Rotation of the body in weightlessness. Dzhanibekov effect. Why is the discovery hidden? Water flow dynamics under the influence of inertial components

Dzhanibekov effect.

There are a great many scientific hypotheses about the so-called end of the world. The statements of various scientists about the change of the earth's poles have been around for more than a decade. But, despite the fact that many of them have coherent theoretical evidence, none of these hypotheses can be tested experimentally. Indeed, it is hardly possible to be convinced by experience that the displacements of magmatic layers are to blame for planetary somersaults. Or you can’t visually see if the Earth will turn over if we melt the ice of Antarctica. But it was in the USSR, where all such assumptions were considered obscurantism, phantasmagoria and pseudoscience, that their reality was first illustrated.

Not for the first time in history, but especially recent history science, known bright examples when, in the process of testing and experimenting, scientists encountered phenomena that run counter to all previously recognized scientific theories. It is to such surprises that the discovery made in 1985 by cosmonaut V. Dzhanibekov belongs.

During the flight on the Salyut-7 orbital station, he drew attention to an effect that is inexplicable from the point of view of modern mechanics and aerodynamics. The culprit of the discovery was an ordinary nut.

When transporting goods into space, things are packed in bags, which are fastened with metal bands, fixed with screws and “lamb” nuts with “ears”. When disassembling the load in zero gravity, it is enough to hit the “lamb” with your finger. He flies away, and having calmly caught him, you put him in a certain place.

Having unscrewed another "lamb", V. Dzhanibekov noticed how the nut, having flown 40 centimeters, suddenly turned over around its axis and flew further. Having flown another 40 centimeters, it turned over again.

Dzhanibekov twisted the "lamb" back and repeated the experiment. The result was the same. Then the astronaut tried to repeat the experiment with another "lamb". Her flight to the "turning point" was already 43 centimeters.

Dzhanibekov decided to try with some other object. The launched plasticine ball in the same way, having flown some distance, turned over around its axis and flew further. From here, watching the flights in the cockpit space, Dzhanibekov became interested in these oddities, especially in their flights. It turned out that when moving in zero gravity, a rotating body changes its axis of rotation at strictly defined intervals, making a 180-degree flip. In this case, the center of mass of the body continues to move uniformly.

Even then, the astronaut suggested that such "oddities of behavior" are real for our entire planet.

The effect, discovered by Russian cosmonaut V. Dzhanibekov, was kept secret by Russian scientists for more than ten years. Asking why? And because he not only violated all the harmony of the previously recognized theories and ideas, but also turned out to be a scientific illustration of the future global catastrophes. And this means that one can not only talk about the reality of the notorious ends of the world, but also reimagine the tragedies of past and upcoming global catastrophes on Earth, which, like any physical body, obeys general natural laws.

It became clear that changes in the Earth's axis of rotation are not mysterious hypotheses of archeology and geology, but natural events in the history of the planet. Ten years after the discovery of this phenomenon by cosmonaut V. Dzhanibekov, a report was made. The report on the Dzhanibekov effect was first reported to the entire world community. Reported for moral and ethical reasons. It would be a crime to hide the possibility of a catastrophe from mankind. But theoretical part Russian scientists keep the "seven locks". One gets the impression that official science still does not have a true explanation for this effect.

Explanation of the "Dzhanibekov effect".

Let's try to explain the "Dzhanibekov effect" on the basis of the philosophy of Dualism of the Dialectic of the Absolute Paradox. Unscrewing, in weightlessness, the “wing nut”, cosmonaut Dzhanibekov, gave the rotation of the “wing nut”, in addition to the main rotation, also a precessional rotation.

Since any rotational movement is similar to the rotation of the eversion of the Torah of the Universe (for the base, see " rotary motion»DDAP).

Any rotation has its 4 cardinal points, where the equilibrium state is determined at 2 points, and the next 2 points are defined as "compression" and "stretching". A full circle of precessional rotation has its own time to pass through these 4 cardinal points. In precessional rotation, the cardinal "squeeze" point has the shortest time to pass that point, and the cardinal "stretch" point will have the longest time to pass that point. These are the so-called similar points of "perihelion" and "aphelion" of precessional rotation. It is at these cardinal points that the "wing nut" passes from one side of the Möbius strip to the other, or from the outside to the inside, or from the inside to the outside. With this transition, the axis of rotation of the “wing nut” flips 180 degrees.

So in the “Dzhanibekov effect”, the “wing nut”, as a result of a span of 40 centimeters, completed half of the precession and flips the rotation axis by 180 degrees, moving from the outside of the conditional Moebius trajectory to the inside, then after 40 centimeters completes the second half of the precession and flips the axis rotation by 180 degrees, passing from the inner to the outer side of the conditional Möbius trajectory.

