was still very small: the number of “leudas” - warriors, the term leudes is close to fideles “faithful”, baptized along with Clovis, was only 3000. The Merovingians retained the Roman monetary tax system and Roman law (for the Gallo-Roman population).

Socio-economic, religious-ideological, ethnographic and other changes in Gallic society had a direct impact on the processes of formation and development of specific features of the state apparatus of the Frankish empire, which absorbed in the 8th-9th centuries. most of the barbarian states of Western Europe. Already in the 5th century. Among the Franks, the place of the old clan community is finally replaced by a territorial community (mark), and with it a territorial division into districts (pagi), hundreds. Salic truth already speaks of the existence of officials of the kingdom: counts, satsebarons, etc. At the same time, it testifies to the significant role of communal government bodies. At this time the Franks no longer had a general tribal people's assembly. It was replaced by a review of the troops - first in March ("March fields"), then (under the Carolingians) in May ("May fields"). But local meetings of hundreds ("malus") continued to exist, performing judicial functions under the chairmanship of the Tungins, who, together with the Rakhinburgs, experts in law ("passing judgment"), were representatives of the community.

The role of the community in court cases was exceptionally great. The community was responsible for a murder committed on its territory, nominated co-jurors who testified to the good name of its member; The relatives themselves brought their relative to court, and together with him they paid the wergeld.

The king was recognized as the bearer of supreme power. His title was inherited, so that all the Frankish kings of the 6th - early 8th centuries. belonged to the direct descendants of Clovis. The most important state prerogatives were concentrated in the hands of the king. He commanded a military militia, using not only Germans, but also free Gallo-Romans. He appointed - "on the advice and will of bishops and nobles" - and removed all senior officials, rewarding them for their service with chain gifts or land grants. In the VI-VII centuries. these awards became the full property of the new owners.

The king acted, first of all, as a “guardian of peace”, as an executor of judicial decisions of the community. His counts and social lords performed mainly police and fiscal functions. Salic truth provided for punishment for royal officials who refused to accede to the demand of a free man and to exercise power against offenders. At the same time, protecting to a certain extent the independence of the community on the part of royal officials, the Salic truth prohibited, for example, more than three social barons from appearing at one community meeting.

Royal instructions, according to Salic truth, concern a small range of state affairs - conscription into the army, summons to court. But Salic truth also testifies to the strengthening of the power of kings. Thus, for example, the performance of royal service justifies the failure of the accused to appear in the community court. Moreover, the king directly interferes with the internal affairs of the community, with its land relations, and allows a stranger to settle on communal land.

In the VI-VII centuries. under the direct influence of the late Roman order, the legislative powers of kings are strengthened, and the capitularies, not without the influence of the church, already speak of the sacred nature of royal power and the unlimited nature of its legislative powers. It is significant that the concept of treason against the king, classified as a serious crime, also appears there.

However, the king at this time is primarily a military leader, a military commander, whose main concern is “order” in the kingdom, pacifying the local nobility that goes out of obedience. The limited royal functions were also associated with the absence of effectively functioning central administration bodies, the treasury, and independent royal courts with appellate functions.

The central governing body was the royal court. It was here that the king held council with his entourage. From the end of the 6th century. The mayordomo (“house lord”) began to play an increasingly important role in this council. Initially, he managed only the palace economy, but gradually became the main administrative person of the kingdom. In addition to the palace council, state affairs were discussed on the March fields. Representing annual reviews of the general military militia in the time of Clovis - a relic of tribal meetings of the era of military democracy - the “March fields” turn into the 7th century. into the meetings of the serving nobility of different ethnic origins. Here the decisions outlined at meetings of the royal entourage were approved. The power of the Frankish kings increasingly expressed, thus, the interests of the aristocratic elite of society, which now included both secular magnates and the highest clergy; both Germans and Gallo-Romans.

The emerging state apparatus is also characterized by extreme amorphousness, the absence of clearly demarcated official powers, subordination, and organization of office work. The threads of government are concentrated in the hands of royal servants and associates. Among them are the palace count, referendarium, and chamberlain. The palace count primarily performs judicial functions, directs legal battles, and oversees the execution of sentences. The referendar (speaker), keeper of the royal seal, is in charge of royal documents, draws up acts, orders of the king, etc. The chamberlain monitors receipts in the royal treasury and the safety of the palace property.