Also, a similar “Dzhanibekov effect” occurred in relation to another “wing nut”, as well as a plasticine ball. And the fact that the reversal of the axis of rotation of other similar objects is carried out through other equal segments depends on the cycle time of their precessions.

Since the Earth has its own precessional rotation, the reversal of the Earth's rotation also occurs at the corresponding cardinal points of the Earth's precession. In these cases, in relation to the Sun, on the Earth, the west and east will periodically change in relative places, and an inversion of the magnetic poles will also occur.

Television stuffs us with all sorts of horrors. And we are also being hammered into our heads with the thought of the imminent end of the world - no later than December 2012. It turns out that the Mayan calendar, Nostradamus, Vanga and Globa speak about this.

For the "propaganda" of the end of the world, they even attracted an experiment in weightlessness, which our cosmonaut accidentally carried out.

BUT from history, and especially from the recent history of science, there are vivid examples when, in the process of tests and experiments, scientists encountered phenomena that run counter to all previously recognized scientific theories. It is to such surprises that the discovery made Soviet cosmonaut Vladimir Dzhanibekov during his fifth space flight. He stayed on the Soyuz T-13 spacecraft and the Salyut-7 orbital station from June 6 to September 26, 1985.

Dzhanibekov drew attention to an effect that is inexplicable from the point of view of modern mechanics and aerodynamics. The culprit of the discovery was an ordinary nut.
Watching her flight in the cabin space, the astronaut noticed strange features of her behavior. It turned out that when moving in weightlessness, a rotating body changes the axis of rotation at strictly defined intervals, making a 180-degree flip. At the same time, the center of mass of the body continues uniform and rectilinear motion. Even then, the astronaut suggested that such "oddities of behavior" are real for our entire planet, and for each of its spheres separately. This means that one can not only talk about the possibility of the notorious ends of the world, but also reimagine the tragedies of past and future global catastrophes on Earth, which, like any physical body, is subject to general natural laws.

Why is such an important discovery hushed up? The fact is that the discovered effect threw aside all the previously put forward hypotheses and allowed us to approach the problem from a completely different perspective. The situation is unique: experimental evidence appeared before the hypothesis itself was put forward. To create a reliable theoretical base, Russian scientists were forced to revise a number of laws of classical and quantum mechanics.

A large team of specialists from the Institute for Problems in Mechanics, the Scientific and Technical Center for Nuclear and Radiation Safety, and the International Scientific and Technical Center for Space Object Payloads worked on the proofs. It took more than ten years. And all these years, scientists have been monitoring whether foreign astronauts would notice a similar effect. But foreigners, probably, do not tighten the screws in space, thanks to which we not only have priorities in the discovery of this scientific problem, but we are almost two decades ahead of the whole world in its study.

For a while, it was believed that the phenomenon was only of scientific interest. And only from the moment when it was possible to theoretically prove its regularity, the discovery acquired its practical significance. It has been proven that changes in the Earth's axis of rotation are not mysterious hypotheses of archeology and geology, but natural events in the history of the planet. Studying the problem helps to calculate the optimal time frame for launches and flights spaceships. The nature of such cataclysms as typhoons, hurricanes, floods and floods associated with global displacements of the atmosphere and hydrosphere of the planet has become more understandable.

The discovery of the Dzhanibekov effect served as an impetus for the development of a completely new field of science that deals with pseudo-quantum processes, that is, quantum processes in the macrocosm. Scientists always talk about some incomprehensible jumps when it comes to quantum processes. In the ordinary macrocosm, everything seems to be going smoothly, even if sometimes very quickly, but consistently. And in a laser or in various chain reactions, processes occur abruptly. That is, before they begin, everything is described by the same formulas, after - by completely different ones, and there is zero information about the process itself. It was believed that all this is inherent only in the microcosm.

Head of the Natural Risk Forecasting Department of the National Committee environmental safety Viktor Frolov and Deputy Director of the Research Institute of Electromechanics, a member of the Board of Directors of the same Space Payload Center Mikhail Khlystunov published a joint report. In it, the entire world community was informed about the Dzhanibekov effect. This was done for moral and ethical reasons. It would be a crime to hide the possibility of a catastrophe from mankind. But our scientists keep the theoretical part behind the "seven locks". And the point is not only the ability to trade the know-how itself, but also the fact that it is directly related to the amazing possibilities of predicting natural processes.

Approximately such information about the Dzhanibekov nut is filled with World Wide Web sites, similar information has also penetrated television screens.

V. Atsyukovsky, author “Ether Dynamics”, writes: “In our Galaxy, which is a typical galaxy spiral structure, the ether circulation is carried out: from the core of the Galaxy to the periphery - in the composition of stars and interstellar gas, from the periphery to the core - in the form of a flow of free ether, that very “ether drift” (“ether drift”), about which there were so many battles.

The ether flow, moving along the spiral arm of the Galaxy and rotating around the axis of the spiral, forms a structure like a pipe. When approaching the core of the Galaxy, the ether flow narrows, increases speed and changes direction from tangential to axial. In outer area pipe, a boundary layer is formed that does not allow the ether to leave its body of the pipe, and the centrifugal force drives the ether to the walls of the pipe. Therefore, in the walls of the spiral arms, the ether density is higher than outside the spiral arms or inside them. It is in the walls that the ether velocity gradient is located, so a star that touches even the edge of the wall will then be sucked into the pipe wall. This explains the fact that the stars in spiral arms are located precisely in their walls. To an external observer, the swirling flow of ether in spiral arms should be presented as a magnetic field.

“In conclusion, it should be noted that within a stable spiral galaxy there is an aether circulation: the aether moves from the periphery of the galaxy to its center (core) along two spiral arms, which manifests itself in the form of a weak magnetic field(8 - 10 µG). In the core, the jets collide and form helical toroidal rings - protons, then the protons themselves form attached vortices around themselves - electron shells, and from the resulting proton-hydrogen gas, stars are formed, which go to the periphery along the same arms. There they dissolve in the ether, because the protons will lose their energy and stability by this time due to viscosity. The released ether returns to the core, and this process has been going on in our Galaxy for many hundreds of billions of years and will go on until the new center of vortex formation begins to suck the ether onto itself. Then a new galaxy will form, and ours will disappear. But this will not happen soon, and we will have enough time to understand that it is time to return to the concept of ether.” (Report "The state of modern theoretical physics and the ways of its development)".

In my article “Inertia is the mother of order”, published in Kaliningradskaya Pravda, I, independently of V. Atsyukovsky, suggested that inertia is the result of the interaction of the ether and torus-shaped spherical vortices (torospheres) of matter. By the way, in a personal conversation with the author of Etherdynamics, I asked a direct question: did he consider the mechanism of inertia in his works? A negative response was received. After that, I had the opinion that the scientist who revealed the secret of the mechanism of inertia (what happens inside the particles of matter) should be awarded Nobel Prize in physics.

According to "Ether Dynamics", the movement of the ether is turbulent, like the movement of an ocean wave, where in the crests zones of tension and compression, movement and counter movement can alternate.

Behavior of the Dzhanibekov nut in weightlessness under conditions space station, perhaps, and signals us about these waves of ether. Perhaps the mass of the Earth smooths out the turbulence, and the mass of the spacecraft is not enough to turn the turbulence into a laminar flow of aether. Therefore, in earthly conditions Dzhanibekov's experience cannot be repeated. It is surprising that until now the Dzhanibekov effect has not been confirmed by experiments on the ISS with a scale model of the Earth by international crews of cosmonauts and astronauts.

Returning to television and network horror stories, I must say: fears that the Earth will do a somersault, like Dzhanibekov's nut, are not grounded. The reasons for the death of mammoths, dinosaurs and other giants in the past of the Earth must be sought elsewhere.

The instability of such a rotation is often demonstrated in lecture experiments.

Encyclopedic YouTube

  • 1 / 5

    The tennis racket theorem can be analyzed using the Euler equations.

    When rotated freely, they take the following form:

    I 1 ω ˙ 1 = (I 2 − I 3) ω 2 ω 3 (1) I 2 ω ˙ 2 = (I 3 − I 1) ω 3 ω 1 (2) I 3 ω ˙ 3 = (I 1 − I 2) ω 1 ω 2 (3) (\displaystyle (\begin(aligned)I_(1)(\dot (\omega ))_(1)&=(I_(2)-I_(3))\omega _(2)\omega _(3)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(\text((1)))\\I_(2)(\dot (\ omega ))_(2)&=(I_(3)-I_(1))\omega _(3)\omega _(1)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~(\text((2)))\\I_(3)(\dot (\omega ))_(3)&=(I_(1)-I_(2))\omega _(1)\omega _(2)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(\text((3)))\end(aligned)))

    Here I 1 , I 2 , I 3 (\displaystyle I_(1),I_(2),I_(3)) denote the principal moments of inertia, and we assume that I 1 > I 2 > I 3 (\displaystyle I_(1)>I_(2)>I_(3)). Angular velocities of the three main axes - ω 1 , ω 2 , ω 3 (\displaystyle \omega _(1),\omega _(2),\omega _(3)), their time derivatives - ω ˙ 1 , ω ˙ 2 , ω ˙ 3 (\displaystyle (\dot (\omega ))_(1),(\dot (\omega ))_(2),(\dot (\omega ))_( 3)).