In the VI-VII centuries. The chief manager of the royal palace, and then the head of the royal administration, was the chamber mayor, or mayor, whose power was strengthened in every possible way in the conditions of the incessant campaigns of the king, who ruled his territories “from the saddle.”

The formation of local authorities occurs at this time under the significant influence of late Roman orders. The Merovingian counts begin to rule the districts as Roman governors. They have police, military and judicial functions. In the capitularies, Tungin is almost never mentioned as a judge. The concepts of “count” and “judge” become unambiguous, their appointment falls within the exclusive competence of the royal power.

At the same time, the newly emerging organs of the state apparatus of the Franks, copying some of the late Roman state orders, had a different character and social purpose. These were authorities that expressed the interests primarily of the German service nobility and large Gallo-Roman landowners. They were built on different organizational foundations. For example, the king’s warriors were widely used in the public service. Initially consisting of a royal military detachment of free Franks, the squad, and consequently the state apparatus, was subsequently replenished not only by Romanized Gauls, who were distinguished by their education and knowledge of local law, but also by slaves and freedmen who made up the royal court staff. All of them were interested in strengthening royal power, in destroying the old tribal separatism, in strengthening new orders that promised them enrichment and social prestige.

Among the sources of state revenue in the 6th - early 7th centuries. Land and poll taxes, preserved from Roman times, played an important role. They were now levied not only on the Gallo-Romans, but also on the Germans. Although tax rates were increased more than once, tax revenue was not enough, especially since kings began to grant tax immunities to many churches, monasteries and other large landowners. From the middle of the 7th century. The place of tax revenues in the royal budget began to gradually be taken by emergency levies, court fines, trade duties, and income from royal estates. The irregularity of most of these sources of income undermined the treasury and made it difficult to reward the royal retainers; arbitrariness in the collection of fines, duties, etc. increased the discontent of the population. At the same time, the fund of land holdings, through which the serving nobility was allocated land, was also declining. The only way to ensure the loyalty of the nobles was to grant them ever new privileges: excluding them and their possessions from subordination to the county court, transferring to them the right to levy court fines, exemption from the obligation to place militia at the disposal of the kings, a promise “not to remove” from their positions, expansion of tax seizures. Some of these privileges were secured by the edict of Chlothar II in 614, others were recorded in immunity charters of the mid-7th century. The Edict of 614 gave the nobility the opportunity to control the appointment of counts, who could henceforth be selected only from local landowners.

In the second half of the 7th century. A new system of political domination and management is emerging, a kind of “democracy of the nobility,” which presupposes the direct participation of the top of the emerging class of feudal lords in governing the state.

The expansion of the participation of the feudalizing nobility in government, the "seignorization" of government positions led to the loss of the relative independence of the royal power that it had previously enjoyed. This did not happen immediately, but precisely during the period when large landholdings had already acquired significant dimensions. At this time, greater power was assumed by the previously created Royal Council, consisting of representatives of the serving nobility and the highest clergy. Without the consent of the Council, the king actually could not make a single serious decision. The nobility are gradually being given key positions in management not only in the center, but also locally. Along with the weakening of the power of kings, counts, dukes, bishops, and abbots, who became large landowners, acquired more and more independence, administrative and judicial functions. They begin to appropriate taxes, duties, and court fines.

Management functions were assigned to large local feudal lords.

In later truths, local rulers - dukes and counts - are given no less attention than the king. A fine according to the Alamanian Pravda threatens anyone for failure to comply with the demands of a duke or count, for “disregard for their summons with a seal.” The special title of the 2nd Bavarian Pravda is dedicated to the dukes “whom the people appointed or elected them”; it testifies to the breadth of those matters “that concern them.” It provides for punishment in the form of a significant fine not only for non-compliance, but also for “negligence” in carrying out their orders (2, 13), in particular, it speaks of impunity in the case of carrying out the Duke’s order to kill a person (2, 6), probably “acted against the law” (2, 2).

Moreover, according to the Alamannic truth, the position of duke is inherited by his son, who, however, faces “expulsion and disinheritance” for attempting to “take possession of it extortionately” (25, 1-2), however, the king could “forgive his son... and transfer his inheritance" (34:4). Over time, all the most important positions in the state apparatus became hereditary.

The obedience of the local nobility to the king, which remained to one degree or another, began to be increasingly determined by its personal relations with the royal court, vassal dependence on the king as a lord.

From the middle of the 7th century, during the era of the so-called lazy kings, the nobility directly took the reins of power into their own hands, removing the king. This is done first by increasingly strengthening the role and importance of the position of majordomo, and then by directly removing the king. A striking example of this is the very change of the royal dynasty among the Franks. Back in the 7th century. The Pipinid family of mayors began to stand out for its power and land wealth. One of them, Charles Martel, actually already ruled the country. Thanks to the reforms he carried out, he managed to strengthen for a certain time the unity of the Frankish state, which was experiencing a long period of political destabilization.

1.7 End of the Merovingian era

After the death of King Dagobert I in 639, there were constant internecine wars between representatives of the powerful aristocracy. At the same time, each surrounded himself with vassals, ruled like a small sovereign, involving the sections of the population dependent on him into internecine strife. In each of the three parts into which the Frankish state was divided - in Burgundy, Neustria and Austrasia, there were special heads of the palace - mayordomos, who, being representatives of the nobility, actually led the foreign and domestic policy of the state, ignoring royal power and fighting with each other . In the beginning. 640s Thuringia, Alemannia and Bavaria were separated from the Frankish kingdom, ca. 670 Aquitaine became independent, which began to be governed by its independent dukes.

In the process of internecine struggle among representatives of the aristocracy, the strongest of them rose to power - Pepin of Geristal, Major of Austrasia, who in 687 became the single Major of all three parts of the Frankish state. The title was left to the kings of the Merovingian house, and all actual power passed to the mayors. Relying on their enormous land wealth and many free vassals, Pepin and his successors brought the nobility to obedience and strengthened the military power of the Frankish kingdom. Pepin himself, having dealt with the nobility, successfully acted against the Germans in the east; he subjugated part of the Frisian territory to his power and again established Frankish influence in Alemannia and Bavaria.

Pepin's son, majordomo Charles Martell (715-741), distributing the lands of the Frankish Church as military benefices to his warriors, created a well-organized army with which he could undertake the most difficult campaigns. He conquered all of Friesland, strengthened the power of the Franks in Thuringia, and even imposed tribute on the warlike Saxons. He established close ties with Catholic missionaries who spread Christianity among the Germans and consolidated the successes of Frankish weapons across the Rhine.

In the south of the state, Charles Martel won a brilliant victory at Poitiers in 732 over the Arabs who had moved to Gaul from Spain they had conquered. The Battle of Poitiers was a turning point, after which further Arab advances into Europe were stopped. He again subjugated Aquitaine to the Franks. Charles Martel's son, Pepin the Short (741-768), finally expelled the Arabs from Gaul, conquered Septimania, and continued to consolidate the successes of the Franks across the Rhine. He completed the conquest of Thuringia, following the example of his father in the closest alliance with the church.

The Frankish majordomo, with the support of a friendly pope, imprisoned the last Merovingian king in a monastery and in 751 he himself took the throne. The new Frankish king, from whom the new Carolingian dynasty came, helped, in turn, the pope in the fight against the Lombards and gave him the region taken from the Lombards (the former Zarchate of Ravenna) to the pope as a secular sovereign. Thus, Pepin laid the foundation for the penetration of Frankish influence into Italy.

CHAPTER 2 THE CAROLINGIAN AGE

2.1 Reform of Charles Martel

In the second half of the 7th century. From among the landowning nobility of the Frankish state, a strong clan of the Pipinids (Arnulfings) emerged, which managed to unite it and subsequently replace the Merovingian dynasty with the new Carolingian dynasty. The Arnulfings took possession of the highest position of the Frankish kingdom - the chamber mayor (majordomo). In the first years of his reign, the power of the mayor of Charles (715-741), later nicknamed Martell (which means “hammer”), was finally strengthened. At this time, a serious danger loomed over the Franks from the Arab Caliphate: the Arabs, having conquered Spain, began an attack on Gaul in 720. The wars with the Arabs showed the superiority of cavalry over the infantry militia, which made up the bulk of the Frankish army. To create a cavalry, as well as strengthen the social base of his power, Charles Martell secularized a number of church and monastic land holdings and transferred them to representatives of the secular nobility. He took advantage of the right of kings to fill the highest church positions. Representatives of the secular nobility were supposed to distribute these lands in the form of lat benefices. beneficium - beneficence, mercy under the conditions of military service to the largest possible number of persons who had to appear on horseback with the appropriate weapons. The sources did not preserve data on how long it took Charles to form a new army and what its number was. It is only known that the Franks survived the decisive battle with the Arabs at Poitiers in October 732; Moreover, by ambushing an Arab camp where the looted booty was stored, the Franks caused confusion in the enemy camp; the leader of the Arab army was killed. Not daring to continue the battle, the Arabs retreated the next day. The movement of Islam to the west was stopped.

With the reform of Charles Martel, peasants were almost excluded from military service. Large landowners, medium and small feudal lords served as the basis for the creation of a new professional cavalry army. Before Charles Martell, the predominant form of royal land grants was grants of land by right of allod. Such donations quickly reduced the fund of royal lands and at the same time did not establish any new connection between the king and the feudal lords. Charles Martell introduced a completely new system of land grants in the form of benefices on the terms of primarily military service. The fund for these grants was first the lands confiscated from the rebellious magnates, and when these lands dried up, a partial secularization of church lands was carried out. . The beneficiary usually received the land along with the people sitting on it, who paid rent in his favor and performed corvée work. The use of the same form of awards by other large landowners led to the formation of suzerainty-vassalage relations between large and small feudal lords.

It should be noted that the reform of Charles Martel strengthened the central government. The layer of middle and small feudal lords, strengthened thanks to it, formed the support of the Carolingian dynasty for a certain time. Following the example of the king, other large magnates also began to practice the distribution of benefices, which contributed to the creation of a hierarchical structure of feudal society and land ownership.

2.2 Charlemagne

The Frankish state reached its peak under Charlemagne (768-814), who sought to unite all the Roman and Germanic peoples of the West, using the fighting power of the Franks and the support of the Church for this. In 773-774, Charlemagne conquered Northern Italy and annexed it to the Frankish state, declaring himself king of the Franks and Lombards, the very fact of this conquest making the papal throne completely dependent on his power. Of the Germanic tribes, only the Saxons, who occupied almost all of Lower Germany and preserved the ancient Germanic system, remained independent. For as long as 33 years (772-804), Charlemagne introduced Christianity and Frankish rule among the Saxons with iron and blood, until he finally broke their stubbornness. Having conquered Saxony and undertaken a series of campaigns into the Slavic lands, Charles built several fortresses on the border, which later became strongholds for the spread of the Germans to the east.

Charles's Danube campaigns led to the destruction of the independence of Bavaria (788) and the defeat (final in 799) of the Avar Khaganate. In the south, Charles, continuing the struggle of his predecessors with the Arabs, undertook several campaigns in Spain and extended Frankish rule here to the river. Ebro.

The conquests of Charlemagne, which brought all Western European Christian countries (with the exception of England) under the rule of the king of the Franks, gave him the opportunity to move to first place among the rulers of Europe and allowed him to achieve the imperial title as the successor of the Western Roman emperors. Charlemagne's assumption of the imperial title in 800 formalized his conquests and cemented his hegemony in Europe.

Charles's great merit lies in the fact that he was able to put in order and put into practice the correct governance of the country, which contributed to its pacification. And if the first means of unifying the empire is considered to be the personality of Emperor Charles, and the second - his Reichstag, then the third means of uniting the disparate components of the empire were, undoubtedly, the officials appointed by him.

In relation to the church hierarchy, Charles maintained his position as autocrat completely intact. By accepting the new title of Roman Emperor, he became, in part, the head of the church. Charles's multifaceted administrative activities were mainly aimed at encouraging people to engage in practical activities - agriculture, industry, and trade. He created all the conditions for this - security from external invasions and internal order, as far as was possible at that time of the predominance of brute force and, as far as it was in his power, he encouraged the development of individual industries. He himself, as the largest landowner, was a reasonable and excellent owner; his estates were exemplary economic establishments. He demanded an exact report from his stewards: if they were guilty, they had to come to the king’s residence “and answer with their backs or suffer any other punishment that the queen wishes to impose.”

The main thing was considered to be the multiplication and improvement of communication routes, and this was easier for the autocratic ruler of a large state than for the rulers of scattered possessions. Charles paid attention, first of all, to improving water communications - and in 793, a grandiose project for that time appeared to connect the Danube and Rhine basins with a canal. The project was not carried out due to the inability to obtain a sufficient number of required labor. Another beneficent undertaking, the construction of a permanent bridge across the Rhine near Mainz, also ended unsuccessfully. It took 10 years to build and was built so firmly that, according to Einhard, “everyone believed that this bridge would last for a century,” but the fire of 813 destroyed this beautiful structure within just three hours.

The collapse of the Frankish state began immediately after the death of Charlemagne.

2.3 Government system

The center of government of the empire was the imperial court with its officials - the palace count. The post of chamber mayor (mayordomo), which served as a step to the throne for Charlemagne's predecessors, was abolished. , who united in his hands, together with the administration of justice, the leadership of the royal administration; chancellor - custodian of the state seal, responsible for drawing up royal acts and heading the office; Count Palatine, in charge of palace management; archchaplain - head of the Frankish clergy, confessor of the king and his adviser on church affairs, custodian of the special shrine of the Frankish monarchs - the cloak of St. Martin Tulsky. Most of the other positions that existed earlier (marshal, seneschal, etc.) remained under the Carolingians.

Under Charlemagne, there was a council, which included high dignitaries and representatives of the nobility invited by the king. The council was convened by the king as needed; his competence extended to all matters “pertaining to the good of the king and kingdom.” To discuss matters concerning the entire state, Charles convened general congresses twice a year. At the end of spring, a general meeting (“Mayfield”) was held, in which major dignitaries, royal vassals, bishops, magnates with their vassals, as well as militias from among the free peasants took part. This meeting was also a military review.

The meetings and congresses of the times of Charlemagne were of an aristocratic character. Only courtiers, bishops and lords were called to the meeting. At the congresses, issues of war and peace, the adoption of laws, church affairs, trade matters, etc. were discussed. There was no voting. The king listened to opinions, then, in a close circle of the king’s closest dignitaries, a capitular decree was drawn up, on the basis of which various national affairs were decided.

The main administrative unit was the county. The border counties were called marques, and the leading counts were called margraves. Every two counties constituted a bishopric; Bishops, in addition to church affairs, had to monitor the behavior of the counts.

Every year, the territory of the state was divided by the king into audit districts, to which the sovereign's envoys were sent (one secular and one clergy), who took the oath of allegiance to the monarch from the population, promulgated royal orders, monitored their execution, the management of royal estates, the correct administration of justice, over the behavior of the clergy; holding officials, including counts, accountable, with the right to remove them and cancel the decisions they made.

Similar documents

The formation of the Frankish state: the social structure of Frankish and Gallo-Roman society under the Carolingian dynasty. Development of feudal relations, Organization of power on the estate, peasant resistance. records of "Salic truth" about the structure of society.

test, added 11/26/2009


The economy of the ancient Franks according to the Salic Truth. Communal system, forms of ownership in the Frankish kingdom. Microstructures of barbarian society. Legal status of the main population groups. The level of economic development of Frankish society.

course work, added 05/01/2011


The formation of a feudal state using the example of the Frankish one. The main social strata of Frankish society. The period of validity of Salic truth. Historical indications of increased wergeld for the murder of priests and bishops. Free Franks and slaves.

abstract, added 07/07/2011


A theoretical analysis of the prerequisites for the formation and main stages of development of the Frankish state - one of the most formidable and warlike powers that arose from the ruins of the Roman Empire. The politics of Clovis. The king and his administration in the Merovingian state.

course work, added 04/29/2011


Formation of the Frankish tribal union by the beginning of the 3rd century. Frankish raids on the territory of the Roman Empire, their settlement in Gaul. King Clovis of the Salic Franks from the Merovingian dynasty. Judicial customs of the Salic Franks. History of the reign of Charlemagne.

abstract, added 01/21/2010


The emergence of the Frankish state. Formation of feudal society and state among the Franks. Political system. Frankish Empire in the VIII - IX centuries. Franconia is the ancestor of the future France and Germany.

abstract, added 12/25/2002


The Roman state as the largest political formation of the slave era, the history of its formation. The significance of the reforms of Servius Tullius. Convening a national assembly. General characteristics of Salic truth. Formation of the German Empire in the 19th century.

abstract, added 03/24/2016


The emergence of the Old Russian state. The essence of Yaroslav's Truth and the reflection in it of the position of the princely squad. Development of the cities of Kievan Rus during the adoption of Yaroslav's Truth. Economic power, political, administrative, cultural centers.

abstract, added 02/22/2010


The early stage of development of statehood among the Franks: general characteristics of the occupied territory. Childeric's reign, his historical role and achieved results. Foreign and domestic policies of Clovis, directions of his activities and main successors.

course work, added 07/20/2014


Prerequisites and reasons for the emergence of the Old Russian state, stages of its formation. Russia's adoption of Christianity. The influence of this event on the historical fate of the state. The emergence and development of ancient Russian law, its historical significance.