    Consider the situation when an object rotates around an axis with a moment of inertia I 1 (\displaystyle I_(1)). To determine the nature of the equilibrium, suppose that there are two small initial angular velocities along the other two axes. As a result, according to equation (1), it can be neglected.

    Now we differentiate equation (2) and substitute from equation (3):

    I 2 I 3 ω ¨ 2 = (I 3 − I 1) (I 1 − I 2) (ω 1) 2 ω 2 (\displaystyle (\begin(aligned)I_(2)I_(3)(\ddot ( \omega ))_(2)&=(I_(3)-I_(1))(I_(1)-I_(2))(\omega _(1))^(2)\omega _(2) \\\end(aligned)))

    And ω ¨ 2 (\displaystyle (\ddot (\omega ))_(2)) different. Therefore, initially low speed ω 2 (\displaystyle \omega _(2)) will remain small in the future. By differentiating equation (3), one can also prove stability with respect to the perturbation . Because both speeds ω 2 (\displaystyle \omega _(2)) And ω 3 (\displaystyle \omega _(3)) remain small, remains small and ω ˙ 1 (\displaystyle (\dot (\omega ))_(1)). Therefore, rotation around axis 1 occurs at a constant speed.

    Similar reasoning shows that rotation about an axis with moment of inertia I 3 (\displaystyle I_(3)) also stable.

    Now we apply these considerations to the case of rotation about an axis with a moment of inertia I 2 (\displaystyle I_(2)). Very small this time. Therefore, the time dependence ω 2 (\displaystyle \omega _(2)) can be neglected.

    Now we differentiate equation (1) and substitute ω ˙ 3 (\displaystyle (\dot (\omega ))_(3)) from equation (3):

    I 1 I 3 ω ¨ 1 = (I 2 − I 3) (I 1 − I 2) (ω 2) 2 ω 1 (\displaystyle (\begin(aligned)I_(1)I_(3)(\ddot ( \omega ))_(1)&=(I_(2)-I_(3))(I_(1)-I_(2))(\omega _(2))^(2)\omega _(1) \\\end(aligned)))

    Note that the signs ω 1 (\displaystyle \omega _(1)) And ω ¨ 1 (\displaystyle (\ddot (\omega ))_(1)) the same. Therefore, initially low speed ω 1 (\displaystyle \omega _(1)) will increase exponentially until ω ˙ 2 (\displaystyle (\dot (\omega ))_(2)) will not cease to be small and the character of rotation about axis 2 will not change. Thus, even small perturbations along other axes cause the object to "flip".

    The effect, discovered by Russian cosmonaut Vladimir Dzhanibekov, was kept secret by Russian scientists for more than a decade. It not only violated all the harmony of previously recognized theories and ideas, but also turned out to be a scientific illustration of future global catastrophes. There are a great many scientific hypotheses about the so-called end of the world.

    The statements of various scientists about the change of the earth's poles have been around for more than a decade. But, despite the fact that many of them have coherent theoretical evidence, it seemed that none of these hypotheses could be tested experimentally. From the history, and especially the recent history of science, there are striking examples when, in the process of testing and experimenting, scientists encountered phenomena that run counter to all previously recognized scientific theories. It is to such surprises that the discovery made by the Soviet cosmonaut during his fifth flight on the Soyuz T-13 spacecraft and the Salyut-7 orbital station (June 6 - September 26, 1985) by Vladimir Dzhanibekov belongs. He drew attention to the effect, inexplicable from the point of view of modern mechanics and aerodynamics. The culprit of the discovery was an ordinary nut. Watching her flight in the cabin space, the astronaut noticed strange features of her behavior.

    It turned out that when moving in zero gravity, a rotating body changes its axis of rotation at strictly defined intervals, making a 180-degree flip. In this case, the center of mass of the body continues uniform and rectilinear movement. Even then, the astronaut suggested that such “oddities of behavior” are real for our entire planet, and for each of its spheres separately. This means that one can not only talk about the reality of the notorious ends of the world, but also reimagine the tragedies of past and future global catastrophes on Earth, which, like any physical body, is subject to general natural laws.

    Why is such an important discovery hushed up? The fact is that the discovered effect made it possible to throw aside all the previously put forward hypotheses and approach the problem from completely different positions. The situation is unique - experimental evidence appeared before the hypothesis itself was put forward. To create a reliable theoretical base, Russian scientists were forced to revise a number of laws of classical and quantum mechanics.

    A large team of specialists from the Institute for Problems in Mechanics, the Scientific and Technical Center for Nuclear and Radiation Safety, and the International Scientific and Technical Center for Space Object Payloads worked on the proofs. It took more than ten years. And for ten years, scientists have been monitoring whether foreign astronauts would notice a similar effect. But foreigners, probably, do not tighten the screws in space, thanks to which we not only have priorities in the discovery of this scientific problem, but we are almost two decades ahead of the whole world in its study.

    For a while, it was believed that the phenomenon was only of scientific interest. And only from the moment when it was possible to theoretically prove its regularity, the discovery acquired its practical significance. It has been proven that changes in the Earth's axis of rotation are not mysterious hypotheses of archeology and geology, but natural events in the history of the planet. The study of the problem helps to calculate the optimal time frames for launches and flights of spacecraft. The nature of such cataclysms as typhoons, hurricanes, floods and floods associated with global displacements of the atmosphere and hydrosphere of the planet has become more understandable.

    The discovery of the Dzhanibekov effect served as an impetus for the development of a completely new field of science that deals with pseudo-quantum processes, that is, quantum processes that occur in the macrocosm. Scientists always talk about some incomprehensible jumps when it comes to quantum processes. In the ordinary macrocosm, everything seems to be going smoothly, even if sometimes very quickly, but consistently. And in a laser or in various chain reactions, processes occur abruptly. That is, before they begin, everything is described by some formulas, after - already completely different, and there is zero information about the process itself. It was believed that all this is inherent only in the microcosm.

    Viktor Frolov, Head of the Natural Risk Forecasting Department of the National Committee for Environmental Safety, and Mikhail Khlystunov, Deputy Director of the NIIEM MGSH, a member of the Board of Directors of the same space payload center that was involved in the theoretical basis of the discovery, published a joint report. In this report, the Dzhanibekov effect was reported to the entire world community. Reported for moral and ethical reasons. It would be a crime to hide the possibility of a catastrophe from mankind. But our scientists keep the theoretical part behind the “seven locks”. And the point is not only the ability to trade the know-how itself, but also the fact that it is directly related to the amazing possibilities of predicting natural processes.

    Possible reasons for this behavior of a rotating body:

    1. The rotation of an absolutely rigid body is stable relative to the axes of both the largest and the smallest principal moment of inertia. An example of stable rotation around the axis of least moment of inertia used in practice is the stabilization of a flying bullet. The bullet can be considered an absolutely rigid body to obtain sufficiently stable stabilization during its flight time.

    2. Rotation around the axis of the greatest moment of inertia is stable for any body for an unlimited time. Including not absolutely rigid. Therefore, such and only such a spin is used for completely passive (with the attitude control system turned off) stabilization of satellites with significant non-rigidity of the design (developed SB panels, antennas, fuel in tanks, etc.).

    3. Rotation around an axis with an average moment of inertia is always unstable. And the rotation will indeed tend to move to a decrease in the energy of rotation. In this case, various points of the body will begin to experience variable accelerations. If these accelerations lead to variable deformations (not an absolute rigid body) with energy dissipation, then, as a result, the axis of rotation will coincide with the axis of maximum moment of inertia. If deformation does not occur and/or energy dissipation does not occur (ideal elasticity), then an energetically conservative system is obtained. Figuratively speaking, the body will tumble, always trying to find a “comfortable” position, but every time it will slip and look again. The simplest example- perfect pendulum. The lower position is energetically optimal. But he never stops there. Thus, the axis of rotation of an absolutely rigid and/or ideally elastic body will never coincide with the axis of max. moment of inertia, if initially it did not coincide with it. The body will forever perform complex technical vibrations, depending on the parameters and initials. conditions. It is necessary to install a 'viscous' damper or actively dampen oscillations by the control system, if we are talking about KA.

    4. If all principal moments of inertia are equal, the vector angular velocity rotation of the body will not change in magnitude or direction. Roughly speaking, in the circle of which direction it twisted, in the circle of that direction it will rotate.

    Judging by the description, “Dzhanibekov's nut” is a classic example of the rotation of an absolutely rigid body twisted around an axis that does not coincide with the axis of the smallest or largest moment of inertia. And this effect is not observed here. Our planet moves in a circular orbit and its axis of rotation is almost perpendicular to the plane of orbital motion. Perhaps this difference from the “Dzhanibekov nut” (which moves along the axis of rotation) will prevent the planet from rolling over.
    ]]>

Read also